Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

SHL Training Solutions Ltd

Inspected 25 Jun 2019 · published 2 Aug 2019 · URN 2510853

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ken Fisher

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Jun 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ken Fisher

  • Postcode verified

    SK6 6DE

  • Name on report verified

    SHL Training Solutions Ltd

  • URN verified

    2510853

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
21
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
7 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

SHL Training Solutions Ltd Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Ken Fisher, Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address:

28 Church Lane Marple Stockport Cheshire SK6 6DE Monitoring visit: SHL Training Solutions Ltd, 24–25 June 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

SHL Training Solutions Ltd (SHL) received its first publicly funded contract for levy- funded apprenticeships in May 2017. Currently, 42 apprentices are in training. Of these, 12 are studying at level 2, 25 at level 3, two at level 4 and three at level 5. Twenty-eight apprentices are on standards-based apprenticeships and 14 are on apprenticeship frameworks. Apprentices’ recruitment is to one of nine vocational areas. Those with the most apprentices are team leader/supervisor, business improvement techniques, and supply chain warehouse operative.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Currently, leaders and managers do not have sufficient staff to provide high-quality apprenticeship training. Staff changes have had an adverse impact on apprentices’ progress and on the quality of the apprenticeship provision.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers do not ensure that trainers plan and coordinate on- and off- the-job learning effectively. They are insufficiently aware that too many apprentices do not develop substantial new vocational knowledge, skills, understanding and behaviours. For example, apprentices who have been in the same employment for many years repeat much of what they know and can do already.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers do not ensure that they comply with the principles and requirements of apprenticeships. For example, a large number of apprentices do not have any time during working hours for off-the-job learning. Leaders and managers do not check sufficiently, before recruiting apprentices, that employers will release them for their full entitlement of off-the-job learning.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers do not have oversight of the progress that apprentices make. Their progress tracking is poor. Too many apprentices make slow progress and leaders and managers do not take swift action to rectify this situation. Monitoring visit: SHL Training Solutions Ltd, 24–25 June 2019 Leaders and managers do not identify and eliminate the differences in the quality of the provision. For example, a minority of apprentices receive effective support in English and mathematics, which ensures that they gain their qualifications. However, too many apprentices are slow to start English and mathematics training and their progress is poor.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers do not make sufficient arrangements for apprentices’ assessment at the end of their apprenticeship. Too few standards-based apprentices, and their employers, know what they will have to do to satisfy the final assessment requirements.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers are not held to account for the way in which they lead and manage the apprenticeship provision. They do not have appropriate governance arrangements in place.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Trainers’ target-setting is poor. They place too much emphasis on apprentices completing tasks and units and not enough on the development of their knowledge, skills and behaviours. Targets do not challenge the most able apprentices and ensure that they make rapid progress.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Trainers give insufficient attention to developing all apprentices’ English and mathematics at the start of their apprenticeship. They do not define apprentices’ starting points accurately or use the results effectively to plan individual learning. Assessors do not support apprentices, who have the necessary qualifications in English and mathematics, to develop further.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Most employers and workplace supervisors do not engage effectively with the apprenticeship provision. They do not plan effective on-the-job learning for apprentices. Supervisors do not provide effective support to enable apprentices to develop their vocational knowledge, skills, understanding and behaviours.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Managers’ observations of teaching, learning and progress reviews are insufficiently rigorous. They do not focus sufficiently on what apprentices learn and on their progress. Managers’ action planning, to help trainers to improve, is poor.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Assessors assess apprentices’ work accurately. However, they do not tell apprentices what they can do to improve the standard of their work. Their feedback focuses on what apprentices have done correctly but it is insufficiently developmental. Consequently, too many apprentices are not producing the high-quality answers of which they are capable. Monitoring visit: SHL Training Solutions Ltd, 24–25 June 2019 Assessors visit most apprentices regularly in the workplace. They plan and implement off-the-job learning appropriately. This helps apprentices to fulfil partially the vocational requirements of the occupational standards. Assessors also provide effective pastoral support, when required.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Assessors provide many apprentices with good vocationally specific learning resources. These help them to understand their existing or new job roles better. For example, apprenticeships in customer care have high-quality workbooks that identify how the work they complete develops their vocational knowledge, skills and behaviours.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers do not take sufficient responsibility for the company’s safeguarding arrangements. They have a comprehensive range of safeguarding and safeguarding-related policies and procedures. However, they do not assess the extent to which all members of staff implement them appropriately.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Currently, SHL does not have a designated safeguarding officer (DSO) or deputy DSO. Consequently, apprentices do not have a named person, with relevant training and experience, to contact if safeguarding incidents arise.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Staff training is sporadic and outdated. Leaders and managers do not plan and implement regular and relevant safeguarding training for all members of staff. They do not have clear understanding of who has, and who has not, had an appropriate check and when the checks were made.

p.4

Insufficient progress

Most apprentices have a basic knowledge of safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty. However, trainers do not develop their knowledge and understanding sufficiently to enable them to identify risks confidently and report problems quickly. Monitoring visit: SHL Training Solutions Ltd, 24–25 June 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Insufficient progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.5

Insufficient progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Insufficient progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Insufficient progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion