Schools & FE · School inspection (EIF)
St Francis Church of England Aided Primary School and Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
25 Sept 2019
- Inspectors verified
Nicola Harwood
- Postcode verified
B30 1LZ
- Name on report verified
St Francis Church of England Aided Primary School and Nursery
- URN verified
143434
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- It has a positive ethos and is a happy place to be. p.1
- Leaders want every child to be confident and successful. p.1
- These high expectations are not evident right across the school, however. p.2
- Pupils enjoy reading and staff support them to develop a love of books. p.2
- The new school rules – Ready, Respectful and Safe – help to emphasise that keeping safe is a high priority in the school. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is often the result of low expectations from adults, combined with some pupils who are yet to develop positive attitudes to learning. p.3
- However, inspectors have some concerns that standards may be declining, as set out below. p.1
- If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately. 24–25 September 2019 p.3
- The quality of subject knowledge among staff is not consistently strong. p.2
- Some staff have low expectations of what pupils can do. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- It is not always clear what needs to be taught and when. p.2
- Leaders should support all staff to develop their mathematical subject knowledge further. p.3
- They should continue to develop a coherent progression through the curriculum to ensure appropriate coverage of each subject area. p.3
- A clear systematic progression through the mathematics curriculum should be established which builds on what pupils already know and can do. p.3
- They should consider how to ensure that enough time is provided so that pupils secure skills and deepen their knowledge in different subjects. p.3
- Leaders should ensure that the misbehaviour of some pupils does not disrupt the learning of others. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance13
“Leaders want every child to be confident and successful.” p.1Teaching & assessment6
“Teachers do not always explain things well and some pupils are left confused.” p.2Parents & families6
“Parents also raise concerns about this sort of behaviour.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,387
- about usual (typical 1153)
- Reading level
- Plain English
- Flesch 60, typical 55
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection of a good school: St Francis Church of England Aided Primary School and Nursery Teazel Avenue, Bournville, Birmingham, West Midlands B30 1LZ
p.1
Outcome
St Francis Church of England Aided Primary School and Nursery continues to be a good school. However, inspectors have some concerns that standards may be declining, as set out below.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
This is a welcoming school. It has a positive ethos and is a happy place to be. Pupils enjoy coming to school. They take advantage of the opportunities on offer. Through the broad curriculum and the range of visits and activities such as after-school clubs, pupils develop skills for life. Leaders want every child to be confident and successful. However, expectations for how well pupils achieve and behave in their lessons are not consistently high enough.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils say that learning is interesting. They enjoy art and music as well as mathematics and reading. There are some pupils whose attitudes to learning disturb others. Parents also raise concerns about this sort of behaviour. They know that it stops pupils from learning. The new behaviour policy is helping teachers to deal with this more successfully.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are polite and well mannered. They look after one another just as the adults look after them. Older pupils enjoy taking care of younger children. The ‘High Five’ values are clear to see in all the school does.
p.1
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are safe in school. Parents who spoke to the inspector agree. They are pleased their children attend this school. Pupils are not anxious about bullying in the school. They have many friends and trust adults to help them.
p.1
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The nursery provides a very good start to school. Children quickly follow the routines because adults show them what to do. Children settle to their learning and become deeply absorbed in what they are doing. Adults help children to develop knowledge such 24–25 September 2019
p.1
2
as understanding numbers to five. These high expectations are not evident right across the school, however. This has led to a decline in some standards in the school.
p.2
2
Leaders have concerns about the quality of teaching in mathematics and rightly so. Pupils are not doing as well as they have before. This is because the mathematics curriculum is not sequenced carefully enough. It is not always clear what needs to be taught and when. Teachers do not always explain things well and some pupils are left confused. The quality of subject knowledge among staff is not consistently strong.
p.2
2
Pupils enjoy reading and staff support them to develop a love of books. Reading areas, including the one in the playground, are used well by pupils of all ages. The majority of pupils achieve the expected standard in phonics at the end of Year 1. This is despite the phonics curriculum not being well structured and delivered. Teachers use different resources and approaches to teach phonics. Pupils do not have enough opportunities to practise new sounds. Reading books are not always well matched to the sounds that pupils know and can use. This slows the progress that pupils make in learning to read fluently.
p.2
2
A broad curriculum is in place. Pupils are immersed in subjects such as art, geography and history. However, the sequence of learning does not always take account of what pupils know already. Work set does not routinely challenge and stretch pupils. Some staff have low expectations of what pupils can do. Limited time hampers pupils from acquiring the deep knowledge and skills they need for the future.
p.2
2
Leaders, including the special educational needs coordinator (SENCo), work with staff to adapt the curriculum for pupils with different needs. Pupils with different needs work and play well together. The school has an inclusive culture. In the early years in particular, pupils are well supported and integrated.
p.2
2
Low-level disruption to learning was not uncommon during the inspection. Pupils say that this happens quite often. They describe behaviour as ‘okay but not good’. Some parents voiced concerns about behaviour too. Leaders have introduced a new behaviour policy. They are working to ensure a consistent approach and higher expectations from staff.
p.2
2
Leaders ensure that all pupils have a wealth of learning opportunities and cultural experiences. This is a strength of the school. Pupils understand the school’s values and put them into practice. They talk about charitable work such as their fundraising for Acorns Hospice. They can explain why this is important. Members of the school care deeply about the well-being of each individual. This is why so many parents support the school and appreciate their child being there.
p.2
2
The trust is expanding. It is going through a period of transition. Trustees and members of the local governing body understand their roles and responsibilities. They make good use of their individual skills and knowledge to challenge and support leaders.
p.2
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. 24–25 September 2019
p.2
3
Staff understand their responsibilities for keeping children safe. Leaders make sure that all staff are well trained. Weekly briefing meetings keep staff up to date with the latest guidance. Staff really care about the pupils’ welfare. They are vigilant. They talk with the designated safeguarding leader about any concerns they have. Strong systems are in place, including those for checking staff new to the school. Leaders keep appropriate records. The school provides useful safeguarding newsletters for parents. The new school rules – Ready, Respectful and Safe – help to emphasise that keeping safe is a high priority in the school.
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
Low-level disruption is not uncommon across the school. This is often the result of low expectations from adults, combined with some pupils who are yet to develop positive attitudes to learning. Leaders should ensure that the misbehaviour of some pupils does not disrupt the learning of others. They should work with staff and pupils so that pupils develop better attitudes to learning and adults manage pupils’ behaviour consistently well. Leaders rightly identified mathematics as an area of relative weakness in the school. They have started to address the issues. A clear systematic progression through the mathematics curriculum should be established which builds on what pupils already know and can do. Leaders should support all staff to develop their mathematical subject knowledge further. Although pupils do well in the phonics screening check in Year 1, their phonic knowledge is not secure. The teaching of phonics is not consistently good. Leaders
p.3
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
should ensure that staff are trained in the teaching of phonics and early reading so that pupils become confident fluent readers. Leaders have developed a broad, engaging curriculum for pupils from the early years to Year 6. They should continue to develop a coherent progression through the curriculum to ensure appropriate coverage of each subject area. They should consider how to ensure that enough time is provided so that pupils secure skills and deepen their knowledge in different subjects.
p.3
Background
When we have judged a school to be good we will then normally go into the school about once every four years to confirm that the school remains good. This is called a section 8 inspection of a good school or non-exempt outstanding school. We do not give graded judgements on a section 8 inspection. However, if we find some evidence that the school could now be better than good or that standards may be declining, then the next inspection will be a section 5 inspection. Usually this is within one to two years of the date of the section 8 inspection. If we have serious concerns about safeguarding, behaviour or the quality of education, we will convert the section 8 inspection to a section 5 inspection immediately. 24–25 September 2019
p.3
4
This is the first section 8 inspection since we judged the predecessor school, St Francis Church of England Aided Primary School and Nursery, to be good on 12–13 June 2013.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
find out what other parents and carers think. We use Ofsted Parent View information when deciding which schools to inspect, when to inspect them and as part of their inspection.
p.4
How can I feed back my views?
The Department for Education has further guidance on how to complain about a school.
p.4
Further information
You can search for published performance information about the school.
p.4
Further information
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. 24–25 September 2019
p.4
School details
Inspection number 10111723 Type of school Primary
p.5
School details
Website http://stfrancisprimaryandnursery.co.uk
p.5
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.5
Information about this school
The school is part of the Fioretti Trust. The headteacher, deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher were all new to post in September 2019. They have worked at the school previously.
p.5
Information about this inspection
The inspector visited lessons in all year groups with the headteacher. The inspector talked to pupils about their learning and experiences in school. She looked at their work in a range of different subjects to see how well the curriculum was applied. The inspector focused on reading, mathematics and art. The inspector met with the headteacher, deputy headteacher and assistant headteacher. She also held discussions with two members of the trust including the chair of the trust, the chief executive officer and the chair of governors. Telephone conversations were held with the diocesan director of education and the school improvement partner. The inspector met with groups of teachers, including those who are new to the school, to discuss how they are supported to develop their skills, knowledge and 24–25 September 2019
p.5
6
understanding. A range of documentation was scrutinised, including school policies, curriculum documents, safeguarding information, including the checks that leaders make on staff prior to employment, minutes of governors’ meetings and published information about pupils’ performance. The school website was also scrutinised. The inspector spoke to parents at the start of day two of the inspection and considered the 69 responses to Parent View and the 56 free-text responses. She also considered an email received from a parent. The inspector considered the 15 responses to the staff questionnaire and the 12 responses to the pupil questionnaire.
p.6
Inspection team
Nicola Harwood, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector 24–25 September 2019
p.6
7
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.7
7
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
7
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
7
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
7
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion