Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Construction Works (Hull) Limited

Inspected 5 Jun 2019 · published 8 Jul 2019 · URN 1280305

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrea Shepherd

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    5 Jun 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrea Shepherd

  • Postcode verified

    HU1 2PG

  • Name on report verified

    Construction Works (Hull) Limited

  • URN verified

    1280305

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+18Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivehighly effectivesafesuccessfulindependentstrengthsrobust
Criticismlimitedconcernsnot sufficientlytoo slowfalling behindlacksunclearnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,518
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 32, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Construction Works (Hull) Limited Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Andrea Shepherd, Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: 27–29 Anlaby Road Hull HU1 2PG Monitoring visit: Construction Works (Hull) Limited, 4–5 June 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Construction Works (Hull) Limited (Construction Works) was established in 2005 as a funded local labour project. At the time of the monitoring visit, 17 apprentices were on standards-based apprenticeships and 37 on apprenticeship frameworks delivered directly by Construction Works. Another 26 apprentices are with a subcontractor on standards-based refrigeration and business administration apprenticeships at levels 2 and 3. Non-levy paying organisations in the Hull area employ almost all apprentices that attend Construction Works. The vast majority of these apprentices are on engineering programmes at levels 2 or 3, with the remainder on business administration, management or customer-service programmes at levels 2 to 5.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers design programmes that provide good opportunities for apprentices to improve their knowledge and skills. As a result, unemployed people and those from areas of high social deprivation are supported well to gain employment. Leaders communicate effectively with employers to ensure that programmes meet their needs. Staff recruit apprentices with integrity.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers recruit highly experienced and well-qualified staff, who make good use of their expertise to develop apprentices’ knowledge, skills and behaviours. However, leaders and managers do not use professional development effectively to ensure that it results in rapid enough improvements to the quality of provision.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers make effective use of feedback from apprentices about the quality of physical resources to make improvements to the learning environment. For example, apprentices requested more space for independent study and, in response, leaders recently installed a mezzanine floor to create space to complete written work. Monitoring visit: Construction Works (Hull) Limited, 4–5 June 2019 Leaders and managers make accurate assessments of the strengths and areas for improvement across the organisation. They have sufficient oversight of their provision, and this ensures that they meet all the apprenticeship requirements. However, quality improvement processes are often informal and many of the actions to support improvement are not sufficiently focused, which hinders the pace of improvement. Progress to support the transition from frameworks to standards is too slow.

p.2

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have an effective approach to managing the subcontractor. They have implemented a robust process for due diligence that validates successfully the subcontractor’s suitability to deliver an apprenticeship programme. Managers’ plans to quality assure the subcontractor are thorough and appropriately challenging. As the provision that the subcontractor delivers is new, it is too early to assess the impact of these plans.

p.3

Reasonable progress

When staff identify that apprentices are falling behind, they intervene quickly and very effectively to provide support. For example, apprentices struggling with English receive a learning plan that their employers agree to ensure that they catch up. As a result of this support, the large majority of apprentices remain on their programme. However, leaders and managers do not make sufficient use of their system to monitor apprentices’ progress and their off-the-job training. Managers check apprentices’ progress three months from completion, but this is often too late to identify and take actions to ensure that apprentices complete by their planned end date.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Apprentices receive their entitlement to off-the-job training. Managers and tutors work well with employers to ensure that apprentices develop skills that meet employers’ business needs. Managers provide an effective recruitment and induction programme that identifies apprentices’ starting points and aspirations accurately. As a result, they design programmes that meet apprentices’ needs.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Tutors deliver effective off-the-job training and, as a result, apprentices develop substantial new vocational knowledge, skills and behaviours. For example, engineering apprentices fabricate shop signs. Business administration apprentices can explain legal structures and apply them effectively to their own organisation.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers ensure that the training centre is well equipped with up-to- date industry-standard equipment so that apprentices can practise and develop new skills during their off-the-job training. As a result, apprentices develop confidence in their knowledge, skills and behaviours which they apply effectively in the workplace by, for example, using different welding techniques. Monitoring visit: Construction Works (Hull) Limited, 4–5 June 2019 Almost all apprentices produce work of at least the expected standard and in many cases of a high standard. Tutors support apprentices effectively to develop English and mathematics skills. For example, engineering apprentices are confident in calculating heating curves and measuring the radius when producing gauges. Tutors ensure that all apprentices pass external online tests, and most apprentices are successful at their first attempt.

p.3

Reasonable progress

Tutors’ feedback to apprentices on the development of their skills supports apprentices to make rapid improvements. For example, apprentices received effective feedback about how to file steel to get a rounded angle when producing a gauge. However, tutors’ feedback on apprentices’ written work does not identify clearly enough what apprentices need to do to improve their writing.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Tutors do not take sufficient account of apprentices’ individual needs when planning lessons. As a result, they do not challenge a minority of the most able apprentices sufficiently to achieve higher grades. Tutors do not use progress reviews well enough to identify clearly the progress that apprentices make in developing their knowledge, skills and behaviours.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have developed a comprehensive strategy to ensure that all apprentices receive support to stay safe and look after their own well-being. Designated safeguarding staff have high levels of experience and appropriate qualifications. They receive regular updates and have highly effective links with local agencies. Managers provide very successful support to apprentices when they encounter problems, such as mental health issues and domestic difficulties.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers implement appropriate policies and procedures for safeguarding apprentices, complying with the ‘Prevent’ duty and the safe recruitment of staff. They review and update policies regularly. However, the `Prevent’ duty risk assessment action plan lacks specific detail to show the steps that managers take to minimise risk.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Tutors provide useful guidance on safeguarding and the ‘Prevent’ duty to apprentices and employers during induction. Apprentices receive regular and beneficial guidance on how to stay safe online. As a result, apprentices are safe and know whom they should contact if they have any concerns.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentices have a clear understanding of safety and demonstrate safe working practices. They assess risks at work and ensure that they use appropriate personal protective equipment, supervised by tutors, in the workshop. Leaders and managers do not systematically check that tutors understood all the information that they receive about safeguarding and that they communicate it to Monitoring visit: Construction Works (Hull) Limited, 4–5 June 2019 apprentices clearly. A very small minority of apprentices are unclear about how to protect themselves from risks associated with radicalisation and extremism. Monitoring visit: Construction Works (Hull) Limited, 4–5 June 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Reasonable progress

Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.6

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion