Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder 260849
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
22 Aug 2019
- Inspectors verified
Lianne McElvaney
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
260849
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They lack enthusiasm to engage in their learning and struggle to maintain their attention. p.4
- That said, the childminder does recognise the possible signs that a child may at risk of harm. p.4
- The childminder lacks a secure knowledge of some of the child protection procedures she must follow. p.4
- This means that she is not aware of what to do if a child becomes at risk of extreme views. p.1
- The childminder does not prioritise her professional development to remedy weaknesses in her practice and raise the quality of teaching to the highest level. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. p.2
- The inspector was given a tour of the areas of the home used for childminding purposes. p.2
- The inspector looked at children's records, a sample of policies and evidence of the suitability of the childminder and other adults in the household. p.2
- The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the childminder. p.2
- The inspector spoke with the childminder and children at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of the views of parents. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 1,002
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date 22 August 2019 Previous inspection date 2 April 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Good 2 Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4 Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4 Outcomes for children Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
n The childminder is not clear about the procedure to follow in the event of an allegation being made against her or a member of her family. Furthermore, she has not gained sufficient knowledge of the 'Prevent' duty guidance. This means that she is not aware of what to do if a child becomes at risk of extreme views. n The childminder does not prioritise her professional development to remedy weaknesses in her practice and raise the quality of teaching to the highest level. n The childminder does not effectively provide children with consistent boundaries and clear explanations of what is acceptable behaviour. Consequently, children do not always know what is expected of them and, at times, they display unwanted behaviour. n The monitoring and assessment of children's learning are ineffective. The childminder fails to accurately assess children's stages of development. This means that gaps in children's learning go unnoticed and children do not make good enough progress.
p.1
This provision is inadequate
n The childminder does not plan activities that challenge young children to achieve success in their next stage in learning. n The childminder does not carry out progress checks for children aged between two and three years. This means she is unable to provide parents and other professionals with an accurate view of children's progress.
p.1
It has the following strengths
n The childminder teaches children about good hygiene practices as part of their daily routines. For example, they wash their hands before snack time and after using the toilet.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date ensure a secure knowledge of the procedures to follow in the event of an allegation being made, including informing the local authority designated safeguarding officer 20/09/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
improve knowledge of the 'Prevent' duty guidance for England and Wales 2015 to protect children who may be at risk of harm 20/09/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
manage children's behaviour in an appropriate way, that gives them clear messages about safe play and what is expected of them at different times and in different situations 20/09/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
use assessment to accurately identify where children are in their development and rigorously monitor their ongoing development, to correctly establish what children need to learn next 18/10/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
plan and provide challenging activities that focus on children's most-relevant next steps in learning 18/10/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
complete the required progress check for children aged between two and three years and provide parents with a written summary of their child's development in the prime areas of learning 18/10/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
improve professional knowledge and teaching, so that all children can be provided with quality learning and development experiences. 20/09/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. n The inspector was given a tour of the areas of the home used for childminding purposes. n The inspector looked at children's records, a sample of policies and evidence of the suitability of the childminder and other adults in the household. n The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the childminder. n The inspector spoke with the childminder and children at appropriate times during the inspection and took account of the views of parents. Inspector Lianne McElvaney
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is not effective. The childminder lacks a secure knowledge of some of the child protection procedures she must follow. She has not taken sufficient steps to keep her training updated about some wider aspects of safeguarding issues. The childminder does not ensure her professional development is up to date. Consequently, gaps in her knowledge lead to children's learning needs not being met. That said, the childminder does recognise the possible signs that a child may at risk of harm. She knows how to report any concerns she may have in a timely manner. The childminder risk assesses the environment to prevent children being put at risk of injury.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
Weaknesses in teaching and assessment have a significant impact on children's learning and development. The childminder does not accurately measure the progress children make. She does not plan activities to meet children's individual learning needs. The childminder fails to build on children's interests or extend their learning. Activities are generally mundane. The childminder does not offer children the challenge they need to make progress in their learning. As a result, children become bored and move quickly from one activity to another. The childminder does not review each child's progress, as required, between the ages of two and three years. The childminder offers parents daily verbal feedback about children's routines and daily experiences.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The identified weaknesses have a negative impact on the safety and welfare of children. Furthermore, the childminder does not help children to understand the importance of boundaries and expectations of behaviour. When children stand on chairs, she does not encourage them to get down or explain why this puts them at risk of injury. Consequently, children are not learning how to behave appropriately or keep themselves safe. Children have opportunities to be physically active on a daily basis. The childminder provides children with a varied and well-balanced diet. This helps children to learn how to lead a healthy lifestyle. Children demonstrate their positive relationships with the childminder. For example, they go to the childminder for cuddles and receive praise and reassurance. This helps children to feel confident and emotionally secure. Children confidently explore their environment and make independent choices about what they
p.4
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Children do not make the progress they are capable of due to weaknesses in teaching. They lack enthusiasm to engage in their learning and struggle to maintain their attention. For example, although children show an interest in books, the childminder fails to sustain their interest. Consequently, their understanding of stories is not developed. They do not learn to persist well when completing tasks and struggle to build on what they already know and can do. Children are not fully equipped with the key skills needed for the eventual move on to school. Despite this, children use some mathematical language in their play. For example, they talk about shapes and size.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 260849 Local authority Derby Inspection number 10059751 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 2 - 11 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 6 Date of previous inspection 2 April 2015
p.5
Registers
The childminder registered in 2001. She lives in the Chaddesden, Derby. The childminding provision operates Monday to Friday from 6.30am until 6pm, all year round, except for Christmas and bank holidays and family holidays.
p.5
Registers
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Registers
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Registers
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Registers
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.6
Registers
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.6
Registers
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion