Other · Ofsted report
London Design and Engineering UTC
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
20 Sept 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Peter Nelson
- Postcode verified
E16 2RD
- Name on report verified
London Design and Engineering University Technical College
- URN verified
2527508
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 25
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 8 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
London Design and Engineering University Technical College Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Peter Nelson, Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.1
Type of provider: Independent learning provider
p.1
Address:
15 University Way London E16 2RD Monitoring visit: London Design and Engineering UTC, 19–20 September 2019
p.1
Context and focus of visit
London Design and Engineering University Technical College (LDE UTC) is an independent learning provider, based in the London Borough of Newham. This monitoring visit report relates solely to the UTC’s apprenticeship provision. Ofsted inspected the full-time provision at the UTC, for learners aged 14 to 19, separately in October 2018, under the school inspection framework.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
LDE UTC has been running its apprenticeship programme for about two years. It offers level 3 apprenticeships in a range of engineering, building services and civil engineering standards. At the time of the inspection, a total of 32 apprentices were on programme. Most apprentices work for employers across Greater London.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers do not ensure that the programme meets the requirements of successful apprenticeship provision. Apprentices, who have been on programme for up to two years, are unsure of the structure of their programme. They are unclear about the progress they are making, or how long they are due to be on the apprenticeship. Assessors do not explain sufficiently clearly to apprentices how they should prepare for end-point assessments. As a result, apprentices have insufficient understanding of the programme, which hinders their chances of successful completion.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Assessors do not visit apprentices in the workplace frequently enough. While apprentices acquire useful work-related knowledge, skills and behaviours from their employers, assessors do not review or record the progress of apprentices in the workplace regularly. Also, they do not provide timely or detailed information to managers about apprentices’ progress. As a result, both managers and apprentices are unclear about the progress apprentices make.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Following a recent change to the personnel responsible for managing the apprenticeship provision, managers have now accurately identified the major challenges required to raise the quality of the apprenticeship programme. Managers are implementing substantial changes to help address weaknesses. However, these changes are very new, so it is too early to judge their effectiveness.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers have a well-defined strategic priority for the UTC, which is to prepare future generations for the workplace and for industry. The work-based Monitoring visit: London Design and Engineering UTC, 19–20 September 2019 apprenticeship component complements the full-time UTC-based curriculum, providing a suitable range of career routes for apprentices. Managers have fostered strong and beneficial links with employers. They have used these links well to help establish well-equipped, high-quality accommodation and resources for learners.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Assessors do not recruit all the apprentices to the most appropriate level of programme, relative to their prior knowledge, qualifications and career aspirations. A minority of apprentices are right to indicate that the programme does not challenge them sufficiently. For example, teachers do not ensure that the curriculum is suitably demanding for apprentices who have achieved high grades in A levels. As a result, these apprentices do not extend their knowledge to a higher level and tend to be less motivated by the programme.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Teachers and assessors do not ensure that they plan and deliver the classroom and work-based components of the course in a logical or sequential order. As a result, apprentices struggle to link the theoretical aspects of the course with the practical skills they acquire in their workplaces.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Staff do not match workplace expectations around deadlines, as they are too relaxed about submission deadlines for apprentices’ written work. Apprentices do not receive suitably useful or timely feedback from staff on their assessed work. As a result, they are unclear about what they need to do to improve.
p.3
Insufficient progress
For a few apprentices, their job roles do not fully enable them to develop the knowledge and skills they need to achieve the apprenticeship. For example, they carry out predominantly desk- and office-based roles, overseeing the work of others, when much of the apprenticeship requires them to develop more practical, field- based technical skills.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Teachers have designed and implemented an innovative blend of classroom and online learning materials. This model enables apprentices to work flexibly, particularly during the holiday periods, when the UTC is closed.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers have established a sound set of policies and procedures associated with safeguarding and the welfare of learners. A suitably trained designated safeguarding lead oversees the effective implementation of these policies and procedures, and deals with any safeguarding-related issues as they arise. Monitoring visit: London Design and Engineering UTC, 19–20 September 2019 Managers follow safer recruitment practices to ensure the suitability of all staff who work with apprentices. Apprentices have a reasonable understanding of the risks associated with extremism and radicalisation.
p.3
Reasonable progress
All apprentices and staff have received training on safeguarding. They have a good understanding of what actions to take in the event of any safeguarding concerns. Apprentices feel safe and have a good understanding of health and safety procedures relevant to their respective working environments. Monitoring visit: London Design and Engineering UTC, 19–20 September 2019 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding
p.4
Reasonable progress
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable progress
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Reasonable progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion