Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Lancashire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
3 Jun 2019
- Inspectors verified
Tricia Graham
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
EY410851
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- She has failed to identify serious weaknesses, including those relating to child protection, which put children at risk. p.4
- These weaknesses are further compounded by poor management of her provision. p.4
- Outcomes for children are not consistently good due to some gaps in the educational programmes. p.1
- The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. p.4
- The weaknesses in leadership and management mean that children's welfare is not assured. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This inspection was carried out following our risk assessment process. p.2
- The inspector evaluated an activity with the childminder. p.2
- The inspector held discussions with the childminder, her co-childminder and children at appropriate times during the inspection. p.2
- The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the impact this has on children's learning. p.2
- The inspector examined the child protection policies. p.2
- The inspector checked all areas of the premises used by children. p.2
- The childminder has placed some emphasis on supporting children's learning. p.4
- She has achieved a level 5 qualification in early years and has used her knowledge to improve the quality of teaching. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Records & policies8
“Safeguarding procedures are weak.” p.1Teaching & assessment5
“However, aspects of teaching are strong.” p.4Leadership & governance3
“These weaknesses are further compounded by poor management of her provision.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 938
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date 3 June 2019 Previous inspection date 8 April 2016
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Good 2 Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision is inadequate
n The quality of practice has declined since the previous inspection. As a result, children's health, safety and well-being are not assured. Safeguarding procedures are weak. The childminder has failed to implement her child protection policies, for example, by not sharing concerns with relevant agencies. n The procedures for administering medication are too lax, which compromises children's health. The childminder does not consistently seek written consent from parents before medication is administered to their children. n The childminder does not reinforce effectively the importance of healthy eating to help children learn about good food choices. For example, children are allowed to eat big bags of chocolate during breakfast-time periods. n The childminder does not maintain the required documents to ensure the safe and efficient management of her provision. Records, such as the progress check for two-
p.1
This provision is inadequate
year-olds and information about who has parental responsibility, are not available. n Outcomes for children are not consistently good due to some gaps in the educational programmes. Children have limited opportunities to learn about technology. For example, most of the electronic resources available to children have no batteries, which means children quickly lose interest.
p.1
It has the following strengths
n The childminder helps children gain useful and relevant skills in literacy. For example, she uses innovative techniques to help children hold their pencils. Children's pencil control is developing well. They practise their writing and colouring skills with proficiency and control.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date ensure snacks are consistently healthy, balanced and nutritious 17/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
make sure the required progress checks for children aged between two and three years are accessible and readily available for inspection 17/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
seek and record information about any person who has parental responsibility for minded children 17/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure safeguarding policies are rigorously implemented and this must include the procedures to follow in the event of a child protection concern 17/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
ensure medicine is only administered where written permission for that particular medicine has been obtained from the child's parent or carer. 17/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n ignite children's interest in technology, for example, by ensuring that battery-operated resources are in good working order n ensure four-year-olds have increased opportunities to learn about shape, space and measure.
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n This inspection was carried out following our risk assessment process. n The inspector evaluated an activity with the childminder. n The inspector held discussions with the childminder, her co-childminder and children at appropriate times during the inspection. n The inspector observed the quality of teaching and the impact this has on children's learning. n The inspector spoke to one parent. n The inspector examined the child protection policies. n The inspector checked all areas of the premises used by children. Inspector Tricia Graham
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The childminder has not made sure that children are safe and secure. She has failed to identify serious weaknesses, including those relating to child protection, which put children at risk. These weaknesses are further compounded by poor management of her provision. For example, the childminder has not ensured that required documents, including important information from parents, are in place. The childminder is extremely nurturing in her approach and she has warm relationships with children. Parents have positive views of the childminder and her co-childminder and say that they are kept up to date with their children's learning.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The childminder has placed some emphasis on supporting children's learning. She has achieved a level 5 qualification in early years and has used her knowledge to improve the quality of teaching. This has worked well for some areas of learning, such as literacy. However, other aspects of learning, such as technology and elements of early mathematics, are not as strong. For example, four-year-olds who are more than capable of learning about different shapes, including three-dimensional shapes, are not given the opportunity. The childminder believes this learning should take place in school. This approach does not help children to make the best possible progress in preparation for school. The childminder has suitable procedures for assessing children's progress. She is also aware of the action to take if she has any concerns about a child's development.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The weaknesses in leadership and management mean that children's welfare is not assured. Children have some opportunities to develop an awareness of healthy lifestyles. For example, they benefit from lots of fresh air and exercise. However, some snacks are not consistently healthy. The childminder and her co-childminder plan a range of activities that help children to gain awareness of the wider world. For example, children recently visited the 'butterfly house' and the local farm as part of their spring theme. They observed calves being born and also learned about nature and changes over time. The childminder and her co-childminder are deployed well and ensure children are supervised at all times.
p.4
Outcomes for children require improvement
Outcomes for children are not consistently good. This weakness is most notable in respect of children's early mathematics and technology skills. However, aspects of teaching are strong. The childminder reads stories with children and truly engages them in the narratives, which they thoroughly enjoy. The childminder uses good language. As a result, children have opportunities to hear the correct pronunciation of tricky words. Children are influenced by the range of books provided. They select the stories independently and use a wide vocabulary as they read and discuss the story about a 'bear hunt'. Children know the rules. They hold the books with care and show consideration to their friends as they share the stories together. Children are very well behaved and display good levels of confidence.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY410851 Local authority Lancashire Inspection number 10108939 Type of provision Childminder
p.5
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 1 - 4 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 6 Date of previous inspection 8 April 2016
p.5
Registers
The childminder registered in 2010 and works in the Accrington area of Lancashire. She operates Monday to Thursday from 7.30am to 5pm, and on Friday from 7.30am to 3pm, all year round, except for bank holidays and family holidays. The childminder works with a co-childminder and an assistant. The childminder provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children. She holds a childcare qualification at level 5.
p.5
Registers
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Registers
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Registers
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Registers
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.6
Registers
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.6
Registers
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion