Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Kent
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Jul 2019
- Inspectors verified
Jane Winnan
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
126803
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallGood
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
79% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the support for children's learning indoors and outdoors. p.2
- The inspector observed mealtimes and personal hygiene routines, including nappy- changing procedures. p.2
- The inspector evaluated an activity with the childminder and reviewed her systems for monitoring children's progress. p.2
- The inspector discussed the childminder's safeguarding policy and complaints procedure. p.2
- The inspector read the childminder's self-evaluation and took account of parents' comments. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes4
“Children make good progress from their starting points.” p.1Teaching & assessment3
“Risk assessment is effective.” p.3Health & safety3
“Risk assessment is effective.” p.3Safeguarding2
“Safeguarding is effective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 728
- about usual (typical 691)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 49
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date 4 July 2019 Previous inspection date 27 May 2015
p.1
This inspection: Good 2
Previous inspection: Good 2 Effectiveness of leadership and management Good 2 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2 Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2 Outcomes for children Good 2
p.1
This provision is good
n The childminder has a sound knowledge of how to use her ongoing observations to help her assess and plan for children's learning. She focuses well on the prime areas of learning for younger children. Children make good progress from their starting points. n The childminder encourages children to learn about aspects of the wider world in which they live. For example, she takes children out on plenty of interesting outings where they meet new people and learn about the similarities and differences between themselves and others. n The childminder encourages children to manage some tasks for themselves to help enhance their emerging independence and personal skills, such as watering the plants. n The childminder does not maintain an accurate daily record of children's hours of attendance. n Partnership with parents is not fully effective. The childminder does not collect enough information about children's starting points to plan for their settling in.
p.1
This provision is good
n The childminder does not focus sharply enough on self-evaluation. She does not invite parents to comment on the service she provides to help her further improve.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date maintain a daily record of the names of children being cared for on the premises including their hours of attendance. 05/08/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n improve partnership with parents further to share more information about children's starting points to inform planning from the outset n improve self-evaluation further by involving all parents and seeking their views about the service provided to help identify strengths and weaknesses.
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the support for children's learning indoors and outdoors. n The inspector observed mealtimes and personal hygiene routines, including nappy- changing procedures. n The inspector evaluated an activity with the childminder and reviewed her systems for monitoring children's progress. n The inspector discussed the childminder's safeguarding policy and complaints procedure. n The inspector read the childminder's self-evaluation and took account of parents' comments.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management is good
Risk assessment is effective. The childminder is aware of the signs of possible abuse and knows her local referral procedures to help protect children from harm. Safeguarding is effective. She attends training to help improve her practice, such as information sessions about the new inspection framework. The childminder shares with parents the activities children are engaged in, to support learning at home. The childminder does not keep a daily record of children's attendance, so it is unclear which children are attending at any given time. However, this has not had an adverse impact on children's welfare. The childminder's evaluation of her practice is not thorough enough to help keep her knowledge of the statutory requirements up to date.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
The childminder regularly monitors children's progress and accurately identifies where children are doing well. The childminder joins in with the children's play and introduces new words to extend their vocabulary. For example, she teaches the names 'boy' and 'girl' as they play with some small-world figures. Children copy some words that they hear, and follow instructions that the childminder gives to show that they understand. For instance, they follow her to the 'learning room' in the garden to choose songs from song cards and play musical instruments.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good
The childminder does not obtain information from parents about their children's development from the start. Nevertheless, she is attentive to children's care routines. Children eat healthily and sleep according to their individual needs. The childminder is kind and caring and acts as a positive role model to children. She consistently praises children for their achievements and efforts to build on their self-confidence and motivate them to learn. Children behave well. They have plenty of opportunities to be physically active. For example, they play with a wide range of resources readily accessible in the childminder's garden.
p.3
Outcomes for children are good
Younger children explore their environment happily and make confident choices and decisions, such as what to play with. Children develop strong social skills and get along together well. For example, they take their friend's drink to them when they are thirsty. Children develop good physical skills. For example, they enjoy diving in the ball pool and jumping on a low trampoline. Children practise making marks with crayons and learn to operate simple technological toys. They gain the skills needed for the next stage in their learning.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 126803 Local authority Kent Inspection number 10106176 Type of provision Childminder
p.4
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 0 - 3 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 6 Date of previous inspection 27 May 2015
p.4
Registers
The childminder registered in 1999. She lives in Dartford, Kent. The childminder receives funding to provide free early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children. She provides full time care from Tuesday to Friday. The childminder holds a qualification in childcare at level 3.
p.4
Registers
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Registers
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Registers
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Registers
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.5
Registers
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.5
Registers
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion