Social care · Social care monitoring visit
Children's home run by St Christopher’s Fellowship in Wandsworth
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
10 Jun 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Sharon Payne
- Name on report verified
1159755
- URN verified
1159755
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Any external agency staff should meet the requirements in regulation 32(4) regarding mandatory qualifications and the registered person should consider their skills, qualifications and any induction necessary before they commence work in the home. p.4
- The capacity and competence of staff to build constructive, warm relationships with children that actively promote positive behaviour, provides the foundations for managing any negative behaviour. p.4
- Staff should have the skills to respond to each child’s individual behaviour. p.4
- Where necessary they should manage conflict, maintain constructive dialogues and react appropriately if challenged by a child in their care. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 140
- shorter than usual (typical 566)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 24, typical 46
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for children's home - monitoring visit: 1159755 1 Monitoring visit Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children's home
This home provides periods of residential care for up to four girls, aged between 12 and 17 years, who are at risk in their communities. This may, for example, be due to the risk of child sexual exploitation, gang affiliation, trafficking or a combination of these risk factors.
p.1
Information about this children's home
The manager was registered in November 2017.
p.1
This monitoring visit
Ofsted was informed by an anonymous complainant that an incident had allegedly occurred whereby a member of staff allegedly threatened to ‘beat up’ a young person. The complainant stated that young people and other staff had heard this threat and the member of staff was cursing the young person and said things like ‘by the end of this night shift, I’ll be finished with her’; ‘her’ being the young person.
p.1
This monitoring visit
The complainant stated that the registered manager was notified of this alleged incident, but that the registered manager had failed to take appropriate action. The complainant highlighted that the member of staff is still working at the home and has been givien the role as an administrator.
p.1
This monitoring visit
This visit involved the inspector examining emails regarding this incident, reviewing staff supervision records and the probation report for the identified member of staff, a supervision record for the team leader who oversaw this incident and the internal investigation report regarding this incident.
p.1
This monitoring visit
The inspector held individual discussions with the registered manager, a regional manager and the staff member involved in this incident. A group discussion was also held by the inspector with two young people. Inspection report for children's home - monitoring visit: 1159755 2 This incident occurred in December 2018. It involved a member of staff ‘shouting’, during a verbal exchange with a young person. It is clear that the heated verbal exchange was managed inappropriately by the member of staff, and indeed the young person was not treated with the necessary understanding and respect.
p.1
This monitoring visit
The member of staff demonstrated a lack of maturity and professional and personal boundaries with this young person. Although this member of staff did not threaten the young person to her face, she did admit to venting her frustrations in the staff office. This involved shouting and swearing, which was inappropriate and highly unprofessional.
p.2
This monitoring visit
The registered manager undertook her own internal investigation and the agency was also asked to investigate this matter. The member of staff was employed as an agency worker at the time and was removed from working on shifts in the home; however, she had already been appointed to a permanent administration post in the home. The member of staff was appointed to the administrator post in March 2019. Reflective work was undertaken by the registered manager with the member of staff after the incident and expectations regarding staff conduct were reinforced.
p.2
This monitoring visit
Records of the internal investigation showed that the young person said that they did not recall hearing the member of staff venting their frustration in the staff office. Formerly the member of staff had a very close relationship with this young person, however, their professional boundaries were blurred. Records of the internal investigation noted that the young person had stated that they did not wish to complain and confirmed that this situation was resolved effectively with both the young person and the member of staff apologising to each other.
p.2
This monitoring visit
Leaders and managers felt that this member of staff had learned from their mistakes and is suitable to work in the home, but not directly with children. The home has learned from this incident. The induction and supervision arrangements have been improved for agency staff. There is also a moving away from using agency staff and to the organisation employing its own team of bank staff.
p.2
This monitoring visit
During the inspector’s interview with the member of staff, they expressed appropriate remorse. The member of staff acknowledged their inappropriate behaviour and learning from this incident. This member of staff is monitored closely and receives regular supervision and there are no further issues regarding the boundaries that they maintain with young people. This member of staff is still on their probation and they do not work directly with young people.
p.2
This monitoring visit
During the visit young people confirmed that they felt safe and that there are no issues with staff shouting at them. Young people were able to inform the inspector of a number of independent persons and organisations that they would contact if they had any concerns. Young people were seen to interact positively with staff and Inspection report for children's home - monitoring visit: 1159755 3 they looked happy and comfortable.
p.2
This monitoring visit
There are no current safeguarding concerns.
p.3
Recent inspection history
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement 08/05/2018 Full Outstanding 11/07/2017 Full Good 16/11/2016 Interim Sustained effectiveness 06/06/2016 Full Good Inspection report for children's home - monitoring visit: 1159755 4
p.3
Recommendations
Any external agency staff should meet the requirements in regulation 32(4) regarding mandatory qualifications and the registered person should consider their skills, qualifications and any induction necessary before they commence work in the home. ('Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards', page 54, paragraph 10.16)
p.4
Recommendations
The capacity and competence of staff to build constructive, warm relationships with children that actively promote positive behaviour, provides the foundations for managing any negative behaviour. Staff should have the skills to respond to each child’s individual behaviour. Where necessary they should manage conflict, maintain constructive dialogues and react appropriately if challenged by a child in their care. ('Guide to the children's homes regulations including the quality standards', page 39, paragraph 8.14)
p.4
Information about this inspection
The purpose of this visit was to follow up concerns raised in an anonymous complaint sent to Ofsted.
p.4
Information about this inspection
This inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000.
p.4
Inspector
Sharon Payne, social care inspector Inspection report for children's home - monitoring visit: 1159755 5 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.5
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion