Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder in Redcar and Cleveland

Inspected 20 Jun 2019 · published 9 Jul 2019 · URN EY286425

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Elizabeth Fish

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Jun 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Elizabeth Fish

  • Early years verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder report

  • URN verified

    EY286425

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−24Mixedmore positive than 13% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyhappyconfidentlyeffectivesettledsafe
Criticismweaknessesrequires improvementnot alwaysnot sufficientlyconcernsnot successfulnot rigorousnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings153w0
  • What needs to improve799w−31

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
922
about usual (typical 743)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 11%What needs to improve 59%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection date 20 June 2019 Previous inspection date 23 May 2016

p.1

3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2

p.1

3

Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This is a provision that requires improvement

n Not all children make the progress of which they are capable. This is because the childminder does not always consider children's individual needs and stages of development when planning activities. As a result, not all activities provide an appropriate level of challenge and children lose interest. n The childminder does not have a good enough understanding of the requirement to complete the progress check for children aged between two and three years and to share a written summary with parents. n The childminder does not gather information from parents about what children already know and can do when they first start attending. n Self-evaluation is not sufficiently successful in clearly identifying areas for development, including professional development, to improve the overall provision and the learning opportunities for children.

p.1

It has the following strengths

n The childminder has a good relationship with the children in her care. Children are cared for in a home-from-home environment. Older children enjoy attending and playing games based on well-known television shows. n Children are happy and settled in the childminder's home. They confidently select activities to play with. n The childminder places a high priority on children's safety. She has thorough risk assessments in place to help keep children safe. n The childminder has a good relationship with local schools. They talk together about what children have been doing and she builds on topics such as 'under the sea,' which children have enjoyed in school.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must: Due date consider children's individual needs, interests and stages of development and use this information to plan challenging and enjoyable learning experiences 05/07/2019

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

provide parents with a written summary of the progress check for children aged between two and three years, and encourage parents to share this information with their health visitor to support partnership working. 05/07/2019

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

n gather information from parents about what children already know and can do when they first start attending n use self-evaluation to identify and address any weaknesses in provision and to help identify professional development opportunities in order to improve the overall quality of practice.

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

n The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. n The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the childminder. n The inspector held a number of discussions with the childminder. She looked at relevant documentation and evidence of the suitability of persons living in the household. n The inspector spoke to children during the inspection. n The inspector took account of the views of parents through written feedback provided.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement

The ongoing self-evaluation process is not rigorous enough to identify all weaknesses in practice. The childminder has not identified professional development opportunities to strengthen her knowledge and skills, particularly in relation to the learning and development requirements of the early years foundation stage. For example, she is not aware of the requirement to encourage parents to share with other professionals the summary of the progress check for children aged between two and three years. The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The childminder has a very good knowledge of the signs and symptoms that may indicate possible abuse to children. She knows who to contact should she have any concerns about children's welfare. The childminder maintains a general overview of children's learning.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Although the childminder is well qualified, she does not always consider children's individual stages of development or what they need to learn next when planning activities. As a result, not all activities provide suitable levels of challenge. For example, the childminder provides activities which focus on recognising numbers, even though this is not appropriate for children's stage of development. This causes children to lose interest in activities because the activity is too challenging for them. In addition, the childminder has not completed or provided parents with a written summary of the progress check for children aged between two and three years. She does not gather information about children's learning and development from parents when children first start. However, the childminder helps children to recognise colours and she notices what children are interested in and provides resources to support this, for example, as she

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

plays alongside children as they build a train track.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good

Despite not receiving high levels of challenge in their learning, children generally enjoy taking part in the activities provided for them each day. Older children enjoy playing in the childminder's garden. The childminder provides good levels of care for children. She attends to their individual physical needs. For example, she walks to school so that younger children can sleep in the pushchair. She ensures children enjoy plenty of fresh air and exercise. The childminder helps children to understand how they can keep themselves healthy. For instance, they wash their hands before eating. They demonstrate a good understanding of rules and expectations. Children demonstrate this as they tidy toys away when they have finished using them.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Some children do not make enough progress and are not challenged to a high enough level. However, children enjoy choosing their own activities. They build with train tracks and begin to explore how they can fit the pieces of track together. Children begin to show some awareness of quantity. They demonstrate this as they tell the childminder they have 'two trains'. This helps children to develop some of the skills they require in readiness for starting school.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY286425 Local authority Redcar and Cleveland Inspection number 10073396 Type of provision Childminder

p.4

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 1 - 10 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 13 Date of previous inspection 23 May 2016

p.4

Registers

The childminder registered in 2004 and lives in Marske by the Sea. She operates all year round from 7.30am to 5.30pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year- old children. She holds an appropriate qualification at level 3.

p.4

Registers

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

Registers

procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Registers

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Registers

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.5

Registers

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .

p.5

Registers

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion