Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Metro Bank PLC

Inspected 13 Aug 2019 · published 11 Sept 2019 · URN 2510884

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    13 Aug 2019

  • Postcode verified

    WC1B 5HA

  • Name on report verified

    Metro Bank Plc

  • URN verified

    2510884

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
15
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
8 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%About the inspection 99%

Full report text

Name of lead inspector: Françoise Beregovoi, Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Inspection date(s): 12 to 13 August 2019

p.1

Address:

1 Southampton Row London WC1B 5HA Monitoring visit: Metro Bank Plc 12 to 13 August 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

In 2017, Metro Bank became an employer provider and received funding from the Education and Skills Funding Agency through the apprenticeship levy to deliver apprentices directly. At the time of the monitoring visit, 38 apprentice cashiers were all studying towards a level 2 financial services customer adviser standards-based apprenticeship.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have a clear rationale for the apprenticeship programme. They work with external partners in order to attract apprentices from diverse backgrounds. Apprentices have no previous experience of banking and many would not meet the traditional entry criteria for a role in the banking sector.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Senior leaders have a strong commitment to staff training. Apprentices are able to progress quickly to further training such as banking qualifications. Apprentices who complete their qualification remain in the company as cashiers or are promoted to higher scale posts.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Managers have planned the programme well to ensure that apprentices receive their entitlement to off-the-job training. This includes a range of different learning opportunities, such as an intense training period at the start of the programme, master classes and online training modules.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have recruited an apprenticeship delivery team with a range of sector knowledge and educational experience. This ensures that the team has the expertise to deliver both banking sector knowledge and personal development elements relating to safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Managers have begun to identify areas for improvement in the provision and take appropriate improvement action as a result. They recognise that quality assurance of the Monitoring visit: Metro Bank Plc 12 to 13 August 2019 programme is not yet sufficiently robust. They do not yet analyse information to determine whether outcomes for apprentices are improving for different cohorts.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders have been slow to plan the integration of English and mathematics skills as part of apprentices’ vocational training. Their plans for the assessment of the speaking and listening component of functional skills English are underdeveloped. As a result, a few apprentices are unclear about the requirements for this component of their programme.

p.3

Reasonable progress

In the first year of the programme, around a quarter of apprentices left before completing, although of those who stayed almost all achieved their qualification in the planned time. Of the current cohort of apprentices, a high proportion are still on programme.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders have adapted and extended the training for cashiers effectively, to meet the requirements of the apprenticeship standard. The training and assessment plan are matched well to apprentices’ job roles and enable apprentices to develop new skills, knowledge and behaviours. Apprentices apply these confidently in their workplaces.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices are clear about the requirements of an apprenticeship at the start of their programme. Apprentices benefit from the opportunity to gain a level 2 qualification, as well as their apprenticeship.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices greatly benefit from off-the-job training and development. They attend well-planned taught training sessions. Trainers relate the learning skilfully to apprentices’ work as cashiers in the banking sector. Apprentices demonstrate mature attitudes to their learning, they are keen to learn, and they work productively in the master classes. However, trainers do not use strategies effectively enough to check learning, or to allow apprentices to explore topics further through responses to questions.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices develop a range of relevant new skills, knowledge and behaviours. They confidently build a rapport with customers while dealing with problems. They have developed their understanding of how to use bank systems correctly, such as how to make international payments and process high value transactions. Apprentices regularly reflect on the individual development of their skills and knowledge, particularly in individual reviews and in their written portfolios.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices benefit from helpful feedback on their assessed work, which enables them to understand how they can improve their work further. They make good progress in working towards the apprenticeship standards. Monitoring visit: Metro Bank Plc 12 to 13 August 2019 Apprentices do not benefit from sufficient opportunities in their vocational training to develop their skills further in English and mathematics. Apprentices who need to achieve functional skills English are not clear enough about the speaking and listening component of their functional skills English examinations.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Managers and trainers have undertaken appropriate training to carry out their roles and responsibilities in respect of safeguarding of apprentices.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Managers have taken account of the risks to all employees and have created policies and procedures to mitigate these risks. Managers have also put in place an effective employee assistance scheme to support apprentices should they become vulnerable or need additional support.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentices feel safe at work and in their training. They benefit from well produced materials relating to safeguarding and British values. They have a clear overview of potential risks and how to keep themselves safe in the banking environment. For example, they become aware of procedures to follow in the event of a local incident and are made aware of opening and closing safety procedures and the risks of online grooming.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Managers have not yet put in place reporting procedures to record and monitor safeguarding incidents, and they currently only report by exception. While many human resources policies relate to the company’s approach to safeguarding, managers do not currently follow a specific safeguarding policy. Therefore, they have not yet established the protocols to be followed should a safeguarding incident occur. Monitoring visit: Metro Bank Plc 12 to 13 August 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to

p.4

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.5

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion