Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Acorn Homes (UK) Ltd in Kent

Inspected 6 Jun 2019 · published 20 Jul 2019 · URN 1250521

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    Acorn Homes (UK) Ltd

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Jun 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Jackson

  • Helped and protected verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    1250521

  • URN verified

    1250521

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedRI to be good
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−9Mixedmore positive than 9% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectivelypositivelystrongeffectiveimprovedwarmrespectful
Criticismharmat riskconcernslackweaknessesrequires improvementinsufficientunclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1133w+10
  • What needs to improve497w−79

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,603
about usual (typical 1319)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 51
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 4
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%What needs to improve 24%About the inspection 21%

Full report text

Inspection report children’s home: 1250521 1 Registered provider: Acorn Homes (UK) Ltd

p.1

Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This home, part of a group, offers care for up to four children who have been identified as likely to benefit from residential care.

p.1

Information about this children’s home

The manager has been registered with Ofsted since November 2018.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The children’s home provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of last inspection: 18 October 2018

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: improved effectiveness

p.1

good

Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report children’s home: 1250521 2

p.1

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

18/10/2018 Interim Improved effectiveness 23/05/2018 Full Requires improvement to be good 15/08/2017 Full Requires improvement to be good Inspection report children’s home: 1250521 3

p.2

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.3

Requirement Due date

The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.

p.3

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard requires the registered person to ensure that staff— assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child. (Regulation 12 (1)(2)(a)(i))

p.3

Requirement Due date

Specifically, ensure that thorough risk assessment and risk management practice is evident when a new child accesses the service. 30/09/2019

p.3

Requirement Due date

The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in relation to the children’s home that— helps children to fulfil their potential; and promotes their welfare.

p.3

Requirement Due date

In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered person to— ensure that staff have the experience, qualifications and skills to meet the needs of each child. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b)(2)(c))

p.3

Requirement Due date

Specifically, all staff, including temporary staff, should be given the information and resources they need to work safely with children in the home. 30/11/2019

p.3

Recommendations

 Staff should continually and actively assess the risks to each child and the arrangements in place to protect them. Where there are safeguarding concerns for a child, their placement plan, agreed between the home and their placing Inspection report children’s home: 1250521 4 authority, must include details of the steps the home will take to manage any assessed risks on a day to day basis. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 42, paragraph 9.5)  Any child who has been restrained should be given the opportunity to express their feelings about their experience of the restraint as soon as is practicable, ideally within 24 hours of the restraint incident, taking the age of the child and the circumstances of the restraint into account. In some cases, children may need longer to work through their feelings, so a record that the child has talked about their feelings should be made no longer than 5 days after the incident of restraint

p.3

Recommendations

(regulation 35(3)(c)). Children should be encouraged to add their views and comments to the record of restraint. Children should be offered the opportunity to access an advocacy support to help them with this (regulation 7(2)(b)(iii)). (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 50, paragraph 9.60)  Supervision of staff practice should ensure that individual adults in the home are engaged in the safeguarding culture of the home, so they understand what they would need to do if they found other staff misusing or abusing their position to the detriment of the safety of a child. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 43, paragraph 9.14)

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The registered manager and staff continue to build on the progress seen at the last interim inspection. A child said that the home is a ‘calm space’. Staff and children share warm and respectful relationships.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The standard of decor in the home is very good. The external spaces, which had been highlighted as areas for improvement, are now well maintained.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Generally, children are making progress against the targets defined in their placement plans. A social worker spoke about the ‘amazing work’ that the home had done to stabilise a child after a string of placement breakdowns. He has seen, as a result, positive changes in the child’s attitude and approach to other professionals in her support network. Staff promote the importance of engagement in education. The registered manager advocates effectively for children when they are struggling to form and maintain stable placements at school. Children who are finishing school this summer are being encouraged and supported to find employment in the local area.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The registered manager recognises that improvements are required in the recording of children’s progress. Work is underway to provide a clearer picture of how children are working towards meeting targets. Key-working systems employ a traffic-light system to track progress against goals. However, staff are not making use of this. Staff complete a regular monthly report for each child which makes some reference to progress against Inspection report children’s home: 1250521 5 identified areas of need.

p.4

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Children spoke positively about activities that they engage in. They are offered plentiful opportunities to engage in the wider community. The children said that the remoteness of the home can make it difficult to engage in more spontaneous activities. Staff regularly consult with children about things they would like to do. They aim to tie activities into the development goals for children. Photographic records are kept, helping promote positive memories for the children.

p.5

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff are thinking carefully about the future for the older children in the home. They want to ensure that when a child leaves the home this is well managed and provides the best possibility of a positive outcome.

p.5

improvement to be good

Most staff have an awareness of the risks faced by children in the home. Key workers show good insight into the background of the children and how this can influence their risk management plans. However, strategies around tackling child sexual exploitation lacked clear practical steps for staff to assist them in managing risky behaviours effectively. Some staff were not confident in how to respond to certain situations. For example, if children leave the site without authorisation some staff were unclear on the steps to follow.

p.5

improvement to be good

The registered manager is using temporary agency staff in full-time roles. It is not clear how well they are trained and inducted to work with children in this home.

p.5

improvement to be good

Incidents are clearly recorded. Staff complete debriefs with children after incidents, but they lack depth. Children should always be given an opportunity to explore their views and feelings. This may, in some cases, require time between the incident and discussions to be meaningful. Staff follow up incidents well with clear evidence of notifications to all relevant parties, including social workers and Ofsted. Staff learning from the outcomes of incidents is also reflected in risk management plans.

p.5

improvement to be good

Admissions procedures demonstrated insufficient risk assessment and management for children new to the home. For one child, staff were not given enough information to ensure her safety during her first few days at the home. This placed the child at risk of harm.

p.5

improvement to be good

Staff focus on positive behaviours. They use praise and reward to encourage children to engage positively with each other and the staff team. This is reflected in the minimal use of physical intervention and sanctions. When these are employed, it is always proportionate to the situation.

p.5

improvement to be good

Some staff lacked confidence in how to follow whistleblowing procedures. They were particularly uncertain about where to seek external support with safeguarding issues. Inspection report children’s home: 1250521 6

p.5

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The registered manager continues to build on positive progress at the home. Staff complimented him on his availability and openness to give support and guidance when required.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The staff team is still relatively new and inexperienced and there have been some significant changes in personnel. Staff and children both referred to this and had found it challenging. They all share the feeling that the home is now in a more consistent and settled period. The registered manager is aware of the impact that lack of experienced staff can have on the quality of care and support. He is currently recruiting a senior team leader to offer staff additional support and guidance.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Recruitment systems follow guidelines. However, some concerns emerged about gaps in the induction of temporary staff working in the home. The registered manager and responsible individual already have plans in place to address this and their proposed new induction programme shows promise.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff were positive about the quality of supervision. The registered manager is generally meeting his own targets for delivery. However, there were some staff who had not kept up their supervision schedules and the registered manager is working closely with them to address this.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Internal monitoring systems for the home identify key strengths and weaknesses. The registered manager is very open and honest about where he sees the home requiring development. The home has a new responsible individual who is in the process of completing a thorough service-level audit. She hopes to complete this and provide an action plan for improvement to the registered manager shortly.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The registered manager was able to demonstrate strong advocacy for children in education and transitions. He shows great passion and commitment to his role. He demands the best for the children he cares for.

p.6

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Children have many opportunities to have a say in their lives at the home. The registered manager and responsible individual have introduced initiatives such as a ‘you said we did’ meeting to help children recognise that their input makes a difference. During this visit, children were very engaged and animated as they discussed their views on the house summer holiday with the responsible individual. Inspection report children’s home: 1250521 7

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.7

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: 1250521 8

p.7

Children’s home details

Registered provider: Acorn Homes (UK) Ltd

p.8

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: 424 Margate Road, Ramsgate CT12 6SJ

p.8

Inspector

Peter Jackson, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: 1250521 9 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspector

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspector

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspector

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion