Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

St. John's School (Seaford)

Inspected 6 Jun 2019 · published 21 Jun 2019 · URN SC050366

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Jun 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joe Davys, Keith Riley, Stephen Collett

  • Helped and protected verified

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BN25 2HU

  • Name on report verified

    St. John’s School (Seaford)

  • URN verified

    SC050366

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2019.

  • OverallGood
  • Helped and protectedGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 46% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositiveeffectiveenjoyeffectivelyimprovedclearmake good progressgood progress
Criticisminadequateconcernsconcerndisrupterrorslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1436w+40
  • What needs to improve74w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,506
about usual (typical 1609)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 43
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 76%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school – St John’s School 1 St. John’s School (Seaford) Firle Road, Seaford, East Sussex BN25 2HU Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

St. John’s School (Seaford) is a non-maintained specialist school that works with children who have complex learning disabilities, including some children who may have difficulties resulting from autism spectrum disorder, Asperger syndrome, pathological demand avoidance syndrome and behavioural, emotional and social difficulties. Currently there are 28 children on the school roll. Of these, 10 are residential. One residential area is currently not in use.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers good

p.1

good

The residential special school provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 5 February 2019

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: inadequate Inspection report for residential special school – St John’s School 2

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Young people enjoy their experience in the residential provision. They form friendships with other young people and build rapport with staff. They develop their social skills as well as their independence skills, such as shopping and cooking. They learn to follow a healthy-eating programme.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Young people enjoy a wide range of activities, such as visiting local places of worship, yoga, swimming and going to the cinema. Young people have access to the school facilities outside of education time. Senior leaders have some plans to improve the site, for example by planting a sensory garden.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Young people are in good health. Staff work with parents to ensure that responsibilities are clear. For example, staff ensure that young people who find some routine appointments difficult, receive regular dental check-ups.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

The effective work done by care staff underpins young peoples’ education. Young people make good progress. Some are above their reading age and one young person is now a published author. Staff see young people’s abilities and not their disabilities. They aim to support young people to achieve their dreams, such as getting a place on a film production course.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff demonstrate a sensitivity to the emotional well-being of the young people. For example, staff wrote a social story for a young person with an attachment to a member of staff, to explain why she was not going to be present due to extended leave. Education staff may support young people on activities during care time so that there is a familiar face, for example when there are staff shortages.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff use bespoke communication methods to talk to young people and get their views. This ranges from communicating with young people who are verbal, to talking with young people who use picture exchange communication systems. Young people are able to communicate with their parents, and others who are important to them, using digital technology.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Young people have targets in their placement plans and are making good progress. Such plans would benefit from having better links with education, health and care plans.

p.2

Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good

Staff encourage young people to think about the wider society. One example was planting 10 trees and commemorating local people who lost their lives during the First World War.

p.2

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Inspection report for residential special school – St John’s School 3 Key staff have addressed fully the previous health and safety concerns. Young people live in a safe residential provision that has regular audits and monitoring to ensure its ongoing safety. Senior leaders have obtained a building control certificate for the loft conversion in one of the homes. Some bedrooms have additional safety features in place, such as protective covers on electrical sockets, to fully safeguard young people. A young person said, ‘I feel safe, as well as I do at home.’

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The care manager has been meticulous in her approach to demonstrate the risk management process around sleeping accommodation. She assesses each young person’s needs, the potential impact of others on that young person and the potential impact of that young person on others. From this information, she makes decisions about which bedrooms and houses young people are accommodated in.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

The designated safeguarding lead uses the new computer software to manage safeguarding concerns effectively. The system enables all staff to record any safeguarding concern, safe in the knowledge that they have been prompted to record all relevant information and that the designated safeguarding lead has been automatically notified. The designated safeguarding lead works with other safeguarding professionals to ensure there is a thorough investigation if necessary, and that clear outcomes are recorded.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Staff are well versed in de-escalation skills to minimise the need for physical intervention. They adopt strategies that enable them to manage young people’s obsessive behaviour effectively, so that young people do not need to resort to challenging behaviour. The key staff who are responsible for positive behaviour support collect statistics and analyse incidents to ensure that there is learning from these. There are worthy goals, for example to eliminate supine restraints from the setting. This aim is currently successful, as there have been no supine restraints since October 2018.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Risk assessments provide a picture of the needs of each young person. Staff understand assessments, and consistently implement the control measures. Staff are aware of the risks in the cyber world. Senior leaders have recently rewritten the policy on social media to make the boundaries clear.

p.3

How well children and young people are helped and protected: good

Key staff adopt safer recruitment practice. This includes observing candidates with young people and assessing applicants’ mental health.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

The senior leadership team took swift and decisive action to address the shortfalls found at the last inspection. None of the young people currently living in the residential provision have been accommodated for more than 295 days and there is no intention to accommodate young people for more than 295 days They produced a strategic plan that they have successfully implemented to bring about the other necessary changes. Inspection report for residential special school – St John’s School 4 The school has been through a period of staff changes and there are several new staff, some of whom have no childcare qualifications or experience. This is balanced by key staff acting as mentors. New staff spoke in the most positive of terms about the support and guidance they receive, including the formal supervision process. The care manager has identified in detail the level 3 training needs. The school is on the

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

right trajectory for all staff to gain the qualification. The care manager has a management qualification and recognises the need to gain further childcare qualifications herself.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Staff are positive about the new management arrangements. Staff said that they feel supported, listened to and well trained to do their role. Morale has improved significantly. Staff said that managers have a visible presence in the homes.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Senior leaders introduced a comprehensive training plan to ensure that staff are knowledgeable about the individual needs of young people. Staff spoke in the highest terms about their training and support. Senior leaders are aware of the need to ensure that training is embedded in practice. For example, carrying out autism specific audits to assess if the environment is ‘low arousal’ for young people with sensory impairment following training in this area.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Senior leaders have reviewed the medication policy in conjunction with a health professional. They ensure that all staff receive accredited training so that young people receive their correct medication at the right time. The school nurse analyses any medication errors and ensures that there is learning from incidents.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Senior leaders review behaviour management records to ensure that they are of a high standard. Staff and young people alike now have a debrief after a significant incident. Key staff analyse each incident to consider the triggers and themes. They consider how to prevent recurrences. There are plans to introduce additional software to aid this task.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Key staff have developed systems for monitoring the approach to statutory reviews. Staff ensure that they are actively chasing the minutes of formal meetings while carrying out the agreed actions. Currently, staff contribute verbally to statutory reviews.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Senior leaders welcome complaints from various sources and view these as a tool to drive forward improvement. Communication with parents is improving. For example, staff agreed a short (two-day) break from residential to disrupt a behaviour pattern for one young person.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

Maintenance staff keep the premises in good condition. They have a rolling refurbishment programme to decorate the young peoples’ areas. Senior leaders recognise that one area is not currently fit for purpose. This is currently closed and out of bounds for all young people. Inspection report for residential special school – St John’s School 5 Governors are closely involved as critical friends of the school, offering senior leaders professional challenge and accountability. They are fully aware of their safeguarding responsibilities and have improved their procedures for holding senior leaders to account. An independent visitor adds another level to the monitoring of the school.

p.4

The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good

There have been no new young people admitted into the school since the last inspection. Inspection report for residential special school – St John’s School 6

p.5

Recommendations

 Provide written reports on the progress of young people for use at statutory reviews.  Consider how to further embed training into practice, such as creating more structure in evening timetables and using bespoke ways to communicate with young people who have autism spectrum disorders.  Use education, health and care plans to inform targets in placement plans.  Consider how to further develop outdoor activities in the garden and on the site.

p.6

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school – St John’s School 7

p.6

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC050366

p.7

Residential special school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Fran Pass

p.7

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential special school

p.7

Residential special school details

Email address: reception.sch@st-johns.co.uk Inspection report for residential special school – St John’s School 8

p.7

Inspectors

Keith Riley, social care inspector (lead) Stephen Collett, social care inspector Joe Davys, social care inspector Inspection report for residential special school – St John’s School 9 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.8

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion