Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)

Childminder in Milton Keynes

Inspected 19 Jun 2019 · published 8 Jul 2019 · URN EY363252

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Jun 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    Hayley Marshall-Gowen

  • Early years verified

    Outstanding

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Outstanding

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Name on report verified

    Childminder report

  • URN verified

    EY363252

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Early yearsOutstanding
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−46Criticalmore positive than 48% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodMetRINot metInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseconfidentstrong relationshipsknowledgeableweaknessesclearsettled
Criticismat risknot effectiveweaknessnot confidentnot alwaysharmdeclinedo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings323w−51
  • Leadership141w−20
  • What needs to improve452w−27

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
904
about usual (typical 886)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 47
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 7
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 24%Leadership 10%What needs to improve 33%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

Inspection date 19 June 2019 Previous inspection date 19 November 2014

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Previous inspection: Outstanding 1 Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4

p.1

This inspection: Inadequate 4

Outcomes for children Requires improvement

p.1

This provision is inadequate

n The childminder does not ensure that her assistants complete all checks required by Ofsted to ensure that they are suitable to work with children. n The childminder does not undertake training to enable her to identify all behaviours that might suggest that children are at risk of harm, specifically those at risk of being drawn into extreme behaviours. As a result, she is not fully aware of all aspects of safeguarding children. n There are no arrangements in place for supervising the work of assistants. The childminder does not offer assistants enough support to develop their role and enhance learning experiences for children. n Assessments of children's learning between the ages of two and three years are not an accurate reflection of what children know and can do. n The childminder does not always find ways to encourage less confident children's active involvement in group activities.

p.1

It has the following strengths

n The childminder works with parents and shares information with them about children's care routines. Parents are complimentary about the childminder and the care that she provides for children. n Older children learn about different mathematical words and concepts. They identify and name shapes and use different words to describe things, such as 'twins', when finding two.

p.1

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date ensure that all assistants complete required information to enable Ofsted to confirm their suitability to work with children 31/07/2019

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

improve knowledge of safeguarding children, specifically in relation to the 'Prevent' duty guidance 31/07/2019

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

implement arrangements to supervise the work of assistants, providing support and coaching to help them in their role 31/07/2019

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

ensure that the progress check for children between the age of two and three years is a clear written account of children's progress and provides parents with information to support their next steps in learning. 31/07/2019

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

n encourage further ways to build on children's resilience and confidence in group situations.

p.2

What the setting needs to do to improve further

n The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. n The inspector discussed a spontaneous activity with the childminder. n The inspector held discussions with the childminder and children at suitable times. She looked at relevant documentation, such as evidence of the suitability of the childminder and her assistants. n The inspector read and took account of the written feedback provided by parents.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate

Safeguarding is not effective. The childminder does not ensure that assistants who work with her infrequently have had all required suitability checks. Although the childminder ensures that all assistants have a Disclosure and Barring Service check, she does not ensure they complete the required checks with Ofsted to confirm their suitability. This poses a potential risk for children. The childminder completes some safeguarding training. However, the training she undertakes does not provide her with enough information to identify all risks to children. The childminder does not actively monitor the work of her assistant. She does not provide coaching and supervision to support assistants in developing their role and increasing their effectiveness. The childminder is highly qualified and knowledgeable about children's development. However, she is not aware of the weaknesses that have led to a decline in the quality of her provision.

p.3

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement

Overall, the quality of the childminder's teaching is good. She supports children to find out about things that they do not know. When children discover a shape that is unfamiliar, they compare this to shapes they know and use information sheets to look up what the shape is called. This helps to expand on children's vocabulary and enhances their understanding that they can use different ways to find out new things. The childminder's assessments of children's learning are not effective. She has recently changed the format of her progress check for children between the ages of two and three. The new format that she uses does not provide parents with a written summary of children's progress or suggest specific next steps to help support their learning.

p.3

Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate

The weakness in safeguarding has a negative impact on children's well-being. However, children are calm and settled and the childminder shows them genuine care and affection. Children develop strong relationships with the childminder. They play in the garden where they have ample opportunities for testing out their physical skills. They pedal bicycles and play in sand. Children are confident in their movements, balancing, sliding and crawling as they explore the climbing frame. Children make choices about their play. Some children are not confident in group situations and do not take part in activities, despite showing interest. At times, the childminder does not find ways to successfully engage them.

p.3

Outcomes for children require improvement

Children make typical progress for their age. However, without fully accurate assessments, children are not stimulated to make the best possible progress. Children develop the muscles in their hands in different ways. At snack time, children use safety knives to cut up their fruit. When getting ready to go outside and play, children learn to fasten the straps on their shoes and make attempts to tie their laces. These activities help to contribute towards children's development in readiness for learning to write. Children are confident talkers who express themselves. They behave well and follow simple rules. Children are beginning to learn some of the skills that they need to prepare them for moving on in their learning.

p.3

Setting details

Unique reference number EY363252 Local authority Milton Keynes Inspection number 10108668 Type of provision Childminder

p.4

Registers

Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 2 - 9 Total number of places 18 Number of children on roll 10 Date of previous inspection 19 November 2014

p.4

Registers

The childminder registered in 2007. She works with two assistants and lives in Kents Hill, Milton Keynes. The childminder receives funding for the provision of free early education for children age three and four years. The childminder is qualified at degree level in early years and one of her assistants holds a recognised qualification at level 3. The childminder provides childcare from Monday to Friday, all year round, from 8am to 6pm.

p.4

Registers

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.

p.4

Registers

procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.4

Registers

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Registers

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk

p.5

Registers

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .

p.5

Registers

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion