Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Hampshire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
21 May 2019
- Inspectors verified
Loraine Wardlaw
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY281466
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
6% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder does not identify weaknesses in her practice effectively. p.1
- On occasions, the supervision and safety of children during garden play are not given high enough priority. p.1
- Overall, teaching is not consistently good. p.1
- The childminder has an unclear understanding of the learning and development requirements. p.1
- Therefore, children's learning priorities and the childminder's interactions do not consistently match children's learning needs. p.1
- The progress check for two-year-old children does not meet the requirements. p.1
- It does not provide parents with an overview of children's progress in the prime areas of their development. p.1
- They enjoy healthy meals and active play in the garden, and have regular naps, which supports their good health. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes10
“Outcomes for children Requires improvement” p.1Teaching & assessment8
“Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement” p.1Communication & language4
“Parents report of clear and regular communication with the childminder.” p.1Leadership & governance2
“Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 732
- about usual (typical 743)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date 21 May 2019 Previous inspection date 11 July 2016
p.1
3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
3
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This is a provision that requires improvement
n The childminder does not identify weaknesses in her practice effectively. On occasions, the supervision and safety of children during garden play are not given high enough priority. n Overall, teaching is not consistently good. The childminder has an unclear understanding of the learning and development requirements. Therefore, children's learning priorities and the childminder's interactions do not consistently match children's learning needs. n The progress check for two-year-old children does not meet the requirements. It does not provide parents with an overview of children's progress in the prime areas of their development.
p.1
It has the following strengths
n Children are happy and well cared for. They enjoy healthy meals and active play in the garden, and have regular naps, which supports their good health. n Support for children's mathematics skills is strong. For example, the childminder role models mathematical vocabulary, such as 'full' and 'empty', and encourages children to count and learn shapes. n Partnerships with parents are good. Parents report of clear and regular communication with the childminder. They are pleased with the reliable and flexible childminding service.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date improve safety in the garden, specifically supervising children closely when they take risks 31/05/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
improve the quality of teaching, specifically children's learning priorities, planning and levels of challenge, to help children make good progress in all areas of learning 28/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
improve knowledge of the required progress check at two years and provide parents and/or carers with a short written summary of their child's progress in the prime areas of development. 28/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n use effective evaluation methods to identify and address any weaknesses, to improve the overall quality of practice.
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n The inspector observed children's play and learning activities inside and outside, and talked to children. n The inspector carried out a joint observation/discussion with the childminder. n The inspector held a leadership and management discussion with the childminder and looked at relevant documentation. n The inspector read feedback from parents and took account of their views.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management requires improvement
Since the last inspection there has been a decline in the childminder's practice. Her self- evaluation and improvement strategies are not successful in making sure that all requirements are met. However, these breaches of requirements do not have a significant impact on children. Safeguarding is effective. The childminder demonstrates a strong understanding of child protection issues. In this area of her work she has kept her knowledge up to date. She shows a clear understanding of what to do if she is worried about a child. The childminder liaises with other settings children attend to share information about their needs.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The childminder's teaching varies greatly. Children play happily with the resources available and the childminder supports them generally well. She interacts with children to promote some progress, such as talking, singing songs and sharing a book together. Although the childminder observes children to assess their abilities, these observations are not precise enough. Children's learning priorities do not build on what they already know and can do. The learning environment is not well prepared to fully support children's effective progress in all areas of learning. The childminder lacks an understanding of what is required for the progress check for two-year-old children.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare require improvement
Children's welfare is not fully supported because the childminder does not always supervise them closely when they are playing in the garden. For example, when young children climbed up the large slide independently, the childminder was indoors finding shoes for older children. Children are building relationships with their friends, who they relate to in play. They behave well. Children are starting to learn the safety rules, although the childminder's teaching lacks consistency to fully develop their understanding. The childminder follows effective hygiene routines, such as hand washing at mealtimes.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
Children make steady progress in their learning and develop some skills in readiness for school. They show motivation and suitable levels of curiosity to explore their play environment. For example, digging in the sand or completing a puzzle. However, the teaching and planned activities lack good challenge and extension in some areas of learning to ensure all groups of children, including funded children, make the best possible progress.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY281466 Local authority Hampshire Inspection number 10073354 Type of provision Childminder
p.4
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 1 - 12 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 12 Date of previous inspection 11 July 2016
p.4
Registers
The childminder registered in 2014 and lives in Liphook, Hampshire. She operates each weekday, with the exception of Thursdays, from 7.30am to 6pm. The childminder receives funding to provide free early education for children aged four years. She holds a level 3 qualification in early years education.
p.4
Registers
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Registers
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Registers
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Registers
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.5
Registers
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.5
Registers
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion