Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Malvern Wells CofE Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Jul 2019
- Inspectors verified
Marilyn Mottram
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
WR14 4HF
- Name on report verified
Malvern Wells Church of England Primary School
- URN verified
116902
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Systems for checking the quality of teaching and learning are not always timely and effective. p.1
- Typically, there is little disruption to learning in lessons, although at times pupils lose attentiveness when the work is not challenging or the task is not clear. p.6
- There are weaknesses in the way that school improvement systems are led and managed. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, by ensuring that teachers: – provide greater levels of challenge, especially for the most able pupils, particularly p.2
- Some aspects of school improvement lack rigour and attention to detail. p.3
- Improvement actions and initiatives are not always linked to, or evaluated against, the key priorities and timescales set in the school development plan. p.3
- Consequently, some areas for improvement, such as the teaching of writing, have not been addressed effectively. p.3
- Leaders have recently introduced a system that identifies pupils’ progress against their prior learning. p.3
- This is helping teachers and leaders to focus more closely on the progress that pupils are making over time. p.3
- However, not all leaders fully understand or use this information effectively enough to drive improvements across the school. p.3
- There remains an overemphasis on improving pupils’ progress quickly when they enter Year 6. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 12
- Words of findings
- 3,076
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Malvern Wells Church of England Primary School 263 Wells Road, Malvern Wells, Worcestershire WR14 4HF
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
There are weaknesses in the way that school improvement systems are led and managed. As a result, some ongoing areas for improvement have not been effectively addressed. Systems for checking the quality of teaching and learning are not always timely and effective. Too few pupils make strong progress in writing across Years 1 to 6. Pupils’ progress in writing across key stage 2 has been well below the national average for the last two years. Consistency in the quality and approach to the teaching of writing is not secure across the school. Leadership of the provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is in the early stages of development. The quality of teaching is not consistently good. Teachers do not always provide sufficient challenge to ensure that the most able pupils make strong progress, particularly in mathematics and writing. Pupils do not have enough opportunities to
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
secure and apply their writing skills accurately in English and across other subjects. Effective plans are not in place to ensure that pupils develop secure, subject-specific knowledge, understanding and skills in subjects other than English, mathematics and science.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The quality of teaching and pupils’ progress in mathematics are improving at a good pace across the school. An increasing proportion of pupils are working at higher standards in mathematics. Children in early years receive a good start to their education. Careful nurturing, combined with skilful teaching, ensures that children make strong progress. The teaching of early reading is improving. Leaders have recently taken action to make sure that reading books are well matched to children’s phonic skills. This is having a positive impact. Pupils demonstrate a good understanding of other faiths and British values. They are developing a secure grounding for life in modern Britain.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management, by: – establishing rigorous school improvement systems so that all of the school’s areas for improvement are addressed effectively, within given timescales – introducing timely and effective systems to check that teachers are swiftly making the necessary improvements to their practice – securing consistency in the quality and approach to the teaching of writing across the school so that more pupils, across Years 1 to 6, make strong progress – sustaining and building on recent improvements to the provision for pupils with SEND so that these pupils achieve well – ensuring that pupils develop secure, subject-specific knowledge, understanding and skills in subjects other than English, mathematics and science. Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, by ensuring that teachers: – provide greater levels of challenge, especially for the most able pupils, particularly
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
in mathematics and writing – use effective and consistent methods to help pupils to secure and apply their writing skills accurately in English and other subjects.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Some aspects of school improvement lack rigour and attention to detail. Improvement actions and initiatives are not always linked to, or evaluated against, the key priorities and timescales set in the school development plan. Consequently, some areas for improvement, such as the teaching of writing, have not been addressed effectively. Leaders have recently introduced a system that identifies pupils’ progress against their prior learning. This is helping teachers and leaders to focus more closely on the progress that pupils are making over time. However, not all leaders fully understand or use this information effectively enough to drive improvements across the school. There remains an overemphasis on improving pupils’ progress quickly when they enter Year 6. Although leaders look at the work in pupils’ books and the teaching in the classrooms, there is no clear, systematic approach to the monitoring of the quality of teaching and
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
learning. Leaders do not always identify precisely what teachers are doing well and what they need to do to improve. Leaders do not all check that teachers are swiftly making necessary improvements to their practice. As a result, inconsistencies in the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress have not been addressed quickly. The newly formed governing body swiftly identified the need to increase leadership capacity in order to drive school improvement. To address this, in September 2018, it restructured the leadership team and appointed two assistant headteachers. This has strengthened the capacity for improvement. The two new assistant headteachers have made a positive impact on the school. They have a good understanding of the school’s systems for judging pupils’ progress. They are effectively using their analysis of this information to drive improvements to teaching and learning. This is particularly evident in mathematics and in early years. It
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
is too early to see the impact on wider school improvement systems and other key priorities. Leaders have recently introduced new systems to support pupils with SEND. Plans for each pupil are detailed. These record the extra support and intervention programmes that are in place. Leaders frequently check that plans are working well and making a difference to pupils’ achievement. Parents and carers say that they recognise and appreciate the changes. Further work is needed to make sure that the support and resources provided in all classes are well matched to pupils’ needs. Leaders and governors make sure that the additional funding for the small number of disadvantaged pupils is used effectively. Teachers and teaching assistants work well together to make sure that extra support has a positive impact on pupils’ achievement and well-being. As a result, the progress of disadvantaged pupils is in line with the
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
progress of other pupils nationally. Pupils enjoy physical education (PE) and the school is making good use of the additional PE and sport premium funding to develop teachers’ skills. Pupils also value the range of after-school activities on offer and the many opportunities to participate in sporting events, such as the recent rounders festival at the Chase. The school teaches national curriculum subjects through specific themes, as part of a ‘skills-based, creative curriculum’. Pupils particularly enjoy the links made between subjects and can talk about the activities that they have done, such as designing and building model longboats in their Viking topic. However, more work is needed to ensure that subjects are planned with a clear path of progression. This lack of secure, subject-specific knowledge and skills is evident in pupils’ work and when they talk about topic work. Although this has been recognised,
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
plans to address this across the school lack clarity.
p.4
Governance of the school
The newly restructured governing body has recognised the need to strengthen the leadership team. It responded in a timely fashion. Governors are working closely with the diocese and the local authority to make sure that these changes make a positive difference to the pace of school improvement. Governors have an accurate and comprehensive picture of the school’s strengths and areas that need further development. They use published information about pupils’ achievement to judge how well pupils are doing when compared with other pupils nationally. Documentation shows that governors raise meaningful and pertinent questions. They take actions where necessary to make sure that the school continues to improve. Link governors work closely with the leaders for mathematics and English. Governors work effectively with the school to ensure that safeguarding arrangements are thorough. They carry out regular checks on different aspects of safeguarding,
p.4
Governance of the school
including online safety and staff recruitment. Through regular training, staff and governors have an up-to-date knowledge of procedures and understand the importance of being vigilant.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. There is an effective culture of safeguarding within the school. All safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and the school provides a safe environment for all pupils. Pupils feel safe and cared for. Their comments include: ‘We can go to anyone in the school if we are worried. It’s just the nearest person to you because they will all listen and help.’ All staff, including lunchtime staff, understand their responsibilities to safeguard pupils. Leaders and governors are suitably trained in safer recruitment. Rigorous procedures are in place for checking the suitability of visitors and any supply staff. There are clear systems in place to make sure that pupils and families get the support that they need. Pupils at risk are closely monitored. Day-to-day records and notes are kept appropriately. Actions are followed through, but not always carefully noted and
p.4
Safeguarding
dated. Steps have been taken to address this.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
There has been a lack of consistency in teaching over time. Teaching is improving, particularly in mathematics where there is a clear focus and approach to teaching across the school. This is because of the subject leader’s focused support, new resources and effective use of professional development. However, this has not yet led to consistently strong progress for all groups of pupils across the school. Where teaching is strong, teachers use their knowledge of pupils’ prior learning to build on what pupils know and what they need to do next. During the inspection, pupils were challenged to use their knowledge of shapes and their properties to discuss lines of symmetry and different orientations. They used mathematical language to explain their reasoning. They clearly had to think hard and enjoyed the challenge. However, work in pupils’ books across Years 1 to 6 shows that this level of challenge, particularly for
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
most-able pupils, is inconsistent across the school. Work is under way to address this. The teaching of English is not securely good. The use of ‘non-negotiables’ has been introduced to remind pupils of the importance of spelling and punctuation. However, this is not fully effective in all classes. For example, some pupils have weaknesses or misconceptions in basic writing skills, such as letter formation and sentence construction. These errors are not routinely addressed as part of everyday teaching. This hinders pupils’ progress in writing. Teachers plan opportunities for pupils to write at length, particularly in English and topic work. However, systems are not in place to check that this is helping pupils to improve the quality of their writing or deepen their understanding of the writing process. For example, there are too few opportunities for pupils to make choices about how to organise their writing and to plan or edit their work. This prevents pupils,
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
especially the most able pupils, from working at higher standards in writing. The teaching of phonics is effective. Pupils use their phonic skills to read unknown words. They are encouraged to use their phonic skills to help them to write and spell. Over time, the vast majority of pupils have met the standard of the Year 1 phonics screening check. Leaders have recently introduced new early reading books to ensure that reading books are well matched to the sounds that pupils have been taught. This helps pupils to read accurately and with growing confident and fluency. Teachers in every class read to pupils every day. Pupils talk enthusiastically about their class readers, such as ‘Kensuke’s Kingdom’. These activities foster a love of reading. An increasing proportion of pupils are reading at higher levels across the school.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. The school is particularly good at helping pupils to develop into confident, self-aware young people. The school’s values of empathy and respect are at the heart of daily school life. This is evident in the respectful relationships and the care and compassion pupils demonstrate towards each other. Pupils have a good understanding of different types of bullying. They know what to do if they are worried about anything. Pupils’ comments include: ‘We have golden rules in every classroom. Mostly, we don’t need to use them because behaviour is pretty good here.’ Pupils speak with great enthusiasm about school trips, such as to the Malvern Theatres’ production of ‘Beowulf’ and the residential visits to Wales. They are happy and demonstrate a love of learning. Pupils’ comments include: ‘Learning at this school is fun. We do a lot of work in one day.’
p.5
Personal development and welfare
Provision for pupils’ spiritual development is a strength. Pupils take part in daily acts of worship and are provided with opportunities for thoughtful reflection. They are encouraged to appreciate and understand other religions. This contributes to their development as well-rounded individuals and prepares them well for life in modern Britain.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils and parents are positive about behaviour in the school. Typically, there is little disruption to learning in lessons, although at times pupils lose attentiveness when the work is not challenging or the task is not clear. This slows the pace of learning. Parents value the benefits of a small village school and feel that children are well nurtured. All of the parents that I spoke to and the vast majority of parents who responded to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire said that their children are happy at school and they would recommend it to another parent. Older pupils particularly enjoy taking responsibility for looking after the younger pupils on the playground. They are good role models and show pride and respect for the school grounds and property. Pupils’ attendance is above the national average for other primary schools. The monitoring of attendance is rigorous and the school has high expectations of pupils and
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
In 2018, by the end of Year 6, there was a slight dip in pupils’ attainment. The proportion of pupils who achieved the expected standards in reading and writing was broadly in line with the national average. In mathematics, the proportion of pupils achieving the expected standard was below the national average. However, over three years, by the end of key stage 2, the standard of pupils’ attainment in reading, writing and mathematics combined is above the national average. Nevertheless, across key stage 2, pupils’ progress in writing has been in the lowest 20% of all primary schools nationally for the last two years. Actions to address this have not been effective or urgent enough. Work in pupils’ books and the school’s assessment records show early signs of improvement. The strongest improvement in pupils’ writing is seen in Year 6. This is due to the quality of teaching and targeting for these pupils. However, across the rest of the
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
school, not enough pupils are making the progress that they should in writing. This is especially so for the most able pupils and lower-ability pupils. Over recent years, across key stage 2, pupils have not made good enough progress in mathematics. By the end of Year 6 in 2018, pupils’ progress in mathematics was well below that of other schools nationally. Leaders have recently taken effective actions to address this. Radical changes have been made to the way that mathematics is taught across the school. Work in pupils’ books shows that pupils are more focused on reasoning mathematically and applying their mathematical knowledge and skills to solve problems. Pupils enjoy mathematics and demonstrate resilience in problem-solving activities. Early evidence shows that an increasing proportion of pupils are working at higher standards in all classes. Lower-ability pupils are given more opportunities to secure
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
their mathematical knowledge and understanding. An increasing proportion of pupils are catching up in their learning. Further work is needed to secure and sustain these improvements. Recent improvements in the education of pupils with SEND mean that they are making better progress. Pupils are provided with a range of different interventions to support their needs. While the progress that they make in the interventions is secure, they do not always receive work and/or resources to match their needs in class. As a result, they do not make strong progress overall. In 2018, all pupils achieved the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check. Pupils in danger of falling behind in reading are given extra support immediately. Teachers make sure that books are well matched to the sounds that they can read. As a result, lower-ability pupils are making strong progress and catching up quickly.
p.7
Early years provision Good
Children make good progress across early years and enjoy their learning. The proportion of children who achieve a good level of development has steadily increased over the last three years and is in line with the national average. Children are well prepared to start Year 1. Children throughout early years behave well and are happy and settled. This is because routines are well established and relationships are strong. Safeguarding and statutory requirements are met. The new early years leader is skilled and knowledgeable about this stage of children’s learning and development. She has swiftly and accurately identified strengths and areas for development. Improvement plans for early years are based on rigorous evaluation and precise targets. Professional development opportunities are tailored to need and well planned. Staff work effectively together. The teaching of phonics is good. Adults encourage children to use their phonics skills to
p.7
Early years provision Good
match sounds to letters as they are writing. This helps children with spelling. New approaches have been introduced to improve the way that children are taught essential key writing skills, such as how to hold a pencil and to develop a good writing posture. This has shone a spotlight on the importance of mark-making to support early writing. It is too early to see the impact of these changes. Stories and role-play opportunities are planned, indoors and outdoors, to encourage children to speak and listen to each other and extend their imagination. Children enjoy reciting nursery rhymes and songs as part of daily routines. They eagerly re-tell familiar stories and talk about their favourite characters. As a result of these activities, children are confident to talk about their ideas and demonstrate a love of reading. This was evident during the inspection when children were using equipment in the
p.8
Early years provision Good
outdoor kitchen to experiment with juice-making. They used equipment confidently, including juice squeezers and water jugs, to measure and select from different materials. They eagerly explained that they were making fresh juice for ‘Mr Grinling, the Lighthouse Keeper’. Children demonstrated self-confidence and self-awareness, helping each other to fill and empty water containers, using equipment carefully and taking turns. These activities also gave children time to practise and extend their mathematical knowledge and understanding. Parents feel involved in their children’s start at school. Work is under way to ensure that all parents know how to support their children with the new reading books that are closely matched to children’s phonics skills.
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.9
School details
Email address head@malvern-wells.worcs.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 5–6 February 2014
p.9
Information about this school
The school is smaller than the average-sized primary school. There are four mixed-age group classes. Almost all of the pupils are from White British backgrounds and speak English as their first language. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils who are supported by the pupil premium funding is lower than the national average. The proportion of pupils with SEND is lower than the national average. Numbers of these pupils can vary because of the small cohorts of pupils. There are no pupils with an education, health and care plan in place. The local authority and the diocese support the school through reviews and recommendations. Two new assistant headteachers were appointed in September 2018. Since the previous section 5 inspection in February 2014, the governing body has appointed a new chair and vice-chair of governors. Three new governors have joined the governing body. This is a Church of England school. The last inspection of the denominational education
p.9
Information about this school
given to pupils and the content of the school’s collective worship, under section 48 of the Education Act 2005, was conducted on 13 October 2014.
p.10
Information about this inspection
The inspector jointly observed teaching in all classes, accompanied at times by the headteacher. The inspector met with the headteacher and assistant headteachers. They looked at work in pupils’ books and at assessments of pupils’ current attainment and progress. A number of documents were reviewed, including the school’s records of recruitment and vetting checks, a range of documents relating to safeguarding pupils, the school’s self-evaluation and plans for improvement, and minutes of governing body meetings. The inspector met with the chair and vice-chair of the governing body and six other governors. She held telephone conversations with representatives from the local authority and the diocese. The inspector spoke informally to pupils, parents and staff at various times during the inspection, including breaktime, lunchtime and at each end of the school day. She also heard pupils read and talked to them about their reading in school and at home.
p.11
Information about this inspection
The inspector also considered 47 responses from Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, including 12 responses made through the free-text service.
p.11
Inspection team
Marilyn Mottram, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.12
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.12
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.12
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.12
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.12
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.12
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion