Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's home run by Keys Group Progressive Care & Education Limited in Birmingham

Inspected 31 Jul 2019 · URN 1247491

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Keys Group Progressive Care & Education Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    31 Jul 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Elaine Allison

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    1247491

  • URN verified

    1247491

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementRI to be good

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−0Mixedmore positive than 14% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentconfidentpositivegood progresssafeeffectiveclearnurturing
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysfailedrequires improvementconcernsdeclinedlackslack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1217w+6
  • What needs to improve323w−45

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,520
about usual (typical 1319)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 51
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 4
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Inspection report children‟s home: 1247491 1 Registered provider: Keys Group Progressive Care & Education Limited

p.1

Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The home is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to four children who may have learning disabilities. The home is privately owned and managed. The manager has been registered with Ofsted since 31 January 2019.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good

p.1

good

The children‟s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of last inspection: 29 November 2018

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: good

p.1

good

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report children‟s home: 1247491 2

p.1

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

29/11/2018 Full Good 14/03/2018 Interim Improved effectiveness 31/10/2017 Full Good 11/01/2017 Interim Sustained effectiveness Inspection report children‟s home: 1247491 3

p.2

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children‟s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the „Guide to the children‟s homes regulations including the quality standards‟. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.3

Requirement Due date

In order to meet the leadership and management standard, the provider should—

p.3

Requirement Due date

ensure that the staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child;

p.3

Requirement Due date

ensure that staff understand the impact that the quality of care provided in the home is having on the progress and experiences of each child and use this understanding to inform the development of the quality of care provided in the home;

p.3

Requirement Due date

use monitoring and review systems to make continuous improvements in the quality of care provided in the home. (Regulation 13 (2)(c)(f)(g)) 30/08/2019

p.3

Requirement Due date

The registered person must ensure that all employees receive practice-related supervision. (Regulation 33(4)(b)) 30/08/2019

p.3

Requirement Due date

The registered person must complete a review of the quality of care provided for children (“a quality of care review”) at least once every 6 months.

p.3

Requirement Due date

The registered person must— supply to HMCI a copy of the quality of care review report within 28 days of the date on which the quality of care review is completed;

p.3

Requirement Due date

and make a copy of the quality of care review report available on request to a placing authority, if the placing authority is not the parent of a child accommodated in the home. (Regulation 45(1)(4)(a)(b)) 30/08/2019 Inspection report children‟s home: 1247491 4

p.3

Recommendations

Staff should be familiar with the home‟s policies on record keeping and understand the importance of careful, objective and clear recording. Staff should record information on individual children in a non-stigmatising way that distinguishes between fact, opinion and third-party information. Information about the child must always be recorded in a way that will be helpful to the child. („Guide to the children‟s home regulations including the quality standards‟, page 62, paragraph 14.4)

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Young people make very good progress because of their good-quality, nurturing relationships with staff. Staff are skilled and adept at building relationships with young people. Interactions observed during the inspection were relaxed and in the young person‟s preferred communication style.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff offer young people a wide range of activities to explore, experience and integrate within the local community, for example trips to the local park, amusement parks and local restaurants. Staff are creative and confident, and provide opportunities that young people may not previously have had. The staff‟s ethos is that risk assessments should be enabling rather than disabling. Consequently, young people receive support to undertake new and exciting experiences.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Progress for young people is evident, including the development of their confidence in spending time with their parents. One parent said, „My son didn‟t want to spend time with me. Now he phones me every day and I go out with him and staff. I am so proud of the progress he has made.‟

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff have registered young people with a range of external services, including GPs, opticians and dentists. They proactively liaise with external colleagues to review each young person‟s physical health and matters of well-being. Recorded health plans help the team to keep up to date with individual young people‟s current issues. This prioritises their unique needs and results in them making significant progress in meeting developmental milestones, for example in self-care.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

There continues to be good education provision in place for all young people. Key workers attend and contribute to review meetings so that they are aware of any changes. Communication between the home and the school is very good, and information regarding young people‟s anxieties, behaviours and general moods is shared to ensure that there is a consistent level of care in both settings. Inspection report children‟s home: 1247491 5

p.4

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Young people live in a safe home, where they are protected from harm. Staff understand good safeguarding practice, including knowing to whom they need to report concerns.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Individual placement plans, behaviour plans, risk assessments and health plans are of a good quality. Documentation clearly describes the work undertaken towards meeting health, behavioural and care needs. Any potential risks are swiftly identified, and plans are updated.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Young people do not go missing from the home. This is because of the high staffing levels in place, and because staff have a very good understanding of the needs and vulnerabilities of each young person. Staff are clear about the action to take should a child go missing.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Young people are observed to be happy, relaxed and settled in their home. One young person told the inspector that the home was „a nice place‟ and that staff were „really good fun‟. Observations of staff interaction and supervision of young people indicated that staff were very alert to any potential risks to young people‟s safety. The close supervision and high staffing ratios do not impact on the domestic, homely environment.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Risk assessments and care plans are reviewed to reflect the changing needs of young people. Young people are supported by staff to manage their behaviour with individual risk assessments and behaviour support plans detailing triggers, behaviours, strategies for de-escalation and intervention. Staff are calm and consistent in their approach as they support young people in times of high anxiety. Young people have an awareness of the boundaries and have a good understanding of their routines, knowing what is expected of them. The home does not use sanctions as this would have little effect due to the cognitive level of understanding of the young people.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff follow the home‟s policy and procedure when administering medication. Staff undertake training and are observed and assessed during administration to ensure that they comply with the procedure. Medication is stored as required, with regular review and audit.

p.5

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff recruitment is safe. All staff are carefully vetted before starting work in the home. This ensures that young people are cared for by people who are assessed as being safe.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Following the last inspection, the registered manager was absent from work for a significant period. Although temporary management arrangements were put in place, the management oversight of the home declined. Senior managers were alert to the shortfalls, and instigated protocols to improve the management of the home. However, despite substantial improvements, the process to implement the management audits is Inspection report children‟s home: 1247491 6 ongoing.

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

The monitoring of incidents by the registered manager lacks rigour and evaluation. Staff do not always complete behaviour management records, including records relating to physical interventions, to an acceptable standard. Managers have failed to note that these documents do not always specify that de-briefs have taken place. To date, these weaknesses have not had an impact on the safety and welfare of young people, but they have the potential to do so if not rectified. Furthermore, the manager has not undertaken a review of the quality of care within the required timeframe. This means that opportunities to identify strengths and weaknesses are being missed.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Staff feel valued and supported by the interim management team. However, in the absence of the registered manager, some staff have not received regular supervision in recent months. The lack of regular supervision does not enable staff to reflect on their practice and identify any further training that they need to support their continued professional development.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

The team morale is positive. It is due to the motivated and confident staff team that firm boundaries for young people are being instilled. Staff speak in complimentary terms about the young people and express positive regard towards them. Staff feel supported by the interim manager and senior managers and find working at the home a pleasurable experience. One staff member said, „We are like a family here. We look out for one another. It‟s a good place to work.‟

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Professionals and family members speak positively about the quality of care provided by the staff and the quality of the communication shared with them. A social worker commented, „Communication between the staff, parents and I is excellent.‟

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

Permanent staff members are trained to a high level to meet the needs of the young people. However, agency staff have not been trained in the provider‟s approved behaviour management strategies.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: requires improvement to be good

The interim manager and the director of residential care fully acknowledge all shortfalls raised at this inspection. They recognise how these shortfalls impact on the day-to-day running of the home and the outcomes for young people. They show capacity and enthusiasm to make all the required improvements, including introducing more robust systems to ensure that young people‟s care planning, safety and well-being are prioritised. Inspection report children‟s home: 1247491 7

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children‟s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.7

Information about this inspection

Using the „Social care common inspection framework‟, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children‟s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the „Guide to the children‟s homes regulations including the quality standards‟. Inspection report children‟s home: 1247491 8

p.7

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Keys Group Progressive Care & Education Limited

p.8

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: Maybrook House, 2nd Floor, Queensway, Halesowen, Worcestershire B63 4AH

p.8

Children’s home details

Responsible individual: Melanie McGuinness

p.8

Inspector

Elaine Allison, social care inspector Inspection report children‟s home: 1247491 9 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children‟s social care and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children‟s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion