Schools & FE · Short school inspection
St White's Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
19 Jun 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Tom Morrison
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
GL14 3GD
- Name on report verified
St White’s Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance12
“They are knowledgeable and hold leaders to account effectively.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 963
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 55, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Clare Tilling Headteacher St White’s Primary School Sneyd Wood Road Cinderford Gloucestershire GL14 3GD
p.1
Short inspection of St White’s Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 19 June 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in November 2015.
p.1
Short inspection of St White’s Primary School
You and your leadership team have maintained the good quality of education at the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Short inspection of St White’s Primary School
You took over as headteacher earlier this year. Together with the governors you are establishing your leadership team while continuing to improve the work of the school. Since the previous inspection, leaders have worked on the areas for improvement. This work has been very effective. Attendance has improved so that last year it was above the national average. Pupils’ writing has also improved and has been above the national average for the past three years.
p.1
Short inspection of St White’s Primary School
Governors have the highest aspirations for the success of the pupils. They have taken strong strategic decisions. They are knowledgeable and hold leaders to account effectively.
p.1
Short inspection of St White’s Primary School
Pupils enjoy school, are well behaved, confident and increasingly articulate. They value the teaching that they receive. They enjoy the wide range of activities, trips and other opportunities that are provided for them. Parents agree, commenting, for example, ‘The school is good at providing opportunities for the children which prepare them for the real world, broaden their horizons and develop life skills.’ Parents are positive about their children’s progress. They are pleased with how the school has helped their children to grow in confidence. They recognise the value of the emotional and other support the school provides. Teachers and other staff enjoy working at St White’s and are very positive about their professional development.
p.1
Safeguarding is effective
It is clear that all members of staff, leaders and governors take the safeguarding of children very seriously. They work hard to make sure that pupils are safe. Safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Records are detailed and of high quality. The arrangements for checking the suitability of staff to work with children meet requirements.
p.2
Safeguarding is effective
Staff are well trained in safeguarding, on induction to the school and through regular updates. As a result, they are confident to raise any concerns they may have. Concerns are followed up rigorously. Leaders are vigilant and ensure that they work effectively with other agencies, including the police, to address the concerns.
p.2
Safeguarding is effective
Pupils are taught how to be safe, both in school and in the community through lessons, trips and assemblies. Pupils know who to go to if they are worried. They are confident that any worries, including about bullying, poor or discriminating behaviour, will be dealt with quickly. As a result of the good work of staff, children feel safe, and their parents agree that the school helps to keep their children safe.
p.2
Inspection findings
The first line of enquiry was about how effectively leaders and governors are supporting learning for disadvantaged pupils. Leaders put these children at the centre of everything that they do and have the highest aspiration for their success. They carefully analyse the needs, strengths and weaknesses of disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities. They use this information to design the curriculum and provide support for these pupils. Leaders and governors have taken appropriate budgetary decisions to support this, such as appointing extra support staff. Teachers are held to account for the progress that all pupils make, with a particular focus on disadvantaged pupils. As a result of this, and the relentless focus on improving teaching and learning, these pupils make good progress. Second, we looked at the work that you are doing to ensure that pupils reach the
p.2
Inspection findings
highest possible standards. Over the past few years, the proportion of pupils achieving the expected standard has improved so that it is above the national figure. However, the proportion of pupils achieving the higher standards is not good enough. You have made this a priority for school development. Leaders have made changes to the way that mathematics is taught. Pupils have more opportunities to apply their mathematical reasoning to solve problems. This is starting to be effective and more pupils are now achieving highly. You have also introduced changes to the way that pupils develop their writing skills. We observed this working well in lessons and in the quality of writing in pupils’ books. However, this approach has only recently been adopted. It has not yet resulted in sustained improvement. You are committed to further work. Finally, we explored the work that teachers are doing to improve pupils’ spelling
p.2
Inspection findings
and vocabulary. Although spelling has improved over the past few years, you have identified that some pupils lack confidence in spelling. This holds back their overall performance in writing. You have also identified that pupils do not have the wide and extensive vocabulary that would enable them to read more complex books. As a result, you have introduced a systematic approach that uses more oral discussion of new words. You use games and expect pupils to learn more spellings each week. Teachers are carrying out this new approach effectively. You are carefully tracking the impact. You have found that pupils are achieving more success in their spelling and have a wider vocabulary as a result. However, you also recognise that this approach will take time.
p.2
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should:
p.3
Next steps for the school
embed and enhance recent approaches to enable all children to reach the highest standards they are capable of, especially in writing.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Gloucestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, I met with parents, pupils, staff and governors. Together with senior leaders, we observed learning across the school and looked at pupils’ work to see the changes that had been made to teaching and learning. I examined a variety of documents, including your evaluation of the performance of the school, development plans, assessment information and the school’s website. I also examined records of the checks that leaders make on the suitability of staff to work with children. I took account of the views of the parents in the 26 responses to the Ofsted online survey and from meeting some parents before school. I met a group of staff and of pupils to listen to their views.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion