Other · Ofsted report
London School Of Commerce & It Limited
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
18 Jul 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Jane Hughes
- Postcode verified
E1 1EJ
- Name on report verified
London School of Commerce & IT Limited
- URN verified
1270862
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 25
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 8 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
London School of Commerce & IT Limited Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Jane Hughes, Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.1
Type of provider: Independent learning provider
p.1
Address:
59 66 Greenfield Road London E1 1EJ Monitoring visit: The London School of Commerce & IT Ltd, 17–18 July 2019
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From March 2019, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of adult learning provision which began to be funded from August 2017 or after by the ESFA. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Monitoring visits to providers that are newly directly funded to deliver adult learning provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Established in 2003 to offer higher education courses in education and training, the London School of IT & Commerce Limited is a private training provider based in the City of London. In October 2017, the provider gained an adult education budget to offer short courses to adults in the local area. At the time of the monitoring visit, the provider had nine learners completing entry level 1 functional skills courses in English and mathematics. A further 65 learners had completed courses in 2018/19.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers have not designed and implemented suitable adult learning programmes that meet their objectives of supporting learners to develop their skills and progress in their careers. Leaders’ rationale for offering low-level functional skills courses in English and mathematics to learners with very limited skills in spoken English is not appropriate.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders have not planned to use their funding effectively to help learners build on the skills and knowledge that they gain. Nor do they have strong partnerships with the local job centre, which limits their ability to engage the most disadvantaged learners. There is very little opportunity for learners to move on to the next level of qualification, or to complete more appropriate courses for learners who speak English as an additional language.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers do not measure the impact of their courses sufficiently. They do collect destination data, which confirms that the vast majority of learners stay in their current employment positions. However, they do not check how their courses have developed learners’ English language skills, or have supported them to improve their employment prospects, or to move to the next level of qualification with other providers. Monitoring visit: The London School of Commerce & IT Ltd, 17–18 July 2019 The management of quality assurance and learners’ records is weak. Leaders do not have a good enough understanding of their strengths and weaknesses. Leaders’ observation of teaching and learning is ineffective, as tutors do not recognise that they have been observed. Learners’ progress review records often contain errors. Managers have been slow to withdraw learners who no longer attend their sessions.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Managers and tutors do not use the information they have about learners’ prior skills and knowledge to plan and teach sessions that meet learners’ individual needs. Staff recruit learners onto the same level and length of programme before they check learners’ skills. All learners complete entry level 1 courses in English and mathematics regardless of their starting points, and most learners do not move to the next level.
p.3
Insufficient progress
The vast majority of learners achieve their functional skills qualifications. However, they do not develop sufficiently their English speaking and listening skills. The courses do not help learners to focus on building elementary language skills, such as pronunciation or sentence structure. As a result, learners are unable to conduct basic conversations in English, or to describe how the course helps them to gain the skills they need to develop in their lives, employment or further study.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Tutors give learners detailed feedback on the progress they make at the mid-point reviews. However, they do not follow up on the improvement actions they set for learners. Most learners have the same generic targets set, which do not take into account learners’ individual goals and aspirations. As a result, it is not clear if learners have made sufficient progress in making improvements.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Tutors have suitable qualifications and knowledge of the subjects they teach. They support learners well with resources and tasks to complete outside sessions. Learners appreciate that they can attend sessions on a Saturday. As a result, they do not need to disrupt their working week.
p.3
Insufficient progress
The standard of learners’ assessed work meets the awarding body requirements, and almost all learners achieve high marks at entry level 1.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Monitoring visit: The London School of Commerce & IT Ltd, 17–18 July 2019
p.4
arrangements are in place?
Leaders and managers have put in place appropriate policies and procedures to safeguard adult learners. Leaders ensure that staff working with learners are safe to do so and complete training in safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty.
p.4
arrangements are in place?
The dedicated safeguarding lead and deputy have appropriate qualifications and experience. They have made links with the local authorities to support them in developing their own knowledge about the specific risks associated with extremism and radicalisation in their local area.
p.4
arrangements are in place?
Staff ensure that learners cover safeguarding training during induction and at mid- point progress reviews. Learners confirm through these activities that they feel safe and they know whom to contact should they have any concerns. Monitoring visit: The London School of Commerce & IT Ltd, 17–18 July 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.4
arrangements are in place?
Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
arrangements are in place?
Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
arrangements are in place?
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.5
arrangements are in place?
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
arrangements are in place?
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
arrangements are in place?
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion