Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Neasden Primary School

Inspected 20 Jun 2019 · URN 140247

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    20 Jun 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Clennan

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    HU8 0QB

  • Name on report verified

    Neasden Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedgood progresshigh expectationshappypositivestrongstrengthseffective
Criticismconcernsbelowlackharmoverlooked

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1387w+70
  • What needs to improve73w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,451
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 50
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Nicola Loten Headteacher Neasden Primary School Neasden Close Wembley Park Avenue Hull HU8 0QB

p.1

Short inspection of Neasden Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 20 June 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in July 2015.

p.1

Short inspection of Neasden Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You command respect and are highly regarded by staff, pupils, parents and carers. Trust leaders also value the way you lead the school. Since the last inspection, you have continued to develop your leadership team. Leaders and governors have an accurate view of the strengths and priorities for improvement to ensure the further development of the school. You ensure that the members of your leadership team are experts in their areas of responsibility, resulting in leaders providing effective coaching for all staff.

p.1

Short inspection of Neasden Primary School

You and your assistant headteacher have created a happy and friendly school where pupils and staff thrive. Your school motto, ‘Aim high and reach for the sky,’ permeates the school. One pupil told me that it means if you keep trying your best now, you will be even better when you are older. Governors are rightly proud of the varied curriculum offered to pupils. They ensure that additional funding is well spent. Together, you create a wealth of opportunities beyond the school day, whether this is music or sports clubs.

p.1

Short inspection of Neasden Primary School

Pupils and parents who made their views known are overwhelmingly positive about the school. Typical comments by parents were about how happy their children are at school and that staff are very approachable. Pupils told me that Neasden is a friendly school. The strengths identified in pupils’ behaviour found at the last inspection have been maintained. Pupils are kind, polite and know who to talk to if there are any worries. Pupils told me that ‘adults will sort things out’ if they have any concerns. At the last inspection, you were asked to improve how teachers identify spelling mistakes in pupils’ work. Regular audits take place and spellings are consistently corrected. The teaching of spelling is now taught in a systematic way. You were also asked to move the most able pupils on more quickly in their work. As a result, the proportion of pupils reaching the higher standards by the end of key stage 1

p.1

Short inspection of Neasden Primary School

and key stage 2 in 2018 have improved and are in line with pupils nationally.

p.2

Short inspection of Neasden Primary School

Key stage 2 reading, writing and mathematics results in 2018, for attainment and progress, were much improved. However, leaders know that sustaining this attainment is an important next step.

p.2

Short inspection of Neasden Primary School

The last inspection report also asked leaders to improve pupils’ basic mathematics facts, so they can progress more quickly to complex calculations and solve mathematical problems. You have addressed this well. A new mathematics curriculum has significantly impacted on mathematical knowledge for all pupils. The positive effect of staff training on developing pupils’ mathematical vocabulary and fluency is clearly evident in pupils’ books. Pupils take pride in their work and present it neatly. Work is adapted well to meet pupils’ varying needs. Older pupils are provided with good opportunities to develop their problem-solving and reasoning skills. Pupils are moved on to more challenging work quickly. Attainment in mathematics has risen. In Year 6 in 2018, the proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard was considerably above average, as was their progress. The proportion reaching the higher standard also improved considerably and was slightly

p.2

Short inspection of Neasden Primary School

Leaders and governors have created a strong culture of safeguarding. They are meticulous in their record-keeping and procedures. Staff record any vulnerability concerns centrally. Leaders then use this information to seek advice. You are ably supported by your learning mentor, who ensures that pupils’ emotional needs are meet through daily ‘check-ins’. As a result, vulnerable pupils are in school and the additional support some families need at home is quickly accessed.

p.2

Short inspection of Neasden Primary School

Pupils’ safety is paramount and their attendance levels are improving. Pupils who made their views known told me that they feel safe and that they learn about all aspects of safety, for example pedestrian safety on the local estate and how to keep safe online. Parents’ responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, show that parents believe that their child feels safe and happy at your school. All staff and governors have received and read up-to-date documentation about safeguarding and child protection, so that they can protect pupils from harm. Designated safeguarding leads have impressive training records, highlighting the importance of safeguarding for all in school.

p.2

Inspection findings

 In 2018, the proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard by the end of key stage 2 improved considerably in reading, writing and mathematics and was above average, especially in mathematics. An above-average proportion of pupils also reached the higher standards in writing and mathematics. This represents good progress from pupils’ previous starting points. At the end of key stage 1, the proportion of pupils reaching the expected and higher standards in these subjects, although also improved, remained below average. Improvement in key stage 1 has not been as good as in key stage 2. During the inspection, therefore, I wanted to find out if children are getting off to a good start in the early years and current pupils are making good progress in key stage 1.  Children start school in the early years with skills below typical for their age, particularly in communication, literacy and numeracy. Your assistant headteacher

p.3

Inspection findings

and I visited the early years, seeing clear routines and high expectations of children. In Nursery, children are becoming increasingly independent. Adults have revised their approaches to teaching so that conversations with children are more focused. Adults model high expectations for children. In a Reception writing session, the teacher modelled correct letter formation and layout. Children responded by looking carefully at their work and making adjustments.  Effective early years provision means that children’s learning is getting off to a good start. Children are making good progress from their starting points. In 2018, the proportion of children reaching a good level of development by the end of the Reception Year improved and was much closer to average. The large majority of children are well prepared for learning in Year 1.  In the last three years, the proportion of pupils reaching the expected standards

p.3

Inspection findings

in the Year 1 phonics screening check, although improving steadily, has remained below average. Attainment in reading by the end of Year 2 also improved in 2018 but, again, remained slightly below average. Therefore, I wanted to check whether the quality of teaching of phonics and early reading is good and check if current pupils are making good progress.  Together, we observed a range of phonics sessions and I listened to several pupils read. The recent changes you have made to the teaching of phonics are paying off. Expectations of what pupils can achieve have been raised. This is having a positive effect on pupils’ attitudes to learning. In early years, teachers have strong subject knowledge and they model the correct letter sounds. Adults use assessment information effectively to ensure that children receive same-day additional support to practise the sounds they have learned. Opportunities for

p.3

Inspection findings

children to receive targeted support from adults have been increased. Similarly, in key stage 1, teachers regularly check on individual pupils’ reading so that they spot any emerging issues and adapt future learning accordingly. As a result of the improvements made, achievement in reading in both of these key stages has improved.  For the most part, across the school pupils read books that are carefully matched to their stage of development. Pupils in key stage 2 told me that they read a great range of books. They value the harder texts they hear in whole-class reading and are keen to develop their reading so that they can read these texts independently. However, some lower-attaining children in early years and in key stage 1 lack confidence and fluency in being able to decode their books. They rely heavily on segmenting and blending. Opportunities to re-read familiar books to build these skills up are sometimes overlooked. Making sure that this is

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 in early years and key stage 1, pupils re-read familiar books to develop confidence and fluency.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kingston upon Hull City Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During this one-day inspection, I observed teaching and learning and scrutinised examples of pupils’ work, alongside both you and your leadership team. I met with you and senior leaders. I met with five governors. I also met with the chief executive officer and the school improvement leader for the multi-academy trust. I spoke with eight pupils in a discussion group and with pupils informally in lessons and around the school. I also listened to several pupils read.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I evaluated the 25 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and met with a group of parents. I also took account of the 17 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire. I reviewed a range of school documents. These included: the school’s self-evaluation of its overall effectiveness; the school’s development plans; and safeguarding documentation. I also considered information posted on the school’s website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion