Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
28 Jun 2019
- Inspectors verified
Jane Franks
- Postcode verified
RG10 0PX
- Name on report verified
Foxley Nursery School
- URN verified
EY224734
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- For example, they have failed to notified Ofsted of significant events, such as serious accidents involving children. p.4
- Staff are alert to possible signs that children may be at risk of harm. p.4
- The progress some children make is not good enough, particularly children with identified additional needs or delays in their learning. p.5
- Although self-evaluation is not effective in supporting consistently good p.4
- Partnerships with parents are not always successful. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The inspector took into account the views of parents spoken to on the day. p.2
- The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the impact on children's learning. p.2
- The inspector conducted a joint observation with the provider. p.2
- The inspector held discussions with the providers, children and staff at appropriate times during the inspection. p.2
- The inspector looked at various documents, including policies and procedures, risk assessments, staff training records, records for children and evidence of the suitability of staff. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families8
“Partnerships with parents are not always successful.” p.4Teaching & assessment7
“The quality of teaching is too inconsistent.” p.1Leadership & governance7
“Leaders have failed to meet all the legal requirements of their role.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,179
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Foxley Nursery School Manor Drive, Shurlock Row, Reading, Berkshire RG10 0PX
p.1
Inspection date 28 June 2019 Previous inspection date 4 October 2017
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Good 2 Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4 Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4 Outcomes for children Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
n The key-person system is not effective. Leaders do not share all information on children's welfare and development needs swiftly enough, to ensure key persons plan effectively and tailor support to close gaps in learning quickly. This has a significant impact on the progress children make, in particular those children who require additional support. n The quality of teaching is too inconsistent. Not all staff extend children's thinking or motivate and challenge them as they play. They do not share information on children's development needs, to ensure consistency in their learning. For example, staff supervise children indoors while their key children engage in play outside for long periods of the day. n Supervision procedures and monitoring of staff practice are ineffective. Leaders do not monitor and support all staff effectively, to raise the quality of practice and teaching to a good level. n Although staff have established working relationships with parents, there are
p.1
This provision is inadequate
inconsistencies in information sharing, such as seeking details on other settings children also attend, and keeping parents involved in and informed about children's development. n On occasions, staff are less effective in helping children understand how to keep themselves safe. n Staff do not make the most of opportunities to ensure children can recognise and use the languages they hear at home, to support their learning further. n The systems for self-evaluation are not sufficiently robust to ensure improvement is consistently sustained.
p.1
It has the following strengths
n Staff encourage children to share, take turns and use good manners. n Children enjoy healthy snacks. They practise their physical skills outside and gain confidence using climbing equipment.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date improve the key-person system to ensure all staff have an accurate awareness of children's care and development needs, plan highly effectively and consistently provide children with the right level of support and challenge, to close gaps in learning swiftly 22/07/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure effective arrangements are in place for the monitoring and supervision of staff to identify and act on weaknesses in practice, to improve the quality of teaching and learning 22/07/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
develop further strategies to ensure there is a consistent and meaningful two-way flow of information sharing with all parents about their child's learning and development 22/07/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
develop effective strategies to make sure staff gather information from parents on other settings their children also attend, to ensure consistency in children's learning 22/07/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure Ofsted are notified of significant events as required. 22/07/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n extend the opportunities available for children to see and use their home languages, to support their learning further n use all opportunities to build on children's understanding of how to keep themselves safe n make more effective use of self-evaluation to address areas of weakness swiftly and with more accuracy, to improve outcomes for children.
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
Inspection activities n The inspector took into account the views of parents spoken to on the day. n The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the impact on children's learning. n The inspector conducted a joint observation with the provider. n The inspector held discussions with the providers, children and staff at appropriate times during the inspection. n The inspector looked at various documents, including policies and procedures, risk assessments, staff training records, records for children and evidence of the suitability of staff.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
Leaders have failed to meet all the legal requirements of their role. For example, they have failed to notified Ofsted of significant events, such as serious accidents involving children. Leaders do not identify weaknesses in staff practice quickly and accurately, to offer feedback and specific training and mentoring. This means that the quality of teaching and children's progress are not developing swiftly enough. Leaders ensure that adult-to-child ratios are met and that there are sufficient staff to supervise children indoors and outdoors, including when managing the personal care needs of children. They review any complaints made and address all concerns raised. Safeguarding is effective. Staff are alert to possible signs that children may be at risk of harm. They know what to do if they have concerns about the welfare of a child or the behaviour of a colleague. Although self-evaluation is not effective in supporting consistently good
p.4
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
outcomes, leaders have made some positive changes to the nursery. For example, staff have enhanced learning experiences outdoors, to help build on the early writing skills of boys.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The key-person system does not effectively support children with their learning. Although assessments of children's learning are routinely taking place, leaders do not effectively share all information gained, for example from parents with staff, to ensure staff have a clear understanding of children's development needs. As a result, where there are identified delays in children's learning, targeted support for them is not implemented at the earliest opportunity. This means they do not catch up with their peers at a quick enough rate. Staff engage in discussion with children overall. However, they do not extend and build on children's learning as they play. For example, staff repeatedly ask children which car they think will go the fastest and do not follow this through to extend learning further. That said, children enjoy exploring the properties of ice. They are developing their awareness of how to use tools for a variety of purposes.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
Children use their imagination well and develop their own ways of doing things, such as building obstacle courses in the garden.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The weaknesses in the key-person system have a significant impact on children's well- being. For example, staff do not share information with each other effectively about important changes that affect children's daily lives. As a result, children do not always get the support they need while they are attending. At times during the day, the inspector observed some children wandering around the nursery with very little encouragement from staff to engage them in activities of interest. Partnerships with parents are not always successful. For example, not all staff share clear and meaningful information on children's progress. Staff do not successfully gather details on other settings children also attend or engage all parents and encourage them to share information on their child's abilities at home. This impacts on children's care and learning. Staff encourage children to adopt good hygiene routines, such as washing their
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
hands. However, they do not always encourage children to think about their own personal safety, for example to wear sun hats in hot weather. Staff encourage children to value the cultural traditions of their peers. However, they do fully support children to use their home languages in their play, to extend their learning further.
p.4
Outcomes for children are inadequate
The progress some children make is not good enough, particularly children with identified additional needs or delays in their learning. Nonetheless, all children acquire some of the basic skills they will need for their future learning. Children are curious about the world. Older children learn to write their name and all children enjoy painting activities. They develop positive friendships with each other and behave well.
p.5
Setting details
Unique reference number EY224734 Local authority Windsor and Maidenhead Inspection number 10113854 Type of provision Childcare on non-domestic premises
p.6
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Full day care Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 36 Number of children on roll 69
p.6
Name of registered person
Mr Russell Trayling & Mrs Sharon Trayling Partnership
p.6
reference number
Date of previous inspection 4 October 2017 Telephone number 01189343578
p.6
reference number
Foxley Nursery School registered with its current owners in 2002. It is situated in Shurlock Row, in the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. The nursery is open Monday to Friday between 8.45am and 3.45pm, during term time only. There are five qualified members of staff and one apprentice working with the children. The nursery is in receipt of funding for the provision of free early education for children aged two, three and four years.
p.6
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.6
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.7
reference number
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.7
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.7
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion