Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)

Aurora Eccles

Inspected 6 Jun 2019 · URN SC027660

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

RI to be good

Ashley Hinson (lead), Brenda McInerney

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    6 Jun 2019

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Ashley Hinson, Brenda McInerney

  • Helped and protected verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement to be good

  • Postcode verified

    NR16 2NZ

  • Name on report verified

    Aurora Eccles School

  • URN verified

    SC027660

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.

  • OverallRI to be good
  • Helped and protectedRI to be good
  • Leadership and managementRI to be good

13% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Requires improvement to be good (12,716 inspections).

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+7Mostly positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement to be good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedpositiveextremelymake good progressstrongambitiousseriousfailures
Criticismrequires improvementconcernsat riskinsufficientnot consistentlyconcernnot yetlimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings918w+10
  • What needs to improve82w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
995
shorter than usual (typical 2096)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 43
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
4
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 65%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

Inspection report for residential special school - Aurora Eccles School 1 Aurora Eccles School Eccles, Norwich, Norfolk NR16 2NZ Residential provision inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this residential special school

Aurora Eccles School is an independent residential special school for pupils aged between four and 19. Residential accommodation is offered to pupils aged eight years and above. There are 146 children on roll, six of whom reside at the school on a weekly or full-time basis and three of whom access the service on an ad hoc basis. The residential accommodation is provided in one building that is split into two houses in the grounds. The school is situated in rural Norfolk, between Norwich and Thetford. The school caters for children who have a specific learning difficulty, and/or social and/or communication difficulties. The residential provision was last inspected in June 2018.

p.1

Overall experiences and progress of

children and young people, taking into account

p.1

good

How well children and young people are helped and protected requires improvement to be good

p.1

good

The effectiveness of leaders and managers requires improvement to be good

p.1

good

The residential special school is not yet delivering good help and care for children and young people. However, there are no serious or widespread failures that result in their welfare not being safeguarded or promoted.

p.1

good

Date of previous inspection: 12 June 2018

p.1

good

Overall judgement at last inspection: requires improvement to be good Inspection report for residential special school - Aurora Eccles School 2

p.1

improvement to be good

The staff and managers have worked hard to address the issues that were identified at the last inspection. As a result, there have been some improvements. However, this inspection identified further shortfalls in response to two safeguarding issues. Consequently, further work is necessary to ensure that children receive good enough help and protection.

p.2

improvement to be good

Children benefit from a wide-ranging and enhanced clinical service. Care, education and clinical staff work well together. Speech and language therapists work in the residential provision several evenings a week and children engage well with them. In addition, a psychologist offers a range of therapeutic work for children.

p.2

improvement to be good

The staff encourage children to develop their independence skills. These skills include using public transport and cooking. One child was extremely proud of her new ability to make a cup of tea. Another child was very pleased with his cooking skills and prepared a meal for nine of his peers.

p.2

improvement to be good

Children make good progress developing their social skills. The school has some limited evidence of children’s progress in education. Managers are in the early stages of implementing a new progress and attainment monitoring system.

p.2

improvement to be good

The use of flexible ad hoc residential stays supports a number of day children with social and independent skills, including some who are at risk of family or placement breakdown. This leads to improvements for these children.

p.2

improvement to be good

A dedicated nurse oversees the medication arrangements. Strong systems are in place to ensure that staff are skilled in administering medication effectively and safely.

p.2

improvement to be good

The quality and appearance of the residential provision has improved considerably. The staff involved the children in the redecoration.

p.2

improvement to be good

Children said that they enjoy the activities on offer. These include ambitious weekend activities such as an overnight trip to London.

p.2

improvement to be good

Most safeguarding concerns are managed well. However, on two occasions managers’ responses to concerns relating to domestic abuse have been insufficient. Referrals were not made to the local authority when they should have been. This did not safeguard children. Inspection report for residential special school - Aurora Eccles School 3 The quality of safeguarding case records is still not consistently good enough. One case record offered no clarity on the rationale for a significant change in response to a safeguarding concern.

p.2

improvement to be good

Children feel safe in the residential provision. Children talked about trusted adults to whom they can go when they have worries.

p.3

improvement to be good

When concerns about staff conduct arise, managers take quick and effective action. Managers share information with the designated officer and keep clear records.

p.3

improvement to be good

The management team has updated children’s risk assessments. These assessments now consider the individual response required should a child go missing.

p.3

improvement to be good

Behaviour is good in the residential provision. There have been no physical interventions, restraints or incidents of children going missing. The staff help children to stay safe when accessing the internet. The staff address the use of racist and homophobic names through anti-bullying groups and targeted lessons and assemblies.

p.3

good

The head of care, her staff and the management team have worked hard to address the issues that were identified at the last inspection. Managers have met the previously unmet national minimum standard and five of the six recommendations.

p.3

good

None of the residential staff have the required level 3 qualification. All are working towards this except for one member of staff who holds a qualification that the management team has decided is equivalent. However, managers have not mapped the qualification to show how it is equivalent. Managers are therefore unaware if this qualification is a suitable alternative.

p.3

good

Managers undertake a range of quality assurance and audit activities. These are positive and contribute to improvements in some areas. However, these activities do not provide enough oversight of safeguarding records. As a result, opportunities to improve practice and coach staff have been missed.

p.3

good

Children’s care and support plans reflect their identity and family circumstances. The plans are individualised and track progress.

p.3

good

Communication with families has improved. Managers ensure that regular reports are sent home. Staff share care plans with the families of children who reside at the school full time. Families are generally very positive about the provision.

p.3

good

The management team has improved the learning and development opportunities for staff. Additional training that is relevant to children’s needs and experiences is now provided. Inspection report for residential special school - Aurora Eccles School 4 An independent person visits the school each half term. The visitor’s reports provide a good level of challenge and encourage improvement. Inspection report for residential special school - Aurora Eccles School 5

p.3

special schools

The school does not meet the following national minimum standard for residential special schools:

p.5

special schools

 11.1. The school ensures that: arrangements are made to safeguard and promote the welfare of children at the school; and such arrangements have regard to any guidance issued by the Secretary of State.

p.5

Recommendations

 Ensure that staff and managers understand the effect of domestic abuse on children and how this may affect children’s behaviour. In particular, consider how domestic abuse may affect children who have communication difficulties.  Undertake a mapping exercise to demonstrate the suitability of staff’s qualifications and identify any potential gaps in demonstrable competencies and how they will be addressed.  Monitor and quality assure decision-making that relates to safeguarding and the support that is provided for staff who make those decisions.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’. This inspection was carried out under the Children Act 1989 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential special school - Aurora Eccles School 6

p.5

Residential special school details

Social care unique reference number: SC027660

p.6

Residential special school details

Headteacher/teacher in charge: Chris Brown

p.6

Residential special school details

Type of school: Residential special school

p.6

Residential special school details

Email address: chris.brown@the-aurora-group.com

p.6

Inspectors

Ashley Hinson, social care inspector (lead) Brenda McInerney, Her Majesty’s Inspector, social care Inspection report for residential special school - Aurora Eccles School 7 to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion