Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Fresh Training Services (UK) Limited

Inspected 13 Jun 2019 · published 18 Jul 2019 · URN 1270916

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Debra Forsythe-Conroy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    13 Jun 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Debra Forsythe-Conroy

  • Postcode verified

    S60 1FE

  • Name on report verified

    Fresh Training Services (UK) Ltd

  • URN verified

    1270916

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−59Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivesafeindependentaccuratelysecure
Criticismslowweaknessesat risktoo manyweakfalling behindconcernconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,258
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Fresh Training Services (UK) Ltd Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Debra Forsythe-Conroy, Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: Fusion@Magna Business Centre Magna Way Rotherham S60 1FE Monitoring visit: Fresh Training Services (UK) Ltd 12–13 June 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook , especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Fresh Training Services (UK) Ltd provides training for 25 apprentices on programmes at levels 2, 3 and 5. Ten apprentices are on standards-based programmes at levels 2 and 3 in health and social care and 15 are on level 5 frameworks in business administration (leadership for the care industry).

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers do not recruit apprentices with integrity. They do not ensure that prospective apprentices are employed appropriately to enable them to complete an apprenticeship. They do not ensure that employers carry out sufficient checks during the recruitment process to confirm that prospective apprentices are suitable for an apprenticeship programme. They have not made employers fully aware of the commitment needed to support the training and learning. Leaders and managers have recognised these weaknesses and that they need to make improvements. They are planning to cease delivery of their health and social care apprenticeships.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers do not ensure that the requirements of an apprenticeship are fully met. For example, apprentices do not receive their entitlement to off-the-job training. Leaders and managers do not plan, monitor or record accurately the elements of the off-the-job training. Just under a half of current apprentices are on zero-hour contracts; therefore, off-the-job training for these apprentices cannot be planned as a proportion of their contracted hours.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers have been slow to intervene when apprentices are at risk of falling behind and, as a result, too many apprentices are beyond their planned end date. Around a quarter of apprentices are between nine and 15 months past the date that they expected to complete the apprenticeship. Leaders and managers have recently recognised this issue and made interventions. However, it is too early to assess the impact of these actions. Monitoring visit: Fresh Training Services (UK) Ltd 12–13 June 2019 Tutors do not establish the skills that apprentices have at the start of their programme and, therefore, are unable to meet the individual needs of apprentices. They do not identify the new skills that apprentices need to develop. Tutors focus appropriately on developing apprentices’ knowledge about the theory elements of their programme and its application to work role roles.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Tutors do not review well enough apprentices’ learning in their off-the-job training. They do not plan programmes carefully enough to ensure that apprentices gain sufficient off-the-job training. They monitor overall progress towards completion of apprentices’ programme as a percentage but do not monitor how new skills are acquired from the off-the-job training or make sufficient reference to this training in reviews. As a result of weak planning and monitoring, apprentices make slow progress in developing new skills. Managers have identified areas for improvement in the quality of provision but have been slow to make improvements in apprentices’ progress and achievement. They do not monitor the progress of apprentices who need to gain a functional skills qualification. For apprentices who already hold qualifications in English and mathematics, tutors do not develop these skills further.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers have made effective arrangements for the end-point assessment for apprentices and have communicated this well to staff, employers and apprentices.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Staff are well qualified to deliver across the range and levels of apprenticeship programmes.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Tutors do not focus sufficiently on the development of new skills when providing feedback following assessments. They do not identify where apprentices can develop their English skills other than by reference to spelling, punctuation and grammar.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Recently, leaders have appointed new assessors to support apprentices in completing their programme. Assessors have taken a number of specific actions to support and provide feedback to apprentices who have fallen behind. This includes one-to-one meetings in which they develop individual plans to support apprentices. In a few instances this has helped apprentices to increase their pace of progress, but there are still too many apprentices who have passed their planned end date. Monitoring visit: Fresh Training Services (UK) Ltd 12–13 June 2019

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers ensure that safeguarding is prioritised, and that staff are appropriately trained. They have designated staff for safeguarding who have had further in-depth training. They have implemented appropriate safeguarding policies and review them regularly.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers undertake risk assessments as part of the employer induction. Apprentices have a good understanding of how to be safe in the workplace and know whom to contact if a concern arises. Apprentices are informed about safeguarding at their induction and their understanding is checked during reviews.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders have a well-developed ‘Prevent’ duty action plan that identifies local risks and they have good links with the regional ‘Prevent’ coordinator. They have not yet identified the risks that relate to the wider geographical areas in which they operate.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers carry out Disclosure and Barring Service checks for all staff and record staff information in a single central register. They have been trained in safe recruitment practices and implement pre-employment checks for all new staff. Monitoring visit: Fresh Training Services (UK) Ltd 12–13 June 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.5

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion