Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Independent school inspection

Catch22 Include Bristol

Inspected 20 Jun 2019 · URN 134441

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tonwen Empson (lead), Martin Bragg

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Jun 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Martin Bragg, Tonwen Empson

  • Postcode verified

    BS2 8SF

  • Name on report verified

    Catch22 Include Bristol

  • URN verified

    134441

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−30Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyconsistentlyeffectiveimprovinghigh expectationspositivelyindependentstrong
Criticismnot metpoorconcernsnot effectivenot securelacktoo fewtoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings2387w−39
  • Leadership71w+67
  • What needs to improve72w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,474
longer than usual (typical 1813)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 49
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 80%Leadership 2%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 15%

Full report text

School progress monitoring inspection report

p.1

Catch22 Include Bristol 6–7 Dean Street, St Paul’s, Bristol, Avon BS2 8SF

p.1

Main inspection findings

Part 1. Quality of education provided Paragraphs 2(1)(a), 2(1)(b)(i), 2(2)(a), 2(2)(b), 2(2)(g)–(i)

p.1

Main inspection findings

 At the full standard inspection in January 2019, it was found that the school’s curriculum did not enable pupils to acquire knowledge across subjects. In addition, the curriculum did not consider the ages, aptitudes and needs of pupils, including pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND).  The inspection also found that staff were not knowledgeable about how to provide an appropriate curriculum to develop pupils’ skills, knowledge and understanding. In addition, too many pupils were found to be on part-time timetables and not accessing school for their full entitlement.  Leaders have worked with urgency to extend pupils’ attendance. As a result, fewer pupils are now on reduced timetables. For those who remain on part-time timetables, appropriate plans are in place and more are moving towards a full timetable.  Leaders have worked to review curriculum plans and to develop alternative pathways to

p.1

Main inspection findings

more closely match pupils’ interests and needs. However, these are yet to be fully introduced across all the school’s sites.  Since the standard inspection, staff have not had additional professional development to support their knowledge of how to develop pupils’ skills, knowledge and understanding. In part, this is because professional development has been more focused on ensuring that staff have good knowledge of safeguarding. Where improvements to teaching and learning have been instigated by subject leaders, leaders cannot show that these changes are being applied effectively across all sites.  Individual plans for pupils with SEND are now reviewed more often to ensure that they are more relevant to pupils’ needs. However, the targets set are broad and difficult to measure. Therefore, pupils’ plans are not effective in ensuring that pupils acquire speaking, listening, literacy and numeracy skills.

p.1

Main inspection findings

 Although some improvements have been made to reduce the number of pupils on part- time timetables, other aspects of improving the curriculum to meet pupils’ needs are not secure. Therefore, leaders have not ensured that these standards are met. Paragraphs 3, 3(a)–3(h)  This standard was found to be not met at the standard inspection because pupils were making poor progress. Staff did not ensure that teaching was suitably challenging by considering what pupils already know, understand and can do. Planning was found to be weak as lessons over time did not secure strong understanding.  The teaching of core subjects such as mathematics was found to be poor. English teaching varied in quality. Some staff use questioning effectively to help move pupils’ understanding forwards. At other times, staff were providing too much support, resulting in a lack of challenge and low expectations.  With support from the trust, leaders have established new structures and systems to

p.1

Main inspection findings

improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Lead practitioners support English, mathematics, science, personal development and behaviour. A new cycle of monitoring has begun across the school sites. This involves visits to see learning, looking in books and having discussions with staff. Leaders have not yet been able to show evidence of the impact these systems on improving the quality of teaching, learning and assessment across the different school sites.  Where lead practitioners have introduced clear strategies and higher expectations, leaders are not able to show how this has been consistently applied across all sites. For example, the teaching of English remains variable across the sites. Furthermore, pupils’ workbooks show that the feedback provided to pupils does not help them well enough to move forward with their learning.  Teaching assistants provide extra pastoral support for pupils; however, in lessons their

p.2

Main inspection findings

role is not clearly defined. Too often, as found at the previous inspection, pupils’ ability to build resilience and independence is weakened by too much support from adults.  Leaders have introduced sharper, better-organised assessments that take place when a pupil arrives at the school. However, it is too soon to see the impact of this and other newly introduced assessment procedures.  Although new systems to monitor the quality of teaching, learning and assessment have been introduced, they have not been in place long enough to promote high expectations across all sites. The quality of teaching and learning remains too variable. Therefore, leaders have not ensured that these standards are met.

p.2

Main inspection findings

Part 2. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils Paragraph 5, 5(b)(iii)  The standard inspection also found that the principles of spiritual, moral social and cultural development did not support pupils to contribute positively to the lives of those living and working in the locality of the school and society more widely.  Although the curriculum is developing, leaders have not yet established how pupils will make contributions to their locality and to society as a whole.  Leaders have not ensured that this standard is met. Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraph 7, 7(a), 7(b), 16(b)  These standards were not met at the standard inspection because staff were found to be not routinely recording concerns about pupils’ welfare. This included pupils with poor attendance and those who could be missing from education. In addition, there were examples of unlawful exclusions and incorrect procedures in place to check pupils’

p.2

Main inspection findings

attendance.  Leaders have conducted a ‘root and branch’ review of all procedures and processes related to safeguarding. The trust has ensured that this has taken place and have reviewed progress carefully. A new, robust system to record concerns made by staff is now in place across all sites. Training for staff has ensured that they are now clear about their responsibilities and know the processes involved in reporting concerns. Chronologies are in place to ensure that leaders are able to make good decisions about concerns raised.  Leaders have ensured that safeguarding training for staff has been the top priority. The leaders for safeguarding for each site have had considerable additional training to equip them well for their roles.  Staff have received training on safeguarding, covering issues such as preventing radicalisation, child sexual exploitation and sexual violence. Daily briefings for all staff

p.3

Main inspection findings

ensure that they have regular reminders about key safeguarding messages.  Recruitment procedures meet requirements and safeguarding checks are recorded appropriately on the school’s single central record.  Leaders have ensured that registers accurately record pupils’ absence. Checks are made and rigorously followed up when pupils do not attend school. Risk assessments for pupils, including for those not attending school, have been reviewed and improved.  As a result of the focus on improving safeguarding following the previous inspection, leaders have ensured that these standards are now met. Paragraph 9, 9(b)  This standard was not met at the standard inspection because the number of behavioural incidents and exclusions were high and too few pupils attended school regularly.  Leaders are doing the right things to build strong foundations to support good behaviour and raise expectations for how pupils conduct themselves. Clearer systems to reward

p.3

Main inspection findings

behaviour are in place. Behaviour contracts have been discussed and agreed with pupils and their parents. As a result, exclusions have reduced.  However, leaders are at the early stages of analysing behaviour across the different sites. They do not ensure that they are able to identify successes and weaknesses in how staff are implementing the behaviour policy and managing pupils’ behaviour.  Pupils’ attendance remains very low. Leaders are not able to demonstrate how their actions are improving attendance for pupils consistently across all sites. Too few pupils accept responsibility for their behaviour, through their lack of attendance at school.  Leaders have not ensured that this standard is met. Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraph 34(1), 34(1)(a)–(c)  This standard was not met at the standard inspection because the proprietor and leaders had not ensured that the independent school standards were met. It was found that the

p.3

Main inspection findings

proprietor had not taken effective action to halt the school’s decline and that checks made on school performance were not effective. The checks on safeguarding lacked rigour.  Since the inspection, the proprietor has ensured that the actions taken have secured the required improvements to safeguarding and this standard is now met. However, there remain unmet standards, particularly related to the quality of teaching, learning and assessment.  Systems to make improvements are at an early stage and have not secured a good quality of education for pupils across each of the school’s many sites.  In addition, pupils’ attendance remains very low, with far too many pupils not attending school regularly.  Leaders have not ensured that the standards in this paragraph is met.

p.4

Compliance with regulatory requirements

The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection, as set out in the annex of this report. This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection.

p.5

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

 7 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that– – 7(a) arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and – 7(b) such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.  16 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that--

p.5

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

– 16(b) appropriate action is taken to reduce risks that are identified.

p.5

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.

p.6

School details

Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed

p.6

School details

Email address Mark.kennedy@catch-22.org.uk

p.6

School details

Date of previous standard inspection 22–24 January 2019

p.6

Information about this school

 The school is part of the Catch22 group. The school uses seven sites. Four of these sites are in Bristol: Kingswood, Dean Street, Silver Thorne and Bedminster. The other sites are in Trowbridge, Chippenham and Midsomer Norton.  There is a proprietor and a board of trustees who oversee the work of Catch22 Include Bristol.  The school has designated leaders for each of the seven sites. These are known as curriculum learning leaders.  Most pupils have been withdrawn or excluded from their previous school or education. Many pupils have education, health and care plans, usually relating to their social, emotional and mental health needs.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 This inspection was carried out at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. The purpose of the inspection was to monitor the progress the school has made in meeting the independent school standards and other requirements that it was judged to not comply with at its previous inspection.  This inspection was the first progress monitoring inspection to take place following the full standard inspection in January 2019. This inspection found the school to be inadequate, with several of the independent school standards not met.  The Department for Education served a statutory notice to the school, requiring the school to prepare an action plan.  Ofsted evaluated the school’s plan on 18 April 2019 and found it to be acceptable with modifications.  This inspection was carried out with no notice provided to the school.  Inspectors met with the headteacher, the deputy headteachers, two leaders for special

p.8

Information about this inspection

educational needs and some of the curriculum learning leaders. A meeting also took place with the lead practitioner for English. An inspector spoke on the telephone to the executive headteacher and to the chief executive officer of Catch22.  Inspectors considered the school’s self-evaluation, the school development plan, records of leaders’ monitoring, safeguarding audits and records of staff training. In addition, documents related to safeguarding, attendance and behaviour, and information about the curriculum and pupils’ progress were scrutinised. Recruitment procedures, including the school’s single central record, were checked.  Inspectors observed teaching and learning alongside leaders in a sample of sites. Inspectors scrutinised a range of pupils’ workbooks as they observed learning.

p.8

Inspection team

Tonwen Empson, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.8

The school does not meet the following independent school standards

Standards that were not met at the previous inspection and remain un-met at this inspection

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

 2(1) The standard in this paragraph is met if–

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 2(1)(a) the proprietor ensures that a written policy on the curriculum, supported by appropriate plans and schemes of work, which provides for the matters specified in sub- paragraph (2) is drawn up and implemented effectively; and

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 2(1)(b) the written policy, plans and schemes of work–

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 2(1)(b)(i) take into account the ages, aptitudes and needs of all pupils, including those pupils with an EHC plan.

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

 2(2) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(1)(a), the matters are–

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 2(2)(a) full-time supervised education for pupils of compulsory school age (construed in accordance with section 8 of the Education Act 1996), which gives pupils experience in linguistic, mathematical, scientific, technological, human and social, physical and aesthetic and creative education

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 2(2)(b) that pupils acquire speaking, listening, literacy and numeracy skills

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 2(2)(g) where the school has pupils above compulsory school age, a programme of activities which is appropriate to their needs

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 2(2)(h) that all pupils have the opportunity to learn and make progress; and

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 2(2)(i) effective preparation of pupils for the opportunities, responsibilities and experiences of life in British society.

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

 3 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that the teaching at the school–

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 3(a) enables pupils to acquire new knowledge and make good progress according to their ability so that they increase their understanding and develop their skills in the subjects taught

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 3(b) fosters in pupils self-motivation, the application of intellectual, physical and creative effort, interest in their work and the ability to think and learn for themselves

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 3(c) involves well planned lessons and effective teaching methods, activities and management of class time – 3(d) shows a good understanding of the aptitudes, needs and prior attainments of the pupils, and ensures that these are taken into account in the planning of lessons

p.9

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 3(e) demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of the subject matter being taught

p.10

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 3(f) utilises effectively classroom resources of a good quality, quantity and range

p.10

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 3(g) demonstrates that a framework is in place to assess pupils’ work regularly and thoroughly and use information from that assessment to plan teaching so that pupils can progress

p.10

Part 1. Quality of education provided

– 3(h) utilises effective strategies for managing behaviour and encouraging pupils to act responsibly.

p.10

Part 2. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils

 5 The standard about the spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils at the school is met if the proprietor ensures that principles are actively promoted which–

p.10

Part 2. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils

– 5(b)(iii) encourage pupils to accept responsibility for their behaviour, show initiative and understand how they can contribute positively to the lives of those living and working in the locality in which the school is situated and to society more widely.

p.10

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

 9 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor promotes good behaviour amongst pupils by ensuring that–

p.10

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

– 9(b) the policy is implemented effectively.

p.10

Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools

 34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school–

p.10

Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools

– 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently

p.10

Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools

– 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and

p.10

Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools

– 34(1)(c) actively promote the well-being of pupils.

p.10

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

 7 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that– – 7(a) arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and – 7(b) such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.

p.11

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

 16 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that--

p.11

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

– 16(b) appropriate action is taken to reduce risks that are identified. guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.12

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visitwww.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.12

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.12

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.12

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.12

Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion