Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Ormskirk School
Summary
Erica Sharman (lead), Annette Patterson, Dawn Farrent, Ruth Bradbury, Shane Ierston
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
22 May 2019
- Inspectors verified
Annette Patterson, Dawn Farrent, Erica Sharman, Ruth Bradbury, Shane Ierston
- 16 to 19 study programmes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
L39 2AT
- Name on report verified
Ormskirk School
- URN verified
132834
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- 16 to 19 study programmesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- When teachers’ expectations are too low, activities fail to capture pupils’ interest. p.1
- However, despite having asked these questions, governors were not effective in holding the headteacher and other senior leaders to account for the lack of improvement since the last inspection. p.4
- Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate p.1
- When teaching is not effective, teachers do not plan for learning that meets pupils’ needs and eliminate gaps in pupils’ knowledge, including in the sixth form. p.1
- do not have consistently high expectations of pupils’ work. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve teaching and learning in the sixth form so that students make stronger progress on academic courses. p.2
- An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- Teaching has been the main whole-school focus for improvement since the last inspection. p.4
- Despite this, the lack of appropriate lines of accountability left middle leaders and teachers confused about their responsibilities and unsure of senior leaders’ expectations for new teaching strategies. p.4
- As a result, there has been little improvement in teaching across the school. p.4
- The variability that was seen at the last inspection continues. p.4
- Leaders have used quality assurance systems to monitor teaching and learning across the curriculum. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Personal development15
“Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 13
- Words of findings
- 3,818
- about usual (typical 3317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 46
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ormskirk School Wigan Road, Ormskirk, Lancashire L39 2AT
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Since the last inspection, leaders and governors have been too slow to bring about improvement. Over this period, leaders and teachers have not been held to account effectively for the progress and welfare of the pupils in their care. Disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not make the progress that they should. Teaching is not consistently good. Pupils do not have enough time to reflect on their work and make improvements. Teachers do not consistently support pupils to develop accuracy and fluency in their writing. When teaching is not effective, teachers do not plan for learning that meets pupils’ needs and eliminate gaps in pupils’ knowledge, including in the sixth form. Pupils’ work is sometimes of poor quality; it is untidy, often unfinished and sometimes tasks are missing, particularly for boys. Occasionally, bullying is not dealt with
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
effectively by staff. Teachers have not used school policies effectively. As a result, pupils’ behaviour has declined since the previous inspection. A minority of pupils behave inappropriately in social areas and corridors. When teachers’ expectations are too low, activities fail to capture pupils’ interest. Pupils stop working and disrupt learning. This is not challenged consistently by teachers. The proportion of pupils who have been excluded for a fixed period is higher than the national average, particularly for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND. The proportion of pupils who are regularly absent from school is high, particularly for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND. Over time, in the sixth form, leaders’ actions have not had enough impact on improving teaching and outcomes for academic courses.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The recent appointment of a new headteacher has already started to have a positive impact on pupils’ attitudes and behaviour. Safeguarding is effective. Careers information and guidance are effective in supporting pupils for their next stage. The curriculum includes a broad range of subjects.
p.1
Full report
In accordance with section 44(2) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably be expected to perform.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve leadership, including governance, by ensuring that leaders: – speed up and embed the very recent improvements to the school so that its long- standing weaker aspects are quickly and fully addressed – use effective accountability structures so that leaders and teachers are held to account for the progress and welfare of pupils in their care – use pupil premium funding effectively to improve the progress of disadvantaged pupils. Improve pupils’ progress, particularly for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND, by ensuring that teachers: – cater effectively for pupils’ individual needs, so that all groups of pupils make strong progress – have consistently high expectations of pupils – systematically develop the technical accuracy and fluency of pupils’ writing – challenge pupils to produce written work that is complete and of the highest possible standard. Improve pupils’ behaviour, by ensuring that:
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
– teachers follow the expectations in the behaviour policy to challenge pupils whose behaviour is not of a high standard – effective strategies are put in place to reduce the proportion of pupils regularly absent from school, particularly for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND – appropriate support is provided for pupils who cannot self-regulate their behaviour, so that the proportion of pupils excluded from school for a fixed period reduces – incidents of bullying are dealt with promptly and effectively. Improve teaching and learning in the sixth form so that students make stronger progress on academic courses.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
Since the last inspection, leaders and governors have not been effective in bringing about improvement. The weaknesses in the school’s work identified in the previous inspection have not been properly addressed. In addition, the school’s approaches have led to pupils’ behaviour declining. The lack of effective leadership since the previous inspection does not give full assurance that the very recent improvements to the school will be sustained and embedded. There has been turbulence in leadership and management in the last few years. Shortly before the last inspection, the headteacher of many years retired. The new headteacher stayed in post for only a little over two years and temporary leadership was put in place until the current headteacher was appointed at Easter 2019. The improvement plan that leaders produced at the time of the last inspection showed promise but failed to bring about improvement. Lack of strong leadership, together
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
with a lack of clear lines of accountability, left middle leaders and teachers floundering and unsure of the leaders’ expectations. The inconsistencies seen in leadership at the last inspection were not addressed effectively. Progress towards improvement stalled. The current headteacher has been in post since Easter 2019 and, after only 20 days, is already having a positive impact on the school. Leaders are already starting to come to grips with some of the areas that need strengthening. Attendance and punctuality are showing signs of improvement, although these are fragile. Pupils now wear their uniform with pride and told inspectors that there are more teachers on duty so that pupils are better behaved. Teachers, pupils, and parents and carers have all been very positive about the changes in the school. However, it is too soon to see any sustained improvement. The school curriculum is broad and balanced. Pupils benefit from a wide range of
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
subjects to choose from in key stage 4. Pupils receive individual, high-quality advice and support to help them to choose appropriate subjects to prepare them for the next stage of their education. The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) has a good understanding of the particular needs of pupils with SEND. Despite this, teachers do not always provide appropriate support to help pupils with SEND overcome their barriers to learning. Consequently, progress for pupils with SEND has not improved since the last inspection. Further, when compared with other pupils, larger proportions of pupils with SEND are regularly absent from school and excluded for a fixed period. Literacy is not developed consistently across the curriculum. Pupils’ work demonstrates that they can write with fluency and accuracy. However, their literacy skills demonstrated in some subjects are not transferred across the curriculum as teachers
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
do not have consistently high expectations of pupils’ work. Pupils’ personal development is supported in weekly ‘skills for life’ sessions. These sessions cover all aspects of British values to prepare pupils for life in modern Britain. These sessions also form a central part of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural (SMSC) development. Leaders enrich pupils’ learning experience through a range of extra-curricular trips and activities. However, despite the quality of the planned curriculum in this area, there are pupils that do not make the link between British values and their behaviour in school. Leaders have not used pupil premium funding effectively to bring about improvement for disadvantaged pupils. Progress for disadvantaged pupils has not improved since the last inspection. Attendance rates for disadvantaged pupils have steadily declined since the last inspection and the incidence of exclusion of these pupils has increased.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors have not ensured that the school has improved sufficiently since the previous inspection. They were not able to secure the actions needed for the school to resolve the weaknesses found at the previous inspection. Governors bring a range of skills to their role. They are knowledgeable, particularly about education. Governors have used this knowledge to ask challenging questions of leaders. However, despite having asked these questions, governors were not effective in holding the headteacher and other senior leaders to account for the lack of improvement since the last inspection. Governors have also not ensured that additional funding available to support disadvantaged pupils has brought about improvements in their progress, behaviour and attendance.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. All appropriate checks are made to ensure that only those that are safe to work with pupils are employed by the school. Leaders have made links with a number of external agencies to ensure that, when needed, appropriate support for pupils and their families is put in place promptly. All staff receive training about safeguarding annually, and updates are provided throughout the year, as necessary. Consequently, staff recognise the signs of abuse and respond appropriately. Pupils told inspectors that they know how to keep themselves safe online and that there is somebody that they can talk to if they need help. Pupils said that they feel safe in school. Leaders work cooperatively with alternative providers to ensure that all safeguarding checks are in place and that pupils attend regularly. Attendance is closely monitored, and absence followed up promptly in line with the school’s policy. Frequent visits by
p.4
Safeguarding
leaders to alternative providers support pupils’ safety.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teaching has been the main whole-school focus for improvement since the last inspection. Despite this, the lack of appropriate lines of accountability left middle leaders and teachers confused about their responsibilities and unsure of senior leaders’ expectations for new teaching strategies. As a result, there has been little improvement in teaching across the school. The variability that was seen at the last inspection continues. Leaders have used quality assurance systems to monitor teaching and learning across the curriculum. As a result, leaders understand the strengths and weaknesses in teaching. However, this understanding has not led to improvements in the consistency of teaching across the school. Whole-school training has also been delivered to help teachers to improve their challenge to pupils and how pupils engage with their learning. There are signs that this is beginning to have some impact at key stage 3. However, this has not led to any
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
significant improvement to the overall consistency of teaching and learning in the school. There are some strengths in teaching. For example, English, modern foreign languages and many of the vocational subjects are strong. In these subjects, teachers model new learning and use questioning effectively to help pupils to deepen their understanding. Pupils are interested in their learning and are keen to improve their work. When teaching is effective, teachers have high expectations. Pupils, including the most able pupils, make strong gains in their learning. However, sometimes teachers do not provide pupils with appropriate challenge. Teachers do not use questioning effectively to tease out pupils’ understanding. Some teachers do not plan learning to address gaps in pupils’ knowledge. When this is the case, teaching revolves around completing tasks rather than developing learning. Consequently, learning is superficial, and some pupils do not perform as well as they
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
should. Not all teachers engage pupils in their learning. Pupils move off task and low-level disruption often occurs as a result. This poor behaviour inhibits learning for the pupils involved and for other pupils in the classroom. Teachers do not consistently develop pupils’ literacy skills across the curriculum. Pupils are not supported effectively to develop their technical skills, and their writing lacks fluency. Weaknesses in this area have an impact across the curriculum, particularly in geography and history. The school’s feedback policy is not applied consistently across departments. When teachers do follow the policy, pupils typically improve their work in response to constructive advice. However, where this does not happen, gaps in pupils’ learning are not addressed and this inhibits future learning.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement. Pupils, parents and staff say that bullying happens in school, but teachers usually deal with it quickly and effectively. Pupils said that there is always somebody to talk to if they have a problem and that they feel safe in school. However, some pupils feel that bullying is not always dealt with effectively and that it carries on despite the intervention of teachers. When this is the case, pupils sometimes stop reporting it to teachers; they say that they just ‘get used to it’. Pupils’ personal development is promoted through ‘skills for life’ sessions, which are delivered to the whole school in a weekly session. This part of the curriculum has been carefully developed to cover all aspects of pupils’ personal, social and health (PSH) education. Despite the quality of the planned curriculum, the inconsistencies in teaching lead to
p.5
Personal development and welfare
varied experiences for pupils during these weekly sessions. Where teaching is not as strong, pupils’ behaviour deteriorates, and they do not engage appropriately in the discussions that take place. As a result, pupils do not benefit fully from the planned curriculum. The curriculum provides pupils with advice on how to manage personal risk and helps pupils to understand how to be respectful and considerate of others. Pupils are very clear on the dangers of online social media sites and how to ensure they stay safe when using them. British values are also promoted through the ‘skills for life’ sessions. Pupils learn about democracy and the rule of law. They see this in action through the workings of the school council. Pupils can talk about the rights of the individual regardless of their differences. They talked to inspectors about how racial differences, disabilities and sexual orientation could lead to prejudicial behaviour, but felt that it would not happen
p.6
Personal development and welfare
in their school. Leaders develop pupils’ SMSC understanding through form time and the wider PSH education curriculum. Pupils are encouraged to participate in a range of extra-curricular activities, including environmental and charity work. Recently, pupils raised money to provide goats for African communities, and there is a ‘Shine’ group that holds coffee mornings to support mental health charities and raise awareness of mental health issues. Pupils benefit from a structured careers programme that is also delivered through ‘skills for life’ sessions and a number of careers events. Leaders are working towards the government’s benchmarks for high-quality careers education. From an early age, pupils develop an awareness of the range of opportunities available to them when they leave school. Pupils’ work over time and across a range of subjects shows that not all pupils take pride in their work. Some pupils do not demonstrate strong attitudes to learning. Work
p.6
Personal development and welfare
is often untidy and disorganised. Some work is incomplete or missing. As a result, some pupils, particularly boys, do not practise what it means to be an effective learner.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Since the last inspection, school behaviour policies have not been enforced consistently across the school. Rewards and sanctions have not been used effectively to improve pupils’ behaviour. Pupils and teachers told inspectors that sometimes poor behaviour went completely unchallenged. This has led to a general deterioration of pupils’ behaviour since the last inspection. The proportion of pupils that are temporarily excluded from school has increased steadily since the last inspection as a result of the deterioration in behaviour. This is particularly true for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND. There are signs that this is beginning to improve, as far fewer pupils have been excluded during the last term. However, it is too soon to determine whether this improvement will be sustained. Pupils’ attendance has declined since the last inspection. Overall attendance is only
p.6
Behaviour
slightly below the national average. However, the proportion of pupils that are regularly absent from school is higher than the national average, particularly for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND. There is some evidence that attendance is beginning to improve but, as with exclusions, this improvement is tentative, and it is too soon to demonstrate that this improvement will be sustained. Since the arrival of the new headteacher, behaviour policies are being put into practice more effectively by staff. Parents, pupils and staff feel that behaviour has improved considerably in the short time since the arrival of the new headteacher. Although pupils are lively, they behave well around the corridors and in social areas. They move promptly to their classrooms at lesson changeover times. Pupils said that this is because more teachers are now on duty and pupils’ behaviour is more closely monitored.
p.7
Behaviour
Leaders use alternative provision effectively to support pupils’ learning. Leaders oversee the personal development, behaviour and safety of pupils in alternative provision. They visit regularly to ensure that the activities and learning that are provided by the alternative provision meet pupils’ needs.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Pupils’ attainment in the published data for GCSE examinations has been strong for the last three years. The proportion of pupils who have attained both English and mathematics at a standard pass or strong pass has been above the national average for the last three years. The proportion of pupils entered for the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) suite of subjects is above the national average. The proportion of pupils that attain a GCSE in all subjects in the EBacc suite of subjects at a standard pass or strong pass has been at least in line with the national average for the last three years. However, pupils’ progress in GCSE examinations has not been as strong. Despite the published measure of overall progress being in line with the national average, there are considerable fluctuations across groups of pupils. In particular, disadvantaged pupils make progress that is well below that of other pupils nationally, and pupils with SEND
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
make progress that is considerably lower than that of all pupils nationally. There are also fluctuations across subject areas. Pupils make strong progress in some subjects, such as languages, design technology and performing arts. However, progress in mathematics, history and geography has been below the national average for some time and shows little sign of improvement. In Years 10 and 11, pupils’ work over time demonstrates that pupils are still not making as much progress as they should. The variations for different groups of pupils and across subjects continue for pupils in key stage 4. Similarly, the differences between the progress of both disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND and others are not closing rapidly. At key stage 3, leaders’ information shows that pupils are making better progress and that the differences for disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND are starting to close. However, pupils’ work does not demonstrate the positive picture seen in leaders’
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
information. There continues to be considerable variation in the quality of work and in pupils’ progress across and within a range of subjects. For example, in geography and mathematics, the quality of pupils’ work was different in different classes. Appropriate careers advice, together with the high proportion of pupils that gain standard or better passes in their GCSEs in both English and mathematics, ensure that they move on to high-quality destinations.
p.8
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
At the time of the last inspection, inconsistencies in teaching and learning in the sixth form were leading to variations in progress across a range of subjects, particularly for A-level subjects. Leaders have monitored the quality of teaching and learning, but this has not led to improvement across all subjects. As a result, the quality of teaching and learning in the sixth form remains variable across subject areas. In the sixth form, just as in the other key stages, teaching is sometimes focused on tasks rather than learning. As a result, students’ knowledge is sometimes superficial; they are unable to recall knowledge and apply it to new tasks. This is particularly true in mathematics, chemistry and history, where students’ progress has been below average for a number of years. Although there has been some improvement for current students, their work in these subjects shows that students continue to make less
p.8
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
progress than they should. Leaders’ expectations are that students’ overall progress this year will be slightly higher than in 2018. Despite leaders’ high expectations, current students do not make consistently good progress across their A-level subjects. Progress in applied courses is much stronger. Students consistently make good progress in these subjects because of the good teaching that they receive. Despite this, there are very few applied courses on offer to students as they move into the sixth form. There are some strengths in the leadership of the sixth form. Leaders have high expectations of students. Students are encouraged to aim high and are supported well in their applications for the next stage of their career. Pastoral provision is strong and there is a variety of extra-curricular activities for students to become engaged in. However, leaders are aware that the sixth-form study programme does not cater for
p.8
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
the needs and interests of many of their students. The SENCo has recently started to work with the head of sixth form to ensure that appropriate and relevant courses are put in place to provide pathways for students with SEND. Leaders plan to introduce a wider range of applied courses to provide a more appropriate balance between A-level and applied courses. Good provision is made to develop students’ PSH education. Students benefit from learning about healthy sexual relationships and the dangers from the misuse of drugs. These are delivered through the regular ‘skills for life’ sessions. However, students feel that they would benefit from more support in some practical areas, such as preparation for living away from home. There is an enrichment programme for sixth-form students. There are opportunities for charity work, particularly within the local community. Many students are involved in a school mentoring programme. Students said that they really value the opportunity to
p.8
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
support younger pupils in the school. They felt that the mentoring programme benefited themselves as much as the younger pupils involved. Learners without sufficiently strong GCSE qualifications in English or mathematics are well supported. Students that re-sit these subjects in the sixth form make good progress. Most students are successful in improving their grade. There is an effective programme of careers advice and guidance. Students receive independent careers advice as well as opportunities to talk to employers and further education providers. There are visits to universities and apprenticeship fairs. As a result, students are able to make appropriate decisions about their future career path. Destinations for students after sixth form help them to make progress towards their chosen career. The vast majority move on to university or higher apprenticeships, although some choose to move into employment.
p.9
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
Students enjoy good relationships with their teachers. They told inspectors that their teachers go ‘above and beyond’ to help them to get the best out of their time in the sixth form. They know that they could talk to their teachers about issues if they needed to. Sixth-form students enjoy their learning. This is evidenced by retention rates that are well above the national average and high levels of attendance. However, students are not always punctual to their lessons. The systems for monitoring students’ punctuality are not effective.
p.9
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.10
School details
Gender of pupils in 16 to 19 study programmes Mixed
p.10
School details
Number of pupils on the school roll 1,405
p.10
School details
Of which, number on roll in 16 to 19 study programmes Appropriate authority The governing body
p.10
School details
Email address manager@ormskirk.lancs.sch.uk
p.10
School details
Date of previous inspection 7–8 February 2017
p.10
Information about this school
Ormskirk School is larger than the average-sized secondary school. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is in line with the national average. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is below the national average. The proportion of pupils with an education, health and care plan is in line with the national average. The proportion of pupils with SEND is in line with the national average. In key stage 4, a small number of pupils attend alternative provision at the Training and Learning Centre, West Lancashire Community High School and BDS Training (Skelmersdale).
p.10
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed teaching and learning across a range of subjects, including by conducting joint observations with school leaders. Inspectors, alongside school leaders, formally scrutinised pupils’ work from Years 7, 8, 9 and 10 across a range of subjects. They also looked at pupils’ work when observing teaching and learning. Inspectors met with the headteacher and other senior leaders. Inspectors spoke with a group of curriculum leaders, teachers and a group of non-teaching staff. Inspectors also met formally with groups of pupils from Years 7, 8, 9 and 10 and students in the sixth form. Inspectors also spoke with pupils informally during social times. An inspector spoke with a group of six governors, including the chair of governors. Inspectors examined a range of documentation, including school policies, safeguarding procedures, leaders’ self-evaluation and leaders’ school improvement plan.
p.12
Information about this inspection
Inspectors considered the 420 responses to the pupil survey, the 128 responses to the online staff questionnaire, the 142 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and the 136 free-text responses from parents.
p.12
Inspection team
Erica Sharman, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.12
Inspection team
Ruth Bradbury Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.12
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.13
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.13
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.13
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.13
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.13
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.13
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.13
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.13
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion