Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Queen's Park Academy

Inspected 12 Jun 2019 · published 2 Jul 2019 · URN 136660

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Nick Templeton (lead), John Constable

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Jun 2019

  • Inspectors verified

    John Constable, Nick Templeton

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    MK40 4HA

  • Name on report verified

    Queen’s Park Academy

  • URN verified

    136660

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+14Mostly positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectiveeffectivelywell supportedhigh expectationswell-behavedfeel safesafe
Criticismrequires improvementnot strongbelowconcernsweaknot consistentlynot alwaysnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings709w−13
  • Leadership123w+44
  • Safeguarding167w+43
  • What needs to improve1493w+25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,426
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 23%Leadership 4%Safeguarding 5%What needs to improve 48%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Queen’s Park Academy Chestnut Avenue, Bedford, Bedfordshire MK40 4HA

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Early years provision Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is not consistently strong across the school.  Recently, leaders have introduced new initiatives across the school to improve writing and a new way of teaching phonics, but the impact is not yet evident in pupils’ progress and attainment.  Teachers’ assessment and tracking of pupils’ progress in some year groups are not accurate, which means that planning does not match the needs of the pupils and expectations are not high enough.  The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is not consistent in early years.  When leaders have identified areas for improvement, they have not always brought about change quickly enough.  Pupils’ attainment in reading, writing and mathematics, at all key stages, is below the national average.  Pupils do not make strong enough progress in reading and writing during their time at the school.  The most able pupils are not challenged

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

sufficiently to enable them to reach the higher standards in reading and mathematics or greater depth in writing.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Leaders have an accurate understanding of what needs to be done to improve outcomes for the pupils.  Governors have a good understanding of the school’s priorities. Since a review of governance, they work more effectively.  Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are well supported by teaching assistants.  Pupils are well-behaved and follow classroom routines. They talk politely and courteously to adults and to each other.  Leaders place high importance on pupils’ personal development and welfare. As a result, pupils enjoy going to school and feel safe when they are there.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of leadership and management by ensuring that: – leaders accurately monitor the impact of new initiatives with a sense of urgency to ensure that they are improving pupils’ outcomes and progress – the quality of teaching is consistently strong across all year groups – teaching across the early years is consistently strong.  Improve pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics so that the outcomes at the end of all key stages are closer to the national average by: – improving the accuracy of termly assessments to ensure that teachers plan effectively for challenge – ensuring that teachers set high expectations for pupils, particularly the most able.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Since the previous inspection, leaders have clearly identified the priorities for the school and have implemented change. However, the speed of this change has not been rapid enough. They have introduced a new way of teaching phonics which is systematic and well structured. It is being taught well in Reception and Year 1, yet the impact on results is yet to be seen.  Leaders have not brought about improvements in teaching, learning and assessment quickly enough to ensure that attainment at the end of each key stage is close to the national average. Nonetheless, recently introduced initiatives in writing and the introduction of more problem-solving in mathematics have led to stronger progress in books. This is more evident in Years 5 and 6.  Of the parents who responded to the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View, almost all would recommend the school to other parents and feel that their child is safe. One

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

parent said: ‘Queen’s Park Academy is a school which nurtures and educates children of all ages and abilities.’ Another parent said: ‘My daughter is really happy at Queen’s Park Academy and she is very keen to go to school every day.’  Leaders place high emphasis on pupil welfare, and their pastoral care is good. They have effective systems in place to support pupils with complex difficulties, both with their learning and with daily school life. They prepare pupils well for living in a multicultural United Kingdom.  Staff at the school say that they are well supported by senior leaders and that they are encouraged to develop their skills through attending training.  Leaders have used the grant for disadvantaged pupils to create intervention groups and offer enrichment activities. In Years 1 and 2, this has resulted in disadvantaged pupils outperforming other pupils in the phonics screening check and the key stage 1

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

assessments.  Pupils in Years 2 and 4 who read to the inspectors did so with confidence but with varying degrees of fluency. Books were not always matched accurately to their reading levels.  Where leaders have identified weak teaching, they have been quick to act and have put support plans in place. For some teachers, these plans have been effective, and the quality of their teaching is beginning to improve. For others, there has been no change. This has resulted in reduced progress for the pupils in these classes.  Leaders make good use of the extra money they receive to increase sports provision. They have introduced a morning run/walk for pupils, parents, staff and governors. They have employed a sports technician who runs a wide range of extra-curricular sports, including athletics, dodgeball, curling, football and netball. Ten pupils with SEND attended the inclusion games, which improved their self-confidence.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding is strengthened through celebration of other religions and cultures, visits out of school, sports events and visitors coming into school. Leaders understand the importance of this aspect of the curriculum and actively promote it.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Since the previous inspection, there has been a review of governance, which has resulted in a smaller and more streamlined governing body. Governors’ skills are now well matched to the areas that they monitor and, as a result, they are in a stronger position to hold leaders to account.  Governors understand the school’s priorities. Progress towards set targets is well documented in the headteacher’s reports to governors. Governors contribute to the culture of safeguarding and make regular checks on the systems in place for ensuring that adults are suitable to work in the school.  Governors are effective at holding leaders to account for their spending of the extra money for disadvantaged pupils and the sport premium that the school receives.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders have created a good culture for keeping children safe, and this is valued by pupils and parents. All staff receive the required training for keeping pupils safe. The relevant checks to ensure that all adults are suitable to work with children are carried out systematically.  Any concerns are dealt with effectively by the schools’ early intervention officer, who has developed strong relationships in the local community. This is highlighted by the fact that all pupils receive a home visit from leaders when they join the school.  Staff and pupils who completed the online survey agree that safeguarding is effective Pupils who spoke with inspectors said that they feel safe in school and any concerns are dealt with swiftly.  Leaders are quick to seek extra help from other agencies, such as social services, when a pupil or their family needs it. They hold outside agencies to account for dealing with

p.4

Safeguarding

concerns satisfactorily and in a timely manner.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 Teaching, learning and assessment are not consistently strong across the school. Where teaching is strong, there are high expectations for all groups of pupils and, as a result, they make strong progress. Where teaching is not yet strong enough, groups of learners are not challenged sufficiently and expectations are low. The progress of these pupils is limited.  Teachers have a good relationship with their pupils and, where teaching is strongest, pupils are comfortable in answering questions and challenging the teacher and each other. One group of year 5 boys collaborated well in an English lesson to work out what ‘primarily’ meant.  Work in pupils’ mathematics books shows that, for some year groups, progress over time is good. However, some teachers are focusing on arithmetic and fluency and not moving pupils to problem-solving and reasoning quickly enough. There is more problem-solving in the Year 5 and 6 books, resulting in some pupils working at the

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

higher standards.  In topic and science books, there is a good level of challenge for the lower- and middle-ability groups, but there is less evidence of high expectations of the most able pupils. Work is often the same for all ability groups. The school’s marking and feedback policy is applied inconsistently.  Following the introduction of a new scheme, phonics is taught well in Reception and Year 1. Adults who teach the sessions are well trained, and they teach with enthusiasm and good subject knowledge. The sessions move smoothly from sounds to words to sentences, and pupils have the opportunity to read and write during the session. Pupils are able to develop their understanding through reinforcement and repetition.  Pupils with SEND are well supported in lessons by skilful teaching assistants who know the children well and know how to challenge them through questioning.

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Leaders have created an environment in which pupils feel safe and well cared for.  Leaders arrange trips and visits regularly, and these are valued by the pupils. Year 6 pupils enjoyed their trip to the leisure centre following their key stage 2 tests. Year 2 pupils spoke passionately about their trip to Stanwick Lakes and the children in Reception had a great time at the forest centre.  Pupils are very aware of what it is like to live in modern Britain and they show respect for pupils from different backgrounds and religions. They contribute well to their local community through litter-picking and fundraising.  Pupils have a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe when using computers, and they understand the potential dangers. The pupils say that leaders have introduced robust systems to ensure that they are safe when using the school

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good. Leaders and teachers have good systems in place to ensure that learning is calm and well managed. Pupils are polite and courteous, and they talk articulately to adults and to each other. There is a strong sense that pupils care for each other, and they reported that there is very little unkindness. They say that bullying is very rare and, when it does happen, it is swiftly and effectively dealt with by adults. This is reflected in the records that leaders keep and inspection evidence.  Attendance is below the national average, but leaders are working with parents and religious leaders to improve it. The introduction of an attendance officer has increased the rigour of the challenge to parents. This has resulted in a significant drop in persistent absence and a modest increase in attendance. Leaders have developed a sophisticated computer program to track attendance and alert leaders to patterns of

p.5

Behaviour

absence, allowing them to involve parents sooner.  Pupils play together well at breaktimes and lunchtimes and make good use of the facilities and resources on offer. During wet breaktimes, pupils were well-behaved in classrooms. When they needed to move around the school, they did so in a calm manner.  Pupils take a pride in their work, and books are well kept and well presented.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils’ attainment in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of key stage 2 was below the national average in 2018, and very few pupils reached the higher standards in reading and mathematics or greater depth in writing. The proportion of pupils reaching the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined has been well below the national average for three years.  At the end of key stage 1, pupils’ attainment in reading, writing and mathematics was well below the national average in 2018.  Progress for all groups of pupils in reading and writing was below the national average in 2018, but pupils made average progress in mathematics. There was an improvement in the progress pupils made from key stage 1 to 2 in writing from 2017 to 2018.  Over the last three years, the proportion of Year 1 pupils who reached the expected standard in the phonics screening check has been below the national average. Leaders

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

have introduced a new way of teaching phonics, but its impact has yet to be seen.  Disadvantaged pupils in Year 1 performed better in the phonics screening check in 2018 than other pupils as a result of a targeted intervention. This was the same for disadvantaged pupils in Year 2 when they took their reading, writing and mathematics assessments.  Pupils with SEND are well supported by teaching assistants, and work is well matched to their abilities. Work in books shows that they are making good progress over time.

p.6

Early years provision Requires improvement

 The early years area is welcoming and vibrant. Although it is situated with Year 1 in a different building from the rest of the school, leaders ensure that they visit the site regularly.  Children are curious, well-behaved and respond well to adults. They are able to focus on tasks for sustained periods. Many are able to work independently on self-chosen activities.  Many children join early years with knowledge and skills below those typical for their age. Some have very little, or no, English language. The proportion of children who reach a good level of development at the end of Reception is below the national average.  All children receive a home visit when they join the school, which leads to good relationships with families. As a result, there is always good attendance at school open mornings and other events. Leaders have worked hard to involve parents in their children’s learning.  Leaders have identified weak areas in early years and have written an action plan to

p.6

Early years provision Requires improvement

make the necessary improvements. Parts of the plan have already been implemented, and they are beginning to improve standards, particularly in reading.  Since leaders introduced a new way of teaching phonics, there has been some improvement in children’s language development, particularly in those children new to learning English. Teachers and teaching assistants deliver sessions in a systematic and engaging way. As a result, children are improving in their ability to read and spell.  Leaders use the indoor and outdoor areas well and offer a wide range of activities to engage the children. Additional adults are used well, and they support the children well through effective questioning.  Work in books for children in the Nursery show that they make good progress from their various starting points but, for children in Reception, particularly the most able, this progress is not strong enough for them to exceed expectations.

p.7

Early years provision Requires improvement

 Leaders ensure that the early years welfare requirements are met.

p.7

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.8

School details

Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected

p.8

Information about this school

 The school converted to a stand-alone academy in 2012.  Queen’s Park Academy is a larger-than-average primary school situated on a split site. Early years and pupils in Year 1 share the Marlborough Road site. Pupils in Years 2 to 6 are taught on the Chestnut Avenue site.  There is a higher proportion of pupils with education, health and care plans than in other schools nationally.  Most pupils are from Asian backgrounds; the largest groups are of Pakistani and Bangladeshi heritage. Most pupils have English as an additional language.  The number of disadvantaged pupils is above the national average.  There are more girls on roll than boys.

p.8

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors observed teaching and learning in most classes, and were joined by senior leaders for some of these observations.  The responses of 31 parents who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, were taken into account.  Inspectors looked through a range of books across most year groups and in all subjects.  Inspector met with leaders, governors, parents and teachers. Inspectors looked at the school’s review of its own performance, its development plan, a number of key school policies and the minutes of governing body. They considered a range of documentation in relation to child protection, safeguarding, behaviour and attendance.  Inspectors met with groups of pupils, observed them at playtimes and lunchtimes and listened to them read their books.  Responses from 115 pupils and 39 staff who completed Ofsted’s online questionnaires were considered.

p.9

Inspection team

Nick Templeton, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.9

Inspection team

John Constable Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.10

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.10

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.10

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion