Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Minet Junior School

Inspected 3 Jul 2019 · published 24 Jul 2019 · URN 102391

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    3 Jul 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Helen Rai

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    UB3 3NR

  • Name on report verified

    Minet Junior School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+92Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivelywell-designedhigh-qualitycleargood progressimprovedstrengthspositive
Criticismnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings960w+91
  • What needs to improve104w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,046
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms Kellie Ryan Headteacher Minet Junior School Avondale Drive Hayes UB3 3NR

p.1

Short inspection of Minet Junior School

Following my visit to the school on 3 July 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in September 2015.

p.1

Short inspection of Minet Junior School

You have worked closely with senior leaders, the local authority and governors to make sure that a good standard of education has been maintained. You know the school well and have identified the main areas for development.

p.1

Short inspection of Minet Junior School

Significant work has been done to develop leadership, through training and partnership work, to good effect. This training programme has helped middle leaders to support, train and challenge teachers with more confidence. Leaders at all levels are provided with opportunities to review the impact of their work, using a range of monitoring techniques, and present this information to governors. This has improved the leadership and developed a shared understanding of expectations.

p.1

Short inspection of Minet Junior School

Leaders have placed importance on developing techniques to support pupils’ well-being and mental health. A range of well-designed strategies have led to higher levels of pupil engagement and extended opportunities to work with families.

p.1

Short inspection of Minet Junior School

Governors recognise the recent improvements made in the school and collect a range of evidence to validate the judgements of school leaders. They demonstrate a commitment to partnership with school staff and work in collaboration to support improvement. Their visits to school are regular and well targeted. As a result, they are well informed about the strengths and areas for development.

p.1

Short inspection of Minet Junior School

Parents and carers are generally positive about the school. The responses from the survey evidences that they welcome many of the new improvements following a period of some instability in leadership.

p.1

Short inspection of Minet Junior School

Pupils talk positively about their school. They recognise the importance of the values promoted in school for guidance on how to conduct themselves. They engage well in learning and respond positively to the praise and acknowledgements given by staff.

p.2

Short inspection of Minet Junior School

Leaders have implemented a culture of safeguarding that protects all members of the school community with robust policies and procedures. Leaders understand the importance of keeping all pupils safe, and make sure that pupils and staff receive timely guidance and advice. Governors understand the importance of reliable safeguarding procedures and regularly review practice to ensure that the pupils and staff are safe in school.

p.2

Short inspection of Minet Junior School

Pupils report that they feel safe in school, are supervised well and know who to go to if they have a problem. Staff demonstrate a secure understanding of safeguarding issues and procedures in place to protect the community as a result of regular training.

p.2

Inspection findings

 We agreed at the start of the inspection that the first key line of enquiry should be to review the steps leaders have taken to raise attainment in reading. This was linked to a recommendation from the previous inspection report. Leaders have reviewed the systems for teaching reading and have trained staff well. As a result, there is consistency in the approach across classes.  Staff have concentrated on using high-quality books to develop pupils’ language skills. This has increased confidence in pupils in learning and understanding new vocabulary.  Pupils have opportunities to read in a variety of subjects across the curriculum. For example, in a Year 6 mathematics lesson, pupils were encouraged to read background information about the French mathematician, Blaise Pascal, before working on the mathematical patterns of his triangle.  Teachers use a range of techniques to engage pupils in stories. In a Year 4

p.2

Inspection findings

lesson, when pupils were acting out a chapter from the selected key text, they demonstrated knowledge of a range of vocabulary and were able to summarise the identified chapter .  Resources to support learning are appropriately selected, including for pupils who need additional support. In a Year 4 lesson, pupils were working with a teaching assistant to describe a beaver using a picture. There was a clear focus on building vocabulary and understanding about beavers linked to a character from the core text ‘The lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe’, by C.S Lewis.  It is clear from pupils’ books that they are taught to use a range of reading techniques. It was less clear, however, that teachers consistently promote the use of these techniques in lessons. Systems for promoting independent reading, when pupils can apply these key skills, need to be more embedded.  I investigated what action leaders have taken to improve the quality of work in

p.2

Inspection findings

topic books. This line of enquiry was a recommendation from the previous inspection report. The work in pupils’ books shows typically good progress and the focus on the presentation of pupils’ work has led to improvement. Leaders have focused on developing connections between subjects within the curriculum to make meaningful links. This needs to be securely embedded across the school to ensure consistency.  Teachers make effective use of questioning to challenge pupils’ understanding of topics across the curriculum. In the best practice, teachers used extension questions to deepen pupils’ understanding. The use of key questions in topic work, such as ‘How have the actions of the Anglo-Saxons impacted on the history of Britain?’ is skilfully planned and enable pupils to draw together different aspects of their learning.  A range of opportunities to share ideas through collaborative activities and discussion are used well. Pupils welcome opportunities to work together and are

p.3

Inspection findings

happy to share their learning with their peers.  Pupils use their skills in extended writing across subjects. Pupils are aware of expectations and take pride in their work. The clear guidance on expectations enables them to reflect on their own learning and make improvements.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 further steps are taken to ensure that opportunities to teach specific reading skills are fully embedded alongside monitoring of pupils’ application of these skills in their independent reading  the work on developing the curriculum is fully embedded into planning to ensure that the opportunities for extending their knowledge are routinely used.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the borough of Hillingdon, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hillingdon. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During this inspection, I held meetings with you and other members of the senior leadership team. I met with governors and a representative from the local authority. I had informal conversations with some parents when they were dropping their children at school at the start of the day. I also reviewed feedback on Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey. I appraised the safeguarding procedures with the designated safeguarding lead and the administrator who deals with recruitment processes. I met with middle leaders and reviewed pupils’ work. Senior leaders accompanied me on visits to classrooms. I talked to pupils about their learning. I reviewed feedback from the staff survey. I also evaluated school documents such as the school improvement plan.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion