Other · Ofsted report
Anglia Ruskin University
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
27 Jun 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Penelope Fawcus
- Postcode verified
CM1 1SQ
- Name on report verified
Anglia Ruskin University
- URN verified
133803
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They have built successfully on their 10 years’ experience, by developing strong partnerships with 12 NHS trusts in the East of England. p.2
- They have ambitious plans and a strategy to train apprentices for the health sector, which faces a shortage of skilled employees. p.2
- Teaching staff are highly skilled and experienced health practitioners with teaching and research backgrounds. p.2
- Apprentices enjoy their well-planned and challenging off-the-job training sessions. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,283
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 33, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Anglia Ruskin University Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Penelope Fawcus, Ofsted Inspector
p.1
Type of provider: Higher education institution Address: Rivermead Campus Bishop Hall Lane Chelmsford Essex CM1 1SQ Monitoring visit: Anglia Ruskin University, 26-27 June 2019
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
At the time of the monitoring visit, the university had 314 apprentices studying on two standards-based higher-level apprenticeships. Around three quarters of apprentices are on a level 5 assistant practitioner apprenticeship that takes approximately 20 months and is delivered in Cambridge and Chelmsford. The remaining apprentices are on a level 5 nursing associate apprenticeship that is delivered in Peterborough and takes approximately 22 months.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Leaders are proud of their reputation as a university that provides degrees at work to a range of employers and learners. They have built successfully on their 10 years’ experience, by developing strong partnerships with 12 NHS trusts in the East of England. They have ambitious plans and a strategy to train apprentices for the health sector, which faces a shortage of skilled employees.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Managers monitor and track the progress of apprentices diligently to ensure that they remain on the programme and complete their qualifications within the planned period. The arrangements for end-point assessments are thorough. However, managers do not make apprentices or their employers routinely aware of their target grades.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Governors do not have a sufficiently clear view of the performance of the levy- funded apprentices and the quality of their training. Hence, they are unable to provide appropriate scrutiny, support and challenge to hold managers to account for making improvements promptly.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Teaching staff are highly skilled and experienced health practitioners with teaching and research backgrounds. Senior leaders provide a good range of professional Monitoring visit: Anglia Ruskin University, 26-27 June 2019 development activities to improve their skills in providing high-quality learning to apprentices.
p.2
Reasonable progress
Leaders have invested time and resources in developing highly interactive virtual learning and virtual reality resources. These enable apprentices to access self- directed learning at their convenience, including from their mobile phones. They also receive prompt detailed and specific feedback on their written assignments. This enables apprentices to present academic assignments to high standards.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Managers work closely with the employers to provide valuable information, advice and guidance to place apprentices on the appropriate career pathways and raise their aspirations. Managers identify apprentices’ prior learning, qualifications, skills and experience at the start of the learning. However, they do not use this information effectively to set individual targets and measure gains in apprentices’ knowledge.
p.3
Reasonable progress
A few employers are not clear about the requirements of an apprenticeship and are not sufficiently involved in the feedback, monitoring and target setting.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Employers are very supportive of the training programme. They provide extensive additional training relating to the care needs of the patients. This enables apprentices to undertake a range of roles. Working with experienced and qualified work-place mentors, apprentices make good progress in acquiring new knowledge, skills and behaviours.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Apprentices enjoy their well-planned and challenging off-the-job training sessions. They hone their skills, by working in clinical placements outside their usual work place. Tutors and workplace mentors provide individual coaching and guidance to help them complete assignments to high standards. Apprentices appreciate the importance of English and mathematics skills in their job roles and personal lives. Most apprentices have the required entry qualifications in these subjects and they continue to develop their skills, producing handover notes and calculating medications accurately.
p.3
Reasonable progress
Apprentices are highly motivated to learn and improve their prospects. They provide high standards of care that patients appreciate. Apprentices use their improved understanding of physiology to understand the nature of patients’ concerns and communicate these to qualified nursing staff more effectively. Their improved confidence and communication skills make them better equipped to speak to service users’ families, thus relieving pressure on clinical staff. Although apprentices talk enthusiastically about their enhanced skills, they do not always understand how to relate their formal learning to their job roles. Monitoring visit: Anglia Ruskin University, 26-27 June 2019 Tutors and mentors provide sufficient feedback that stimulates apprentices to improve the quality of their work as well as the standards of care that they deliver. Apprentices produce appropriate standards of written work. However, apprentices’
p.3
Reasonable progress
work and progress records contain too few explicit links between theory and apprentices’ development of new work-related skills and behaviours.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Of the small number of apprentices who have completed their end-point assessment all have passed with either a merit or a distinction.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers have closely matched the university values with those in the healthcare sector. Patients’ and apprentices’ safety and safeguarding are fully embedded in the culture, of both the university and the employers.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Apprentices have a sound understanding of safeguarding topics and awareness of topics such as domestic abuse, sexual exploitation, modern day slavery and risks arising from radicalisation and extremism. They feel safe at work and at university. They know how to handle issues and to whom they should report any concerns. All university staff who work directly with apprentices receive the required employment checks and undertake annual safeguarding training.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Teachers reinforce apprentices’ understanding of safeguarding topics through the use of workplace scenarios, such as changes in patient behaviour, and the risks associated with learning disability and mental health. Apprentices handle issues of bullying and harassment confidently in the workplace although they do not routinely inform the university. Monitoring visit: Anglia Ruskin University, 26-27 June 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to
p.4
Reasonable progress
Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable progress
regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to
p.5
Reasonable progress
the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Reasonable progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Reasonable progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion