Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Foundations Matlock

Inspected 10 Jul 2019 · published 30 Jul 2019 · URN 1276009

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Progressive Care Limited

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Jul 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Davinia Lawton, Mary Timms

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    DE4 3DQ

  • Name on report verified

    Foundations Matlock

  • URN verified

    1276009

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+66Positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedeffectivelytrusting relationshipswell plannedclearsuccessfullyconsistently
Criticismweaknesslimitednot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings908w+61
  • What needs to improve107w+64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,012
shorter than usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 43
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential family centre: Foundations Matlock 1 Foundations Matlock Progressive Care Limited Apartments 1–7, Lilybank Court, Matlock, Derbyshire DE4 3DQ Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

This privately owned residential family centre is registered for six families.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

Parenting assessments, for both or either parent, are structured over a 12-week period.

p.1

Information about this residential family centre

The registered manager has worked at the service since the centre opened in July 2018. He is currently working towards the required level 5 diploma in Leadership for Health and Social Care and Children and Young People’s Services.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and parents, taking into account good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

How well children and parents are helped and protected good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

The residential family centre provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Date of previous inspection: 15 October 2018

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Overall judgement at last inspection: the last Ofsted visit was for monitoring purposes and no judgement was made.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for residential family centre: Foundations Matlock 2

p.1

Recommendations

 There should be a clear and effective policy on the use of surveillance in parenting assessments. (National minimum standard 10.1) In particular, the policy and supporting staff training should be formalised to include links to the requirements of GDPR.  Staff members left in charge of the centre have relevant experience of working with families and in residential care settings and have successfully completed their probationary period. (National minimum standard 15.2)  Managers and staff are clear about their roles and responsibilities. The level of delegations and lines of accountability are clearly defined. (National minimum standard 19.3) Inspection report for residential family centre: Foundations Matlock 3

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Families receive good support. Parents are consistently positive when talking about the help and guidance they receive. One parent said that she has become increasingly confident because of the support provided. Parents build trusting relationships with staff. Comments from parents include, ‘The staff do not judge us.’

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Parents have many opportunities to learn new life skills and develop their parenting capacity. Some parents have undertaken foundation skills courses in mathematics and English. Paediatric first-aid training is standard for all parents. Individualised parenting programmes are designed according to assessed needs. Staff also arrange fun activities for families, including craft sessions and group play activities.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Parents have easy access to primary healthcare services. Encouraged by staff, parents improve their knowledge about managing children’s health. There are well- established working relationships with local health visitors and midwives. By working together, parents, staff and professionals ensure that children’s health needs are met.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

In the context of placements mostly being court-directed assessments, parents’ views are sought and considered. Parents confirm that they feel involved, are consulted and that they receive regular feedback.

p.3

Overall experiences and progress of children and parents: good

Assessments are well planned and they prioritise children’s needs. Evidence-based reports are conducted in line with statutory guidance. Reports are evaluative and analytical. An involved professional said that the final assessment report for a recent placement was ‘fair, balanced and well written’. The report enabled the local authority and professionals involved in the court process to understand the parent’s capacity to change.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Care arrangements prioritise the safety and well-being of children and families. The team understands the complex vulnerabilities of each family and its members work together to ensure that they are safe. Parents receive consistent guidance and advice about the safety of their children. Placement and assessment plans focus on the management of known and potential risks. Risk management strategies are regularly reviewed and are implemented effectively.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

The centre has effective links with local authorities and other safeguarding agencies. There is good communication about safeguarding issues and the management of risk.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

The team supports parents to access external agencies for more specialist advice. An example of this is education for parents about the impact of domestic violence on Inspection report for residential family centre: Foundations Matlock 4 families. As a result, parents have an improved understanding of issues that affect children and are supported to make informed decisions.

p.3

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Parents speak confidently about their improved awareness of child safety. As assessments progress, the staff, in consultation with placing teams, support families to demonstrate their ability to keep children safe. When necessary, staff step in promptly to ensure that children are fully protected.

p.4

How well children and parents are helped and protected: good

Generally, the safety of the living environment across the centre is good. However, shortfalls identified demonstrate that staff are not fully aware of their roles and responsibilities in maintaining the environment. Staff had not acted to remove an obviously damaged toybox lid in the family group room. Also, the rota to ensure that group toys are clean and hygienic is not fully effective.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The centre has a well-established and enthusiastic management team. Managers meet regularly and work together effectively to drive forward service developments. The lead social worker, while having no specific management responsibilities, contributes to decisions about the service.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

During this first 12 months of operation, there has been a high turnover of support staff. This has resulted in some staff working long hours to cover vacancies. Recent recruitment has improved staffing levels. There is now a full team of permanent support staff. An additional social worker recently started working in the centre and the manager plans to recruit a further qualified social worker. This increase in staffing reduces the pressure on the team and means that staff have more time to work directly with families.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Many of the recently recruited staff have experience of working in differing areas of childcare. However, a high proportion of the team is new to the centre. The use of shift leaders, still within their probationary period of employment, is a weakness in care arrangements.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff say that they feel supported. The manager is very focused on staff training and is always looking to improve the training programme.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Involved professionals speak highly of the assessment service provided, including the quality of reports. A placing social worker spoke very positively when reflecting on the progress a parent had made who had recently completed her assessment: ‘She has gained her confidence back and they have empowered her.’

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Since the centre was registered, closed circuit television (CCTV) has been introduced into individual flats and communal areas, as an optional assessment tool. Arrangements are individualised, and families understand the use of this surveillance. A recommendation has been set at this inspection to develop the surveillance policy and the procedures to make relevant links to General Data Protection Regulations Inspection report for residential family centre: Foundations Matlock 5 (GDPR) responsibilities.

p.4

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Family Centre Regulations 2002 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential family centre: Foundations Matlock 6

p.5

Residential family centre details

Registered provider: Progressive Care Limited

p.6

Residential family centre details

Registered provider address: 51 Attercliffe Common, Sheffield S9 2AE

p.6

Residential family centre details

Email address: info@progressivecare.co.uk

p.6

Inspectors:

Mary Timms, social care inspector Davinia Lawton, social care inspector Inspection report for residential family centre: Foundations Matlock 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspectors:

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspectors:

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspectors:

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion