Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Barbara Speake Schools for Performing Arts
Summary
Avtar Sherri (lead), Kanwaljit Singh
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
2 May 2019
- Inspectors verified
Avtar Sherri, Kanwaljit Singh
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
W3 7EG
- Name on report verified
Barbara Speake Stage School
- URN verified
101948
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2017.
- OverallInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Schedule 10 of the Equality Act 2010 is not met. guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . p.10
- Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate p.1
- Consequently, weaknesses are not effectively tackled. p.3
- The proprietor knows about the school’s weaknesses, for example in the academic curriculum, but has not taken effective action to develop this area. p.3
- Leadership has been ineffective over time in bringing about improvements. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school must meet the independent school standards, as set out in the annex of this report. p.2
- Leaders have not been effective in improving the quality of teaching since the previous inspection, particularly in the academic subjects. p.4
- They have not checked the quality of teaching. p.4
- Teachers have received insufficient support to improve their classroom practice. p.4
- Leaders have not improved the systems for checking the progress of pupils since the previous inspection. p.4
- Teachers’ use of assessment information to plan appropriate learning activities for pupils is weak. p.4
- For example, in mathematics in the secondary phase, learning moves on to new concepts too soon, leaving gaps in some pupils’ knowledge. p.4
- Pupils are often not clear how to improve their work. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,562
- shorter than usual (typical 3317)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 46
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Barbara Speake Stage School East Acton Lane, East Acton, London W3 7EG
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leadership has been ineffective over time in bringing about improvements. The proprietor and leaders have not ensured that all the independent school standards are met. The proprietor and leaders have not ensured that the weaknesses from the previous inspection have been fully addressed. Leaders have not ensured that the correct safeguarding procedures are followed. Consequently, safeguarding is ineffective. Leaders do not make sufficient checks on the quality of teaching, learning and assessment to bring about improvements. Teachers do not receive enough training and support to improve their practice. Teachers’ use of assessment to plan learning for pupils is weak, particularly in key stages 1 and 2. Pupils often do not know how to improve their work. The most able pupils are not sufficiently challenged. Leaders do not analyse assessment information effectively to evaluate the progress that pupils
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
make from their different starting points. Pupils’ progress across the school in the academic curriculum is weaker than in the artistic curriculum. Leaders have not ensured that pupils practise and strengthen their mathematical skills across the curriculum.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Pupils’ progress in the artistic curriculum, including dance, drama and arts, is strong. Leaders have made sure that personal development, behaviour and welfare are good. Pupils read well and they read regularly. Pupils enjoy coming to school. Parents and carers who spoke to inspectors are very positive about the school. Very recent changes to the school’s leadership are having a positive impact on school improvement.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The school must take action to meet the requirements of the schedule to The Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 and associated requirements. The details are listed in the full report.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by ensuring that: – the correct safeguarding procedures are followed effectively in the event of any safeguarding and child protection issue and that the designated safeguarding lead urgently updates their training on safeguarding – systems are in place to hold leaders to account for the work they do, including improving pupils’ progress – there is a greater focus on the academic curriculum so that pupils’ outcomes are as strong in academic subjects as in the artistic curriculum. Improve the quality of teaching and learning so that pupils make strong progress in academic subjects by ensuring that: – staff receive regular training and support to improve their practice – leaders routinely check the quality of teaching and learning – pupils’ progress is closely measured and those falling behind are provided with timely and effective support – the most able pupils are sufficiently challenged through work that extends their
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
thinking – assessment information is used effectively to plan appropriate learning activities for pupils, particularly in key stages 1 and 2 – pupils receive effective guidance on how to correct and improve their work – pupils have sufficient opportunities to practise and apply their mathematical knowledge and skills across the curriculum, particularly in the upper school. The school must meet the independent school standards, as set out in the annex of this report.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
The proprietor and senior leaders have not addressed the main areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection. Leaders have not ensured that all the independent school standards are met. Leaders have not ensured that safeguarding procedures are effectively followed when dealing with safeguarding issues. Systems to check the work of senior leaders and hold them to account for bringing about improvements lack rigour. Consequently, weaknesses are not effectively tackled. Leaders do not make routine checks on the quality of teaching and learning. They are not able to provide effective guidance to teachers on how to improve. Overall, leaders do not have a secure understanding of the quality of teaching and learning across the school. There is a lack of support, professional development and training opportunities to help teachers to improve their classroom practice. As a result, the quality of teaching and
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
learning is not good, particularly in academic subjects. The curriculum is broad and engages pupils’ interest. Pupils’ learning is enriched through participation in dance, drama, ballet and musical theatre, and visits to museums and theatres. School performances and plays, including singing, are of high quality. However, there is insufficient time allocated to the academic subjects. The curriculum promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development well. Pupils visit different places of worship and celebrate a range of cultural events, including European day of languages, international day of peace, Chinese New Year and Remembrance Day. Overall, pupils are prepared well for life in modern Britain. The school promotes British values well. Pupils learn about democracy, respect and the rule of law, including through visits to the Houses of Parliament. They sing and take part in performances for hospital patients and for local care home residents.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate
Recent changes to leadership have already made an impact on ensuring that all the relevant policies are up to date and in place. Leaders have reviewed the school’s complaints policy, and put in place clear procedures on how to deal with informal and formal complaints. The complaints policy now meets requirements. The school no longer has provision for children aged four and it appears that the Department for Education has not been notified.
p.3
Governance
The proprietor has very recently appointed a new governing body. The new governors are skilled, experienced and highly committed to bringing about improvements. While they have yet to meet formally with school leaders, they have helpfully produced a draft action plan which highlights the main priorities for the school. Prior to the appointment of the governing body, the proprietor held the responsibility for governance. She has high aspirations for pupils to pursue careers in the performing arts. However, since the previous inspection senior leaders have not been sufficiently challenged and held to account in order to bring about improvements. The proprietor knows about the school’s weaknesses, for example in the academic curriculum, but has not taken effective action to develop this area. The proprietor has not ensured that leaders follow the correct safeguarding procedures when dealing with
p.3
Governance
safeguarding issues. The proprietor is currently overseeing the restructuring of the senior leadership team.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective. The school’s safeguarding policy, which reflects the latest statutory guidance, is published on the school’s website. However, senior leaders have not followed the correct procedures outlined in the school’s safeguarding policy when dealing with safeguarding issues. There is a lack of communication between senior leaders and an insecure understanding of the effective action to take when dealing with safeguarding and child protection issues. The school does not currently have a fully trained designated safeguarding lead. The headteacher and the proprietor have not paid full regard to the current government statutory guidance and requirements on safeguarding. Consequently, safeguarding is ineffective. Other staff have received up-to-date training on the current safeguarding and child protection procedures, including ‘Keeping children safe in education’, September 2018.
p.4
Safeguarding
Pupils are taught how to stay safe, including when online and from extremist views. Leaders carry out routine checks on the safety of the school site to ensure that pupils are kept safe. The headteacher carries out all the necessary pre-employment checks on staff to ensure that they are suitable to work with pupils.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Leaders have not been effective in improving the quality of teaching since the previous inspection, particularly in the academic subjects. They have not checked the quality of teaching. Teachers have received insufficient support to improve their classroom practice. Leaders have not improved the systems for checking the progress of pupils since the previous inspection. Teachers’ use of assessment information to plan appropriate learning activities for pupils is weak. For example, in mathematics in the secondary phase, learning moves on to new concepts too soon, leaving gaps in some pupils’ knowledge. Pupils are often not clear how to improve their work. As a result, errors and misconceptions persist and pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable. Teachers’ expectations of pupils’ work and what they can achieve are not high enough. The learning needs of different ability pupils are frequently not met well. Teachers do not
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
routinely provide most-able pupils with necessary challenge to enable them to fulfil their potential. Pupils have limited opportunities to practise and improve their mathematical skills across the curriculum. Teachers have a secure subject knowledge. Teaching develops and strengthens pupils’ speaking and listening skills. The teaching of phonics is effective. Younger pupils use their knowledge and understanding of phonics well to read difficult or unfamiliar words. Pupils show a love of reading. The quality of teaching in artistic subjects is strong. Teachers are highly knowledgeable and skilful. Teachers’ guidance and expertise helps pupils to make strong progress in showing expression and emotion in their dancing. Pupils collaborate well to help each other improve their work. Pupils enjoy singing and their stage performances are of high quality.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Mutual respect between staff and pupils and among pupils is strong. This enhances pupils’ self-confidence and their enjoyment of coming to school and learning. Pupils are taught how to keep themselves safe in a wide range of situations. They know, for example, how to keep themselves safe online. They understand the dangers associated with cyberbullying, extremist views and radicalisation. In personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education lessons, older pupils discuss and debate knowledgeably the potential risks of using different types of social media. Pupils are taught how to eat healthily and how to lead healthy lifestyles. Physical activities in the artistic curriculum contribute well to their physical well-being. Pupils understand the different forms of that bullying can take. Pupils told inspectors that
p.5
Personal development and welfare
bullying, racism, sexism and homophobia are rare. The school’s own records of behaviour confirm this. Pupils said that if bullying does occur, they are confident that staff will deal with any issues effectively. Pupils said they always feel safe at school. Pupils are respectful towards the cultures and faiths of others and have tolerant attitudes. Older pupils demonstrate a secure understanding of the protected characteristics. Opportunities for pupils to develop their leadership skills through taking up different roles and responsibilities in the school are limited.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils are friendly, polite and courteous. They respond well to the school’s high expectations of their behaviour. Pupils understand the school’s new behaviour policy well, including the school’s rewards and sanctions. They interact well with each other and take responsibility for their own behaviour. Pupils said that behaviour is typically good. Pupils’ conduct in class and around the school is good. Pupils generally take care of the school and there is very little litter. Pupils are punctual and school records show that most attend well.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
Pupils’ progress overall is weaker in the academic curriculum than in the artistic curriculum. This is because teaching in the academic subjects is weaker and insufficient time is allocated to the academic curriculum. Pupils who fall behind are not identified and provided with additional support quickly enough. Current pupils’ work shows that teachers do not routinely take pupils’ starting points into account when setting tasks. Sometimes, teachers’ expectations are not high enough. In 2018, the proportion of pupils who attained at least grade 4 in GCSE English was above average and broadly average at grade 5 and above. In mathematics, the proportion of pupils who attained at least grade 4 in GCSE was below average and well below average at grade 5 and above. At the end of key stage 2 in 2018, the proportion of pupils who reached the expected standard in reading, mathematics and English grammar, punctuation and spelling was in
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
line with the national average. However, a lower-than-average proportion of pupils reached the higher standard in these subjects. The most able pupils are not sufficiently challenged to make the progress of which they are capable to help them achieve higher standards. Younger pupils’ understanding of phonics is secure and this helps them to enjoy and do well in reading. There are limited opportunities for pupils to practise and apply their mathematical knowledge and skills across different subjects. Pupils’ speaking and listening skills are promoted well. Pupils’ writing improves because they regularly write at length and for different purposes. The artistic curriculum is particularly strong in building pupils’ self-esteem and confidence. In 2018, pupils’ outcomes in modern, tap, ballet and musical theatre were strong. Pupils are provided with appropriate careers advice and guidance. Pupils typically make
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
strong progress in the artistic subjects. They leave the school well prepared for higher educational college auditions and careers in the performing arts, to which they aspire.
p.6
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.
p.7
School details
Email address enquiries@barbaraspeake.com
p.7
School details
Date of previous inspection 7 to 9 November 2017
p.7
Information about this school
Barbara Speake Stage School is an independent day school for boys and girls. It specialises in the teaching of the performing arts as part of its artistic curriculum. Pupils learn English, mathematics, science and a humanities subject as part of their academic curriculum. The proprietor has been running classes at the premises since 1945. The school was established in 1963. The school is registered for 140 pupils aged 4 to 16 years. There are currently 71 pupils on roll. There are no children aged four on roll at the school. The school has no separate early years provision and no provision for two-year-olds. The lower junior school consists of a mixed-age class with pupils aged 5 to 7. The upper junior school is a mixed-age key stage 2 class with pupils aged 8 to 11. The senior school consists of individual classes for each year group from Years 7 to 11. The school aims to promote the skills of creativity, education, talent, imagination and
p.7
Information about this school
artistic development. Pupils regularly receive opportunities to work professionally in the performance industry. Pupils work towards the International Dance Teachers Association (IDTA) examinations in four dance disciplines, as well as the London College of Music Examinations (LCM) in singing. There have been recent changes in teaching staff, particularly in the senior leadership team. The school is going through some changes in relation to its leadership structure and staff recruitment. There is a new and very recently appointed governing body. The school does not use any alternative provision. The school has no religious affiliation. The school was last inspected in November 2017, when it was judged to be requiring improvement. It received an emergency visit in 11 December 2018 in response to multiple complaints which raised concerns about various aspects of the school’s work. Due to un-
p.8
Information about this school
met independent school standards, the Department for Education (DfE) required the school to produce an action plan to address the unmet standards at the emergency inspection. The action plan was subsequently evaluated on 13 March 2019 and was rejected by the DfE. The DfE requested this inspection to consider the school’s complaint policy and how leaders respond to complaints.
p.8
Information about this inspection
This full standard inspection took place with one day’s notice. The inspectors observed a range of teaching and learning in all classes and year groups. Most of these were joint observations with the headteacher. Work in pupils’ books was reviewed to check their work and progress. Meetings were held with the proprietor, headteacher and school manager. A meeting was also held with two governors, including the chair of the governing body. Inspectors spoke to pupils in all key stages. A meeting was held with staff to discuss professional development, behaviour and safety issues, including safeguarding. A telephone call was made to the local authority designated officer to discuss the school’s referrals and any safeguarding concerns. Inspectors checked the school’s health and safety and welfare arrangements, and toured the premises. All the independent school standards were checked. The inspectors scrutinised the school’s pre-employment checks on staff and looked at
p.9
Information about this inspection
pupils’ attendance and behaviour records. The inspectors also examined the school’s policies and documents in relation to the independent school standards, including information on safety and safeguarding. Inspectors met and spoke with 13 parents in the school playground at the beginning of the school day. The inspection took account of 23 responses to Parent View and two free- text responses. There were no responses to the staff or pupils’ surveys.
p.9
Inspection team
Avtar Sherri, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.9
Part 3. Welfare, health and safety of pupils
7 The standard in this paragraph is met if the proprietor ensures that– – 7(a) arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of pupils at the school; and – 7(b) such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
34(1) The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school– – 34(1)(a) demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently; – 34(1)(b) fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently; and – 34(1)(c) actively promote the well-being of pupils.
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
The correct safeguarding procedure has not been met.
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Schedule 10 of the Equality Act 2010 is not met. guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion