Schools & FE · Independent school inspection
Brighton & Hove Montessori School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
21 May 2019
- Inspectors verified
Clive Dunn
- Postcode verified
BN1 6FB
- Name on report verified
Brighton and Hove Montessori School
- URN verified
133348
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There is no reliable system in place for the designated safeguarding lead to build a picture of low-level concerns about pupils that, taken together, might lead to safeguarding action being taken. ◼ Concerns that staff raise are not always reliably recorded in a timely manner. p.1
- Although there is evidence that staff are alert to concerns and indicators of abuse, processes for recording and responding to these concerns are insecure. p.1
- However, this has not yet happened. ◼ There are paragraphs in this part that are not met with respect to current pupils. p.2
- Among files not systematically sorted or stored, historic records were found where it was not clear how, or if, safeguarding concerns had been properly followed up. ◼ A safeguarding policy is published on the school’s website. p.1
- Planning for the proposed material change is not sufficiently advanced to demonstrate that all standards relating to the proposal are likely to be met. ◼ The proprietor is not sufficiently familiar with some of the most important guidance associated with running an independent school. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that are relevant to the material change, as set out in the annex of this report. p.5
- Number of pupils on the school roll 45 65 65 p.6
- Number of full-time pupils of compulsory school age 31 65 Number of part-time pupils 14 14 p.6
- Number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities 1 2 p.7
- Of which, number of pupils with an education, health and care plan 1 2 p.7
- Of which, number of pupils paid for by a local authority with an education, health and care plan 1 0 p.7
- Number of full-time equivalent teaching staff 4 6 p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,465
- longer than usual (typical 1813)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 35, typical 49
- Average sentence
- 31 words
- Next steps
- 7
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
School material change inspection report
p.1
Brighton and Hove Montessori School 67 Stanford Avenue, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 6FB
p.1
Main inspection findings
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils Paragraph 7, 32(1), 32(1)(c) ◼ The proprietor, who is also the headteacher and designated safeguarding lead, is insufficiently familiar with important safeguarding guidance, including ‘Keeping children safe in education 2018’. ◼ Not all of the required checks on the suitability of staff have been carried out and recorded on the single central record. ◼ Record-keeping of safeguarding concerns is weak. Although there is evidence that staff are alert to concerns and indicators of abuse, processes for recording and responding to these concerns are insecure. There is no reliable system in place for the designated safeguarding lead to build a picture of low-level concerns about pupils that, taken together, might lead to safeguarding action being taken. ◼ Concerns that staff raise are not always reliably recorded in a timely manner. Sometimes they are recorded, but not on, or subsequently transferred to, the school’s
p.1
Main inspection findings
forms intended for this purpose. This means that important details are sometimes missed. The incident records that do exist are poorly organised and some are not stored securely. Among files not systematically sorted or stored, historic records were found where it was not clear how, or if, safeguarding concerns had been properly followed up. ◼ A safeguarding policy is published on the school’s website. It meets requirements in terms of the range of areas it covers. However, the published safeguarding policy is not implemented effectively. Nor does it reflect closely the school’s current practice, or its own arrangements for safeguarding pupils. ◼ The proprietor has not considered thoroughly enough how to adapt the safeguarding policy, the core of which is based on a model policy from the local authority, to ensure that it fully reflects this school. For example, there are frequent references throughout
p.1
Main inspection findings
the policy to the role that governors will play in safeguarding arrangements. Brighton and Hove Montessori School does not have a governing body. The safeguarding policy’s intended overarching ‘disclaimer’ that the school does not have governors near the beginning of the policy, and the possible alternatives, do not amount to an adequate explanation of how this should work in practice in each instance where the policy suggests governors should have a role. ◼ This paragraph is not met currently and, is therefore unlikely to continue to be met if the material change is implemented. Paragraphs 11, 12, 14 and 16 ◼ No evidence was noted that indicated unmet standards relating to the health and safety, risk-assessment or fire-safety arrangements of the currently operating provision. However, preparations for the proposed expansion are at the earliest stages, and in relation to the above paragraphs, amount predominantly to statements of good intent.
p.1
Main inspection findings
◼ The proposed accommodation on the floors above the existing school is currently appointed as a residential space. At present, there is no full or formal risk assessment of the implications of the change of use. ◼ The fire-safety risk assessment has not been extended to account for up to 20 additional pupils, plus staff, being housed on an upper floor. The proprietor has not fully considered the implications of a significant increase in people at the evacuation point. For example, there are no confirmed plans or arrangement for the likelihood that in the event of an emergency, pupils would need to be moved further away from the building. ◼ As per the current accommodation, the proprietor intends to commission external fire- safety experts to advise on the extended school’s fire-safety arrangements and risk assessment. However, this has not yet happened. ◼ There are paragraphs in this part that are not met with respect to current pupils.
p.2
Main inspection findings
There are others where work is not sufficiently advanced to evidence that standards are likely to continue to be met if the material change is implemented. Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors Paragraphs 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 ◼ The single central record does not meet requirements. Those responsible for making the checks on staff and administering, monitoring or overseeing the single central record do not understand the purpose of, or differences between, all of the required checks. ◼ Not all teaching staff have been subject to a check that they have not been prohibited from teaching. ◼ References have been obtained for staff that have lived or worked abroad. However, no further checks have been made for any relevant events that occurred outside the United Kingdom, contrary to the guidance issued by the Secretary of State and the Home Office. The proprietor was not familiar with guidance for how to carry out these
p.2
Main inspection findings
important safety checks. ◼ The proprietor did not know about statutory checks on whether any leaders have previously been prohibited from taking part in the management of an independent school. She had not used the guidance to consider which staff may require this check, either now, or following any restructuring of leadership roles due to the expansion. There was no space on the single central record to show whether any of these checks have been carried out. ◼ The single central record does not show whether barred-list checks have been made on relevant staff. Although upon reviewing files during the inspection, it became apparent that these checks had been made, it was also clear that those responsible for safer recruitment do not understand the different levels of check and who should and should not have the highest level. ◼ There are paragraphs in this part that are currently unmet and are therefore unlikely
p.2
Main inspection findings
to continue to be met if the material change is implemented. Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools Paragraphs 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29 ◼ The proprietor’s proposal is to extend educational provision to occupy the upper two floors of the existing property. Currently, these floors are furnished for residential purposes. They have not yet been converted or furnished for use as a school. ◼ When ready, the accommodation will provide three additional rooms for teaching and learning, including one large and two smaller spaces. ◼ There are separate toilet and washing facilities for staff and pupils. Currently, there is provision for one further toilet for the additional 20 pupils, which is in line with non- statutory guidance. However, the proprietor has plans to adapt the existing bathroom to provide two individual toilets with integral washing facilities. ◼ There are sufficient supplies of thermostatically controlled hot and cold running water,
p.3
Main inspection findings
and mains drinking water, which are labelled in the currently-used spaces. ◼ The school will continue to make use of existing facilities for the short-term care of sick or injured pupils. ◼ There is sufficient outdoor space on site to accommodate the youngest children. The proprietor intends to continue existing arrangements for the older pupils to access a nearby park for recreational purposes daily and at least weekly for physical education. ◼ Although the accommodation currently has sufficient light and acoustic conditions conducive to effective learning, the proprietor has plans to improve both the lighting and the décor of this part of the premises. The proprietor has identified damp which she reports requires treatment before decoration. Fixed shelving that is on the stairway currently presents a hazard on the only escape route and evacuation routes are not signposted. Consequently, the proprietor is not able to demonstrate at this
p.3
Main inspection findings
stage that the health and safety of pupils would be assured. ◼ Not all the paragraphs in this part are likely to continue to be met if the material change is implemented. Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraph 34 ◼ The proprietor has not ensured that the independent school standards are met consistently. Critical standards in relation to the school’s current operation, including those relating to safeguarding, are unmet. Planning for the proposed material change is not sufficiently advanced to demonstrate that all standards relating to the proposal are likely to be met. ◼ The proprietor is not sufficiently familiar with some of the most important guidance associated with running an independent school. This has led to gaps in vital parts of the school’s work, such as safer recruitment. For example, the proprietor has not ensured that staff responsible for carrying out suitability checks know how to make
p.3
Main inspection findings
prohibition from teaching checks where relevant, including on staff who do not have a registration number. ◼ The weaknesses in safeguarding mean that pupils’ well-being cannot be assured. ◼ The paragraph in this part is currently unmet and is therefore unlikely to continue to be met if the requested material change is implemented.
p.4
Compliance with regulatory requirements
The school does not meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that are relevant to the material change, as set out in the annex of this report.
p.5
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 162(4) of the Education Act 2002, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s likely compliance with the independent school standards relevant to the material change that the school has applied to make.
p.6
School details
Email address info@brighton-montessori.org.uk
p.6
School details
Date of previous standard inspection 5–7 June 2018
p.6
recommendation
Number of pupils on the school roll 45 65 65
p.6
School’s current position School’s proposal
Number of full-time pupils of compulsory school age 31 65 Number of part-time pupils 14 14
p.6
School’s current position School’s proposal
Number of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities 1 2
p.7
School’s current position School’s proposal
Of which, number of pupils with an education, health and care plan 1 2
p.7
School’s current position School’s proposal
Of which, number of pupils paid for by a local authority with an education, health and care plan 1 0
p.7
School’s current position School’s proposal
Number of full-time equivalent teaching staff 4 6
p.7
Information about this school
◼ The school is a Montessori non-selective, mixed day school for pupils aged between two and 12 years of age. The school operates from a large converted Victorian house and gardens. ◼ The headteacher is also the sole proprietor of the school. ◼ The school is currently registered for 45 pupils, and at the time of the inspection was full. ◼ The school was last inspected 5 to 7 June 2018, when the overall effectiveness was judged to be good.
p.7
Information about this inspection
◼ The inspection was commissioned by the Department for Education because the proprietor had applied to make changes to the school’s registration. The proprietor wished to increase the number of pupils on roll. ◼ This was the first material change inspection. ◼ Prior to the visit, the inspector’s preparations included familiarising himself with the context and inspection history of the school. He also reviewed the school’s website and scrutinised some of the available policies. ◼ On site, the inspector held discussions with the headteacher, who is also the proprietor. He also met other staff and pupils informally as he toured the premises with the headteacher. ◼ While touring the site, inside and out, the inspector took account of the current situation of the premises, as well as the plans, intentions and proposed developments. ◼ The inspector checked policies, records and documentation in relation to the specific
p.8
Information about this inspection
independent school standards that were within the scope of this inspection. This included checking the single central record and safeguarding policy. He reviewed safeguarding arrangements and safer recruitment procedures.
p.8
Inspection team
Clive Dunn, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.8
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
◼ 7 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that— – 7(a) arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and – 7(b) such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.
p.9
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
◼ 18(2) The standard in this paragraph is met if— – 18(2)(b) no such person carries out work, or intends to carry out work, at the school in contravention of a prohibition order, an interim prohibition order, or any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act, or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in either such direction; – 18(2)(e) in the case of any person for whom, by reason of that person living or having lived outside the United Kingdom, obtaining such a certificate is not sufficient to establish the person’s suitability to work in a school, such further checks are made as the proprietor considers appropriate, having regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State; and ◼ 18(3) The checks referred to in sub-paragraphs (2)(c) and (except where sub- paragraph (4) applies) (2)(e) must be completed before a person’s appointment.
p.9
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
◼ 21(1) The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor keeps a register which shows such of the information referred to in sub-paragraphs (3) to (7) as is applicable to the school in question. ◼ 21(3) The information referred to in this sub-paragraph is— – 21(3)(a) in relation to each member of staff (“S”) appointed on or after 1st May 2007, whether— – 21(3)(a)(ii) a check was made to establish whether S is barred from regulated activity relating to children in accordance with section 3(2) of the 2006 Act; – 21(3)(a)(iii) a check was made to establish whether S is subject to any direction made under section 128 of the 2008 Act or section 142 of the 2002 Act or any disqualification, prohibition or restriction which takes effect as if contained in such a direction; – 21(3)(a)(viii) checks were made pursuant to paragraph 18(2)(e), – 21(3)(b) in relation to each member of staff (“S”), whether a check was made to
p.9
Part 4. Suitability of staff, supply staff, and proprietors
establish whether S is subject to a prohibition order or an interim prohibition order, including the date on which such check was completed.
p.9
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
◼ 34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school— – 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; – 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and – 34(1)(c) actively promote the well-being of pupils.
p.10
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
◼ 11 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that relevant health and safety laws are complied with by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written health and safety policy. ◼ 12 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures compliance with the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. ◼ 16 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that— – 16(a) the welfare of pupils at the school is safeguarded and promoted by the drawing up and effective implementation of a written risk assessment policy; and – 16(b) appropriate action is taken to reduce risks that are identified.
p.10
Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools
◼ 25 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that the school premises and the accommodation and facilities provided therein are maintained to a standard such that, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of pupils are ensured. guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools
Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visitwww.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Part 5. Premises of and accommodation at schools
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion