Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Chellaston Academy

Inspected 10 Jul 2019 · published 25 Sept 2019 · URN 136360

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Jul 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Alison Davies, Andy Fisher, Clare Considine, Jayne Ashman, Jenny Brown, Sally Wicken

  • 16 to 19 study programmes verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    DE73 5UB

  • Name on report verified

    Chellaston Academy

  • URN verified

    136360

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallInadequate
  • 16 to 19 study programmesInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−0Mixedmore positive than 85% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivehigh-qualitystrongsafehigh expectationshighly effectiveenthusiasmexcellent
Criticisminadequatefailedweaknessesinconsistenciesshortcomingsnot effectiverequires improvementtoo low

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1666w+10
  • Leadership582w−22
  • Safeguarding197w+17
  • What needs to improve128w−73

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,502
shorter than usual (typical 3317)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 46
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%Leadership 17%Safeguarding 6%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Chellaston Academy Swarkestone Road, Chellaston, Derby, Derbyshire DE73 5UB

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Senior leaders and trustees have failed to ensure that safeguarding is effective in the sixth form. Attendance checks are inadequate, particularly for students who are absent for a long time.  Some sixth-form students spend extended periods of time on work experience. Leaders do not check up on these students and consequently do not know whether they are safe.  Senior leaders and trustees have failed to take the swift action needed to improve the sixth form. They have not checked sufficiently that the quality of sixth-form leadership is as good as is needed.  Too many students are routinely absent from the sixth form, particularly in Year 12.  The quality of teaching and learning is good overall. However, in a few cases teachers’ expectations of pupils are too low, including in the presentation and accuracy of work. When this occurs, pupils’ progress and their behaviour for learning decline.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The safeguarding of pupils in key stages 3 and 4 is highly effective. Pupils told inspectors that they feel safe and happy in their school.  The leadership of pupils’ attendance and behaviour in key stages 3 and 4 is vigilant and effective. Pupils attend school regularly and conduct themselves well.  Pupils with special educational needs and or/disabilities (SEND) are well supported.  Pupils’ attainment, particularly in English and mathematics at the end of key stage 4, was well above the national average in 2018.  Teachers have good subject knowledge. They provide clear explanations. Often, they show a genuine enthusiasm for the subjects that they teach. This is particularly evident in English.  Pupils benefit from a rich curriculum, including outside of the school day.

p.1

Full report

In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Urgently address the weaknesses in the safeguarding arrangements in the sixth form by ensuring that: – thorough checks are carried out to establish the reasons for students’ absence – the correct register codes are used to identify the reason for absence – work experience checks are rigorous and students are monitored regularly when on work placement for an extended period – students’ attendance improves, particularly in Year 12.  Leaders must swiftly provide the support needed to ensure that the leadership of the sixth form is good and that any shortcomings in the provision are fully addressed.  Improve further the quality of teaching, learning and assessment and pupils’ progress in all key stages by ensuring that the remaining inconsistencies in the quality of teaching are addressed.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate

 Senior leaders and trustees have not ensured that safeguarding arrangements in the sixth form are effective. The checks in place to guarantee the safety and well-being of students on long-term absence are inadequate. This includes students who are involved in long periods of work experience at the end of Year 12 while also on the school roll.  Leaders are not precisely aware of the reasons why some sixth-form students are failing to attend. The number of students routinely absent is high, particularly in Year 12. Sixth-form registers are poorly managed.  Senior leaders have been too slow to address the weaknesses in the sixth-form provision. They have failed to ensure strong leadership of the sixth form.  Senior leaders have an overgenerous view of the effectiveness of the school. They believe aspects of the school to be much better than they are. This includes their assessment of pupils’ outcomes and the quality of teaching, learning and assessment.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate

 Middle leaders are supported well to conduct their roles. They said that they appreciate the many development opportunities open to them, including those provided outside of the school. They particularly appreciate the support of senior leaders. Some senior leaders are new to leadership. These leaders show enthusiasm and dedication to the school. However, some are still to have an impact in their role.  Leaders have developed a curriculum that is appropriate for pupils. There are significant opportunities for pupils to enrich their learning, including outside of the school day. Pupils spoke enthusiastically about the extensive opportunities offered in sports, the arts and travel. At the time of the inspection, some pupils were due to visit Uganda. This is an annual visit and over the years pupils from Chellaston Academy have helped to build a school there. They have supported the education of pupils much

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate

less fortunate than themselves.  Pupils have many positive opportunities to learn about life in modern Britain. There are numerous chances for pupils to learn about leadership, democracy and the respect for world religions and culture. Every opportunity is taken to involve pupils in the life of the community.  Teachers benefit from a full range of activities to develop their practice. Often, they receive training from national experts. Although some inconsistencies remain, the quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good.  The Year 7 catch-up funding is used well. Pupils who enter the school at levels below those expected are supported successfully. They make good progress.  Leaders use targeted funding effectively to support pupils’ learning. Previously, disadvantaged pupils did not achieve as they should. A comprehensive strategy is in place to address this. This plan is working. More disadvantaged pupils are achieving

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate

well, and fewer are absent from school in key stages 3 and 4.  The leadership of pupils with SEND is effective. Additional funding is used successfully. This group of pupils is well supported.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Governance is not effective.  Trustees have failed to ensure that safeguarding within the sixth form is effective.  Trustees and members of the local governing board have not challenged senior leaders sufficiently in order that the weaknesses in the sixth-form provision are addressed in a timely manner.  Trustees’ assessment of the school’s effectiveness is too generous.  Members of the local governing board have shown a great deal of commitment to the school and to their role. They are beginning to gain a greater understanding of the school’s performance in key stages 3 and 4.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.  Leaders do not make routine checks on those students absent from the sixth-form provision for a long period of time, including those on work experience placements. They do not know if these pupils are safe.  Leaders do not use the correct codes for students who are absent from their sixth-form studies. They do not monitor this aspect of safeguarding with sufficient rigour.  The safeguarding arrangements for pupils in key stages 3 and 4 are effective. Leaders ensure that these pupils are safe in school.  Staff receive regular, high-quality training related to their safeguarding responsibilities. They are mindful of the needs of pupils and have a secure understanding of the actions required should a pupil disclose a problem or concern. They said that they appreciate the ‘lively’ way in which training was delivered by the designated safeguarding lead and

p.4

Safeguarding

that this was ‘really helpful’ to their learning.  Procedures relating to staff safe recruitment are in order. Records are well kept and up to date.  Overwhelmingly, parents who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, said that their children are happy and safe at school.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 Teachers plan lessons skilfully to meet the needs of the vast majority of pupils. Learning is often appropriately challenging, including for pupils with SEND. Teaching and pupils’ learning are particularly strong in English.  Teachers have excellent subject knowledge. Many teachers are enthusiastic about the subjects they teach. Pupils said that they appreciate the skill of their teachers and value the way in which this helps them to learn. One pupil told inspectors, ‘Teachers make it easy to follow the work: if I don’t get it, they find ways to help me understand.’  Teachers often use effective questioning to extend pupils’ understanding, knowledge and skills. For example, in English and humanities teachers routinely challenge pupils’ thinking through the skilful use of open questions. Pupils relish this learning.  When pupils are given the opportunity to work cooperatively they rise to this challenge.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

Inspectors observed pupils pool their resources and help each other to learn when they were finding work difficult.  Pupils demonstrate enthusiasm for reading. Pupils spoke to inspectors about favourite authors and different types of texts, including non-fiction and poetry. Those pupils who have difficulties with their reading receive high-quality support.  Teachers know pupils well and, for the most part, provide a positive climate for pupils’ learning.  Leaders have implemented a literacy strategy across a range of subjects where pupils are encouraged to identify and highlight aspects of grammar in different texts to develop their literacy skills and improve accuracy. Not all teachers are implementing this strategy and their expectations of the quality and accuracy of pupils’ work are too low. Consequently, the spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors made by some pupils remain unchecked and they continue to repeat them. Their progress is reduced

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

because their work lacks precision and care.  Some teaching is not strong enough to promote good learning, including in physical education (PE). In a few cases teachers do not have high enough expectations for pupils’ behaviour and learning.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. Although there are many strengths in key stages 3 and 4, the safeguarding of students’ welfare in the sixth form is ineffective.  Leaders’ work to promote pupils’ emotional well-being is good. Pupils receive bespoke and skilled support that is prized. They access ‘the hub’, a safe and calm space, should they require some ‘time out’.  Leaders and teachers ensure that pupils in key stages 3 and 4 are well informed about how to stay safe in and out of school. Pupils often receive very useful information and guidance from external experts, including through drama performances. They are confident to discuss aspects of staying safe, including the features of peer-on-peer abuse, radicalisation and child sexual exploitation.  Pupils said that they feel safe in school. They said that bullying and ‘falling out’ happen

p.5

Personal development and welfare

but that they are dealt with promptly and effectively by their teachers. Pupils told inspectors that ‘bullying is not the way we behave in this school’. A few parents who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, indicated a concern or lack of information about procedures to prevent bullying.  Leaders provide high-quality careers information and guidance for pupils. Pupils, particularly in key stages 3 and 4, said that they are helped to be well informed about their next steps in education, training and employment.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils’ conduct around the school is exemplary. There is a calm and orderly ethos throughout the school. Social times are managed well.  Leaders and teachers have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. The behaviour policy is effective and is consistently applied. The proportion of pupils excluded from school has declined and is lower than the national average.  Leaders have established robust and clear procedures to support pupils’ attendance in key stages 3 and 4. Pupils’ overall attendance is above the national average. The proportion of pupils who are regularly absent in key stages 3 and 4 is lower than national figures.  Occasionally, when teachers’ expectations are not as high as they should be, pupils’ behaviour for learning declines. This limits the progress they make.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Good

 In 2018, pupils’ attainment in English and mathematics was much higher than the national average. Across a range of subjects, pupils in key stage 4 made secure progress. However, some pupils did not achieve the high grades they were capable of and disadvantaged pupils made less progress than others.  The work in pupils’ books and the school’s recent assessment information show that, while there are some inconsistencies, the majority of pupils are making good progress.  Disadvantaged pupils are now achieving well because of the close support they receive. Across the school, these pupils are now making better progress than was previously the case.  Pupils with SEND receive high-quality support. Leaders and teachers make sure that appropriate steps are taken so that these pupils enjoy their learning and succeed. Consequently, they make strong progress.  Pupils who enter Year 7 with key stage 2 standards in English and mathematics below

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Good

those expected receive expert support to catch up. As a result, they access the curriculum at appropriate levels and make the progress they should across the subjects they study.  At key stages 4 and 5 the qualifications which pupils achieve ensure that they are well prepared for the next stage of their education, employment and training. A high proportion of pupils are entered for, and achieve, the English Baccalaureate suite of qualifications.

p.6

16 to 19 study programmes Inadequate

 Safeguarding arrangements in the sixth form are inadequate. Leaders do not check that the students who are absent from school, particularly for a long time, are safe.  Attendance in the sixth form is poor. The proportion of students who are regularly absent is too high, particularly in Year 12.  Senior leaders have not supported the new sixth form leader well enough. Senior leaders have been too slow to address the shortcomings in sixth-form provision.  Some students in Year 12 do work experience for extended periods of time. There are insufficient checks on the safety and welfare of these students.  The majority of students are involved in work experience in the final week of the summer term. Most select their own placement and spend one week on this activity. For these students, risk assessment processes with selected employers are in place and school staff make telephone calls to verify students’ attendance.

p.6

16 to 19 study programmes Inadequate

 The progress for students studying A-level courses dipped in 2018. Those students that achieved the highest grades at GCSE, over half of the cohort, made progress significantly below the national average.  The A-level performance scores in 2018 were in line with national averages. The stronger performances were seen in economics, business studies and geography. Weaker subject areas included computing and English literature.  Observation of students’ learning and the scrutiny of their work indicate that the quality of teaching, learning and assessment in the sixth form is inconsistent. When teaching is strong, teachers have high expectations, and they plan knowledgably and carefully to challenge and meet the needs of students. Inspectors observed this in English, French, history and further mathematics. However, in other subjects teachers fail to plan learning that makes the best use of students’ abilities.

p.7

16 to 19 study programmes Inadequate

 Students receive high-quality, impartial careers advice and guidance. Many receive extensive help to make decisions about their next steps when they leave the sixth form. The vast majority of students continue studying at university or gain apprenticeships. Retention rates are above the national average.  The students who spoke with inspectors were extremely complimentary about their experience of the sixth form. They described the provision as ‘friendly, encouraging, supportive and productive’. They said that their teachers go the ‘extra step’ to provide the help they need and ‘care for [them] as a person’.

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Gender of pupils in 16 to 19 study programmes Mixed

p.8

School details

Number of pupils on the school roll 1,666

p.8

School details

Of which, number on roll in 16 to 19 study programmes Appropriate authority Board of trustees

p.8

School details

Website http://www.chellaston.derby.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Email address contactus@chellaston.derby.sch.uk

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection February 2018

p.8

Information about this school

 Inspectors were aware during this inspection that serious allegations of a child protection nature were being investigated by the appropriate authorities. While Ofsted does not have the power to investigate allegations of this kind, actions taken by the school in response to the allegations were considered alongside the other evidence available at the time of the inspection to inform inspectors’ judgements.  The school is larger than the average-sized secondary school.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for support through the pupil premium funding is much lower than the national average.  No pupils entered the sixth form without grade 4+ in English and mathematics.  The proportion of pupils with SEND is below the national average.  The proportion of pupils with an education, health and care plan is below the national average.  The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic groups is much lower than the national

p.8

Information about this school

average, with most pupils being of White British heritage.  Too few pupils attend alternative provision to report upon.  The school is a member of the PEAK multi-academy trust.

p.9

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed learning in 61 lessons, across a range of subjects and in key stages 3 and 4 and the sixth form. The vast majority of lessons were observed jointly with leaders. Seven tutor periods were also observed.  Alongside leaders, inspectors looked at pupils’ work in lessons and samples of the work in books of pupils in Years 7, 8 and 10. The work of students in Year 12 was also reviewed.  Inspectors held a range of meetings, including with: the executive principal, head of school, senior and middle leaders, the lead for post-16, and the special educational needs coordinator.  The lead inspector met with members of the local governing board including the chair and vice-chair. A telephone conversation was held with the chair of trustees for the PEAK multi-academy trust.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour during lessons, breaktimes and lunchtimes.  Inspectors spoke formally with pupils in key stages 3 and 4 and post-16 students.

p.10

Information about this inspection

Inspectors also spoke with pupils and students more informally in lessons and at breaktime.  Inspectors scrutinised a wide range of documents including the school’s self-evaluation, its improvement plans, information about the attainment and progress of pupils, records in relation to behaviour, attendance and safeguarding, and information on the school’s website. They evaluated the effectiveness of external funds to the school, including the pupil premium. An inspector checked the school’s single central register and the school’s system for recruiting staff.  Inspectors spoke with proprietors of local businesses where Year 12 students receive experience of work.  Inspectors considered the 204 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey. There were 62 responses to the staff surveys, 159 free-text responses and 107 responses to the pupil survey.  A health and safety walk of the school site was conducted with the school business

p.10

Inspection team

Jayne Ashman, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.10

Inspection team

Andy Fisher Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.11

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.11

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.11

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.11

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.11

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion