Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Kippax Greenfield Primary School
Summary
Michele Costello (lead), Louise Greatrex
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Jun 2019
- Inspectors verified
Louise Greatrex, Michele Costello
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
LS25 7PA
- Name on report verified
Kippax Greenfield Primary School
- URN verified
143241
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Expectations of what pupils can achieve are sometimes too low and work lacks challenge. p.1
- As a result, pupils do not make good progress and too few pupils reach the expected and higher standards of attainment by the end of Year 6. p.1
- Leaders ensure that all staff are well trained to spot the signs that may indicate that a child is a risk of harm. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- Until recently, leaders, governors, and the trust have not tackled weaknesses in the quality of teaching, learning and pupils’ outcomes quickly enough. p.3
- Teachers’ assessment of pupils’ work has not been accurate. p.3
- Governors did not challenge leaders effectively when pupils’ outcomes and the quality of education began to decline. p.3
- In recent years there has been turbulence in staffing. p.3
- This has led to instability, contributing to the decline in the quality of education. p.3
- Since September 2018, the trust has taken effective action to improve the quality of teaching and pupils’ outcomes. p.3
- The trust has created additional capacity within the senior leadership team to support the school to improve, for instance support from a national leader of education and the trust’s primary school improvement partner. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance33
“Leaders have created an ethos where pupils are considerate, polite and respectful of others.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,770
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Kippax Greenfield Primary School Ebor Mount, Kippax, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS25 7PA
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Until this academic year, leaders and the trust have not taken effective action to address the decline in pupils’ outcomes, particularly in reading and mathematics in key stage 2. Expectations of what pupils can achieve are sometimes too low and work lacks challenge. As a result, pupils do not make good progress and too few pupils reach the expected and higher standards of attainment by the end of Year 6. There are limited opportunities for pupils to practise their numeracy and literacy skills in subjects other than English and mathematics. Pupils have insufficient opportunities to deepen their knowledge and revisit learning in subjects beyond English and mathematics. Some leaders are new to their posts. Their role in monitoring the quality of teaching is not fully developed. Teachers do not consistently insist on high standards of pupils’ presentation and handwriting. Consequently, pupils’ presentation
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
and handwriting are variable in quality. Leaders and governors understand the main priorities for improvement. However, improvement plans do not include clear measurable steps to judge the effect of actions taken to improve standards. Governors check the effect of actions leaders have taken to improve the school. However, they have an overgenerous view of the effectiveness of some of these actions.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The trust is taking robust action to improve the aspects of the school that have declined. High-quality staff training is improving the quality of teaching across the school. Pupils demonstrate positive attitudes towards their learning and behave well. Most pupils enjoy school and attend regularly. Children in Reception make good progress as a result of effective teaching, learning and assessment.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment so that all pupils make good progress in their learning across the curriculum by: – making sure that all staff have equally high expectations of what pupils can achieve – ensuring that learning is challenging for all pupils, so that a greater proportion of pupils achieve the expected and higher standards of attainment – further reducing gaps in pupils’ learning caused by previously weaker teaching – making sure that there is a consistent approach to the teaching of spelling, including developing pupils’ understanding of subject-specific vocabulary – providing more opportunities for pupils to practise their literacy and numeracy skills across the curriculum – further developing pupils’ mathematical problem-solving and reasoning skills – ensuring that teachers insist on high standards of presentation and build on the work to improve pupils’ handwriting
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
– further improving the outdoor area in Reception so that it complements the rich learning environment found indoors. Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: – developing further the skills of new leaders so that they are able to monitor the quality of teaching, learning and assessment more effectively – strengthen improvement plans to incorporate clear interim milestones to judge the effect of actions taken to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, so that governors can hold leaders more robustly to account – ensuring that in all subjects, curriculum plans consider the sequencing and progression of pupils’ knowledge, understanding and skills, so pupils have more opportunities to revisit, deepen and build on their prior learning, and understand the links between subjects. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Until recently, leaders, governors, and the trust have not tackled weaknesses in the quality of teaching, learning and pupils’ outcomes quickly enough. Teachers’ assessment of pupils’ work has not been accurate. Governors did not challenge leaders effectively when pupils’ outcomes and the quality of education began to decline. In recent years there has been turbulence in staffing. This has led to instability, contributing to the decline in the quality of education. Staffing is now more stable. Since September 2018, the trust has taken effective action to improve the quality of teaching and pupils’ outcomes. The trust has created additional capacity within the senior leadership team to support the school to improve, for instance support from a national leader of education and the trust’s primary school improvement partner. Actions such as these have stemmed the decline in the quality of education.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
The school development plan identifies the main priorities for improvement. Staff understand these priorities. However, there are very few interim milestones within the plan for leaders and governors to judge the effect of actions to improve the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress. Staff feel well supported by leaders. They talk positively about the training they have received this academic year to improve their practice. High-quality professional development is improving the quality of teaching, particularly the teaching of reading and mathematics. Leaders have created an ethos where pupils are considerate, polite and respectful of others. The school motto, ‘respect for ourselves, respect for each other and the environment’, permeates all aspects of school life. Most pupils who inspectors spoke to are knowledgeable about British values. They learn about different religions. However, some pupils find it difficult to remember what they had learned about different
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
religions and British values because there are not enough opportunities for pupils to revisit prior learning. Leaders have recently reviewed the wider curriculum. Consequently, a new curriculum was introduced in September 2018, with the aim of enhancing pupils’ understanding of the world around them. However, there are missed opportunities in subjects such a history and geography for pupils to deepen their learning and revisit prior learning. Other than in English and mathematics, pupils have limited recall of the subjects they had studied. In some year groups, too much time is spent on English and mathematics at the expense of other subjects. Curriculum plans in subjects beyond English and mathematics do not identify clearly the progression of pupils’ knowledge, understanding and skills and the sequencing of learning. New leaders are beginning to lead improvements with support from trust leaders.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
However, they are not effectively evaluating the impact of their work to improve the quality of teaching. Pupils, parents and carers, who made their views known to inspectors, talk positively about the range of enrichment opportunities, including trips, visits and sporting activities. These activities enhance the taught curriculum. The vast majority of parents who responded to the Ofsted parent survey, Parent View, would recommend the school. Many parents expressed that the school is ‘caring, warm and inclusive’. However, some parents expressed concerns about the decline in the quality of education in recent years. Not all parents who responded to the Ofsted survey believe that the school deals effectively with bullying.
p.3
Governance of the school
Until recently, governors have not challenged leaders effectively to address the decline in the quality of education. Governors have accepted school leaders’ views of the school too readily. The board of trustees now provides increased levels of support and challenge to the governing body. Governors are committed and dedicated to improving the school. They visit the school regularly to check the effect of leaders’ work. Governors understand the school’s strengths and weaknesses. For example, they know that the progress made by pupils in Year 6, particularly in reading and mathematics, has not been good enough in the past. Governors now challenge leaders more effectively. However, they still have an overgenerous view of the effect of leaders’ actions to improve the quality of teaching. Governors ensure that funding to support disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and disability (SEND) is used effectively.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders ensure that all staff are well trained to spot the signs that may indicate that a child is a risk of harm. For example, they understand the dangers of county lines gangs and child criminal exploitation. Staff are clear about whistleblowing procedures. Staff can articulate how they log and follow up any safeguarding concerns. Pupils told inspectors that they can talk to the ‘safeguarding team’ if they have any worries or concerns. Pupils, who made their views known to inspectors, feel safe in school. Pupils understand how to stay safe online. They also learn through personal, social, health and citizenship lessons how to keep themselves safe outside of school. For instance, they learn about healthy relationships, mental health and first aid. Leaders carry out the necessary checks to ensure that staff are safe to work with children. One amendment was made to the single central record, which record the
p.4
Safeguarding
checks made on staff, during the inspection. A number of staff are paediatric first-aid trained. Leaders ensure that this training is kept up to date.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Historically weaker teaching has led to gaps in pupils’ knowledge, understanding and skills across the curriculum. In the past, leaders have not taken effective action to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment. Action taken by school leaders since September 2018 is improving the quality of teaching. However, the quality of teaching remains variable across subjects and year groups and requires improvement. When teachers ensure that learning is challenging, pupils rise to the challenge. Pupils enjoy grappling with their learning. However, not all staff have equally high expectations of what pupils can achieve. Expectations are sometimes too low and so pupils find the work too easy. Inspectors observed some pupils completing activities quickly, with no further work to move onto. Training for staff this year has focused on improving the quality of teaching, particularly in reading and mathematics. Pupils are developing increasing fluency in
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
mathematics. Teachers are developing pupils’ comprehension and inference skills in reading more effectively across year groups. Pupils now access more challenging whole class-texts. There is a growing culture of reading. However, there is not a consistent approach to developing pupils’ subject- specific vocabulary and correct spelling of subject-specific words. In mathematics lessons, sometimes, teachers miss opportunities to develop pupils’ mathematical problem-solving and reasoning skills. There are limited opportunities for pupils to practise their literacy and numeracy skills in other subjects, such as history, geography and technology. Inspectors scrutinised pupils’ books across the wider curriculum and spoke to pupils about their learning. Inspectors found that pupils have limited opportunities to revisit and deepen their learning and build on prior knowledge in subjects beyond English and
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
mathematics. Pupils’ presentation is variable across year groups and subjects because staff do not have consistently high expectations of what pupils can achieve. Recent work to improve pupils’ handwriting is showing some effect. Spelling errors are not addressed effectively by some teachers. As a result, some pupils repeat the same spelling errors. Positive relationships exist between staff and pupils. Pupils are confident to take risks and learn from their mistakes. They are interested in their learning. For example, pupils told inspectors that they enjoy taking part in experiments in science lessons. The teaching of phonics is effective and systematic. Teachers and teaching assistants follow a similar structure for each phonics session. Reading books are well matched to pupils’ phonics understanding. Pupils have the opportunity to re-read books to develop their fluency. Pupils with SEND are well supported by teaching assistants. When planning learning,
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
staff consider these pupils’ individual needs and starting points. Effective intervention is put in place when required. Parents, who made their views known to inspectors, spoke positively about the individualised support provided to their child.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils told inspectors that bullying is rare. They understand the different types of bullying. Pupils told inspectors that they do not hear the use of inappropriate language such as homophobic and racist language in school. The school has achieved the UNICEF Level 1 Rights Respecting School Award. Leaders place high importance on developing pupils’ respectful and tolerant attitudes. As a result, pupils show respect and tolerance of difference. Pupils are self-assured. Most pupils contribute well to discussions and are confident to share their views. They respect each other’s opinions. The curriculum contributes well to the development of pupils’ spiritual, moral and cultural understanding. For instance, during the inspection children were discussing what equality means during an assembly. In Year 6, pupils discussed gender
p.5
Personal development and welfare
stereotyping. Pupils have the opportunity to join the school council and become school health ambassadors. Opportunities such as these enable pupils to develop their confidence and leadership skills.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils demonstrate positive attitudes towards their learning. They are confident to express their views. They help and support each other during lessons. Pupils conduct themselves well around the school, including at breaktimes and lunchtimes. They follow the instructions of staff. For example, inspectors witnessed pupils very promptly following staff instructions at the end of breaktime. There have been no exclusions in the last five years. Pupils and staff say that the vast majority of pupils behave well. The school’s behaviour logs validate this. The pupils who made their views known to inspectors are proud of their school. They look after the school environment. Pupils’ attendance is above the national average. The proportion of pupils who are regularly absent from school is below the national average. Pupils understand the importance of attending school regularly and being punctual.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Over time, the proportion of pupils attaining the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics combined by the end of key stage 2 has declined and, in 2018, was considerably below the national average. The progress made through key stage 2 in reading and mathematics by Year 6 in 2018 also declined and was well below average. This limited how well some pupils were prepared for secondary school. Work in pupils’ books shows that since September 2018, key stage 2 pupils are making better progress in reading, writing and mathematics. This is due to improving teaching. A higher proportion of pupils are attaining the expected and higher standards in reading, writing and mathematics. However, due to weaker teaching in the past, there are still gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding. Historically, pupils have made better progress in key stage 1. Although pupils’ attainment by the end of key stage 1 has been variable over time, it has not been
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
significantly different from the national average. Current pupils in key stage 1 are making good progress in English and mathematics. However, their progress across the wider curriculum remains variable. Pupils’ recall of the topics they have studied in subjects such as history is limited. Until recently, teacher assessments have not been accurate, particularly in mathematics. As a result, leaders have introduced more effective systems this year to check the progress made by pupils from their different starting points. Moderation of pupils’ work in English and mathematics across the trust is ensuring that current teacher assessment is much more accurate. Disadvantaged pupils are well supported. Their individual barriers to learning are identified and funding to support these pupils is well utilised. Trends in disadvantaged pupils’ progress and attainment over time, and comparisons to national averages, are
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
not meaningful due to the very small numbers of disadvantaged pupils in each year group. Pupils with SEND make good progress in key stage 1. However, their progress is more variable in key stage 2. In 2017 and 2018, a higher proportion of pupils in Year 1 passed the phonics screening check compared to the national average. This is because of effective phonics teaching.
p.7
Early years provision Good
In 2017 and 2018, a higher proportion of children achieved a good level of development by the end of Reception compared to the national average. As a result, children are well prepared for the demands of the Year 1 curriculum. Effective communication ensures that parents are well informed and regularly updated about their child’s progress. Parents of children in Reception, who made their views known to inspectors, are overwhelmingly positive about early years provision and the caring ethos. Children develop positive attitudes towards their learning from an early age. Good manners and the importance of being kind to one another are reinforced consistently by staff. Well-established routines ensure that children are engaged in their learning. Behaviour is generally good in Reception and there is an orderly environment. The indoors area is text and print-rich, promoting mark-making. A range of
p.7
Early years provision Good
opportunities are provided for children to develop their written skills. As a result, children are keen to write. However, at times, boys’ progress in writing is not as strong as girls. Leaders ensure that there are no breaches of the early years welfare requirements. The outdoors area in Reception is not as abundant in opportunities for children to develop their literacy and numeracy skills as found indoors.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Email address kgpsoffice@brigshawtrust.com
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection Not previously inspected
p.8
Information about this school
Kippax Greenfield Primary School converted to become an academy school in September 2016. When its predecessor school was last inspected by Ofsted it was judged to be good overall. The school is part of the Brigshaw Learning Partnership, a multi-academy trust. Responsibility for the school rests with the board of trustees. The structure of the trust’s governance and management can be found on the trust’s website. The school is a smaller than average-sized primary school. The vast majority of pupils are White British. The proportion of pupils who are disadvantaged is below the national average. The proportion of pupils who have an education, health and care plan is below the national average.
p.8
Information about this inspection
Inspectors visited a number of lessons in all year groups. Some lesson visits were carried out jointly with members of the senior leadership team. Inspectors spoke to pupils informally during breaktimes and lunchtimes. Inspectors also met formally with pupils in Years 3, 4, 5 and 6. An inspector listened to some pupils in Years 1, 2 and 6 read. An inspector held a telephone conversation with a parent. Inspectors talked to parents at the start and end of the school day as they were picking up and dropping off their children. Inspectors spoke to a number of staff during the inspection. Inspectors scrutinised pupils’ work with leaders. An inspector met with two governors, including the chair of the governing body. An inspector also met with four members of the board of trustees, including the chair of the board to trustees. A number of meetings were held with the trust’s chief executive officer and primary
p.9
Information about this inspection
school improvement partner. Inspectors scrutinised a wide range of documentation relating to the school’s work, including the self-evaluation document, the school improvement plan, external reviews, information about current pupils’ progress and attainment, minutes of governing body meetings and documents relating to safeguarding, behaviour, welfare and attendance. Inspectors took account of the 69 responses to the online survey, Parent View, including the free-text responses. They analysed the 11 responses to the staff survey. Inspectors also considered written communication from a parent.
p.9
Inspection team
Michele Costello, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.9
Inspection team
Louise Greatrex Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.10
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.10
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion