Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Sunderland
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
14 Jun 2019
- Inspectors verified
Elizabeth Fish
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY548927
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality of teaching requires improvement. p.1
- The childminder does not always use information from observations swiftly enough to identify precisely where children are in their learning and to plan challenging and enjoyable learning experiences. p.1
- As a result, children do not make the progress of which they are capable. p.1
- The progress check for children aged between two and three years is not always accurate, and it does not contain all required information. p.1
- In addition, the childminder does not encourage parents to share the summary with their health visitor. p.1
- This does not support partnership working. p.1
- The childminder has not established a consistent two-way flow of information with parents to enable her to meet children's needs effectively. p.1
- Self-evaluation is not sufficiently developed to clearly identify areas for development, including professional development, to improve the overall provision and the learning p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 913
- about usual (typical 743)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date 14 June 2019 Previous inspection date Not applicable
p.1
3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2
p.1
3
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This is a provision that requires improvement
n The quality of teaching requires improvement. The childminder does not always use information from observations swiftly enough to identify precisely where children are in their learning and to plan challenging and enjoyable learning experiences. As a result, children do not make the progress of which they are capable. n The progress check for children aged between two and three years is not always accurate, and it does not contain all required information. In addition, the childminder does not encourage parents to share the summary with their health visitor. This does not support partnership working. n The childminder has not established a consistent two-way flow of information with parents to enable her to meet children's needs effectively. n Self-evaluation is not sufficiently developed to clearly identify areas for development, including professional development, to improve the overall provision and the learning
p.1
It has the following strengths
n Children are happy and settled in the childminder's home. They confidently select activities to play with. Parents comment that their children love going to her house and often do not want to leave at the end of the day. n The childminder places a high priority on children's safety. She has thorough risk assessments in place to help keep children safe. For example, she has well-thought-out procedures in place to keep children safe when they leave the home or go on outings.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must: Due date use observations to identify precisely where children are in their learning, and use this information to plan challenging and enjoyable learning experiences 28/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
complete an accurate progress check for children aged between two and three years, and encourage parents to share this with their health visitor to support partnership working 28/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
establish an effective two-way flow of information to meet children's individual needs. 28/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n use self-evaluation to identify and address any weaknesses in provision and to help identify where professional development opportunities can be accessed to improve the overall quality of practice.
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. n The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the childminder. n The inspector held a number of discussions with the childminder. She looked at relevant documentation and evidence of the suitability of persons living in the household. n The inspector spoke to children during the inspection. n The inspector took account of the views of parents through written feedback provided.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
The ongoing self-evaluation process is not rigorous enough to identify all weaknesses in practice, particularly in relation to the learning and development requirements of the early years foundation stage. For example, the childminder is not aware of the requirement to encourage parents to share the summary of the progress check for children aged between two and three years with other professionals. The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. The childminder has a very good knowledge of the signs and symptoms that may indicate possible abuse to children. She knows who to contact should she have any concerns about children's welfare. She has a good understanding of wider safeguarding issues, such as the 'Prevent' duty guidance. The childminder has detailed policies and procedures which underpin her practice well
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Although the childminder is well qualified, she does not consistently use assessments of children's learning to understand their individual stage of development and to plan challenging learning experiences that support their good progress. For example, she plans activities to encourage children to speak in sentences and respond to questions, even though this does not support children's level of communication. Due to weaknesses in assessments, the progress check for children aged between two and three years is not accurate and does not identify all areas where children need support. The childminder does not gather information about children's learning and development from parents, particularly when children first start. Furthermore, she does not share sufficient information with them about children's learning. However, the childminder plays alongside children and demonstrates new ways of doing things. The childminder notices
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
what children are interested in and provides resources to support this. For example, she provides water play activities to support children who enjoy playing with water.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good
Despite not receiving high levels of challenge in their learning, children are motivated to take part in the activities provided for them each day. Young children engage deeply in water play. For instance, they use spades to splash in water and transfer sand into the water tray. The childminder provides good levels of care for children. She attends to their individual physical needs and ensures children enjoy plenty of fresh air and exercise. She demonstrates this as she helps children to put on their waterproof suits and wellington boots to play outside in the puddles. Children behave well. The childminder has clear behavioural expectations which she consistently reinforces.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Some children do not make enough progress and are not challenged to a high enough level. Despite this, they confidently explore the indoor and outdoor environments and are inquisitive, curious learners. Children are keen to paint with water and play in the tent outside. They demonstrate curiosity as the childminder adds foam to the water tray. They begin to count with some numbers in order. This helps children to develop some of the skills they require, in readiness for school.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY548927 Local authority Sunderland Inspection number 10109528 Type of provision Childminder
p.4
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 1 - 11 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 4 Date of previous inspection Not applicable
p.4
Registers
The childminder registered in 2017 and lives in Plains Farm, Sunderland. She operates all year round from 8am to 6pm, Monday to Friday, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder holds an appropriate childcare qualification at level 3.
p.4
Registers
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Registers
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Registers
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Registers
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.5
Registers
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.5
Registers
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion