Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Kathy Maddocks
- Postcode verified
SN10 2ND
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school has a broad curriculum that covers the subjects within the national curriculum. p.3
- However, pupils in each year group do not study all the subjects within a year. p.3
- The choice of subjects is haphazard and depends on the topic that pupils study. p.3
- Teachers did not plan and check their work in the past. p.3
- This meant that pupils learned random and disconnected facts. p.3
- Over time, pupils’ learning has become weaker, especially in English and mathematics. p.3
- Teachers are not making changes when pupils find work too easy or too hard. p.3
- Leaders have not spent the funding for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) effectively. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,335
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Sue Hulford Rowde Church of England Primary Academy High Street Rowde Wiltshire SN10 2ND
p.1
Primary Academy
Following my visit to your school on 24 and 25 September 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary Academy
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection that took place in March 2019.
p.1
Primary Academy
Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Primary Academy
Leaders and managers are not taking effective action for the removal of special measures.
p.1
Primary Academy
The trust’s statement of action is not fit for purpose.
p.1
Primary Academy
The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.
p.1
Primary Academy
Having considered all the evidence, I strongly recommend that the school does not seek to appoint newly qualified teachers.
p.1
Primary Academy
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the director of education for the Diocese of Salisbury, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Wiltshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.1
Primary Academy
Kathy Maddocks Her Majesty’s Inspector Ofsted
p.1
Primary Academy
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 1231
p.1
in March 2019
Rapidly improve the quality of teaching to raise pupils’ achievement by ensuring that all teachers: – plan work that meets the needs of different groups of pupils and provides sufficient challenge, especially for the most able pupils – use assessment to adapt and respond to the needs of different pupils in lessons – teach comprehension skills systematically and thoroughly to develop pupils’ understanding of challenging texts – teach reasoning skills effectively to deepen pupils’ understanding of mathematical concepts. Increase the effectiveness of leadership and management by ensuring that: – leaders’ plans for improvement have precise targets and milestones for pupils’ achievement and for improving the quality of teaching, and that they are implemented effectively and checked rigorously – leaders, at all levels, monitor teaching rigorously in terms of the impact on pupils’ progress in order to identify weaknesses and resolve them promptly
p.2
in March 2019
– plans for the use of additional funds are targeted precisely to improve the achievement of disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND – communication with parents is improved to keep them informed and involved in their children’s learning – governors gain a better understanding of the school’s performance to enable them to hold leaders to account rigorously – leaders tighten the arrangements for safeguarding and check frequently on the effectiveness of their policies and procedures. Improve pupils’ behaviour by ensuring that: – the management of behaviour policy is applied consistently across the school – procedures for reporting bullying are tightened and incidents of poor behaviour are followed up thoroughly to a successful conclusion – an understanding of fundamental British values is embedded throughout the curriculum to develop pupils’ cultural awareness.
p.2
Evidence
The inspector observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the headteacher, teachers, the chair of the governing body and other governors, and the executive headteacher of Acorn Education Trust (the MAT).
p.3
Context
Governors appointed the headteacher in February 2019. Before this, she had been acting headteacher. The deputy headteacher left the school in December 2018. The new deputy headteacher took up the post in September 2019. Since the last inspection, seven governors resigned from their posts, including the chair of the governing body. There are three governors at the school currently, including the new chair of the governing body. Five staff left the school in August 2019. One teacher left the school in September 2019.
p.3
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
The school has a broad curriculum that covers the subjects within the national curriculum. However, pupils in each year group do not study all the subjects within a year. The choice of subjects is haphazard and depends on the topic that pupils study. Teachers did not plan and check their work in the past. This meant that pupils learned random and disconnected facts. Over time, pupils’ learning has become weaker, especially in English and mathematics. Teachers are not making changes when pupils find work too easy or too hard.
p.3
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
Leaders have not spent the funding for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) effectively. As a result, these pupils, especially pupils with SEND, are not learning as well as they should.
p.3
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
In key stage 2, pupils read whichever book they want. No members of staff listen to them read. The most able pupils are not challenged to read more-demanding texts. Pupils who are struggling to read are not provided with any regular support to improve.
p.3
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
Pupils do not learn personal, social, health and economic education on a regular basis. Pupils know how to keep safe when using social media and the internet. They do not know about taking on responsibility or how to learn well.
p.3
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
Leaders introduced new rules about how pupils should behave last term. Although most pupils behave well, there are too many who continue to chat or walk about when others are trying to learn. Most teachers manage behaviour effectively in lessons but there are a few who do not follow the guidelines. Teachers are tracking pupils’ behaviour, so they can be more precise in their actions when pupils misbehave. Bullying is less frequent as a result. Teachers deal with it effectively on the rare occasions that it happens.
p.3
improvement identified at the section 5 inspection
Leaders are working well with the MAT which will sponsor the school from 1 November 2019. The executive headteacher has supported the headteacher with introducing new assessment systems and teachers’ planning. The leader for SEND in the MAT is working with the special educational needs coordinator so that pupils with SEND learn more.
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management at the school
The headteacher, with the support of the diocese and the local authority, has made safeguarding effective. The checks on staff in school, and for recruitment of staff, are securely in place. Leaders have made sure that pupils are safe in school by considering carefully the dangers of the two gates in the school grounds. They lock one when pupils are in school. For the other, they have lessened the risk to pupils’ safety with clear guidelines to parents for picking up and dropping off their children.
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management at the school
There has not been effective leadership at the school for some time. Neither governors nor the headteacher have had any leadership training. Governors did not fulfil their responsibility to support, challenge and guide the headteacher in the past. The headteacher has not had the capacity to make the necessary improvements. Pupils’ learning has suffered as a result and those leaving key stage 2 are not prepared well for the next stage in their education.
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management at the school
The headteacher has written a school improvement plan to deal with the issues raised at the inspection in March 2019. However, she has taken very few actions as there have not been the leaders to support her. Some parents say that communication has improved.
p.4
Strengths in the school’s approaches to securing improvement:
Leaders from the MAT are adding extra support and capacity to the school. The headteacher is benefiting from regular meetings with the executive headteacher which help her plan the next stage of improvements. New governors, including the chair, are receiving training so that they can undertake their roles more effectively. The school is fully staffed despite recent resignations. The deputy headteacher started in September 2019. She is improving the teaching of English. Also, she is monitoring the pupil premium strategy so that disadvantaged pupils achieve well. Teachers, including new staff, are keen to learn how to improve their practice.
p.4
Weaknesses in the school’s approaches to securing improvement:
The lack of leadership over time has increased the weakness in teaching and the provision of personal, social, health and economic education. Pupils in key stages 1 and 2 are achieving less well, year on year. The amount of improvement needed since the inspection has increased, not declined. Only in the past three weeks has there been any sign of planned improvements, so there is no impact.
p.5
External support
The diocese provided support to the school following the inspection. They arranged for the external review of governance and the use of the pupil premium. Immediately before the review, several governors left. There has not been any impact for disadvantaged pupils, although, currently, the new deputy headteacher is checking the plan and starting to implement the strategies.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion