Social care · Social care inspection (SCCIF)
KIDS Smile
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
KIDS
- Inspection date verified
31 May 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Suzy Lemmy
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Good
- Postcode verified
N1 8HX
- Name on report verified
KIDS Smile
- URN verified
1231454
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2018.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
70% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Good (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In particular, ensure that staff clearly communicate with each other, so that all staff are aware of the plans made to ensure the safety of the children. p.2
- In particular, ensure that staff discuss the holiday scheme in supervisions and that the manager’s supervision records are readily available for review. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development7
“Staff’s close supervision of the children keeps them safe.” p.3Parents & families3
“Parents, as well as children, benefit from the scheme.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,116
- shorter than usual (typical 1609)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 43
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for residential holiday scheme for disabled children: KIDS Smile KIDS Smile KIDS 7-9 Elliott’s Place, London N1 8HX Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
disabled children
This residential scheme for disabled children is part of a charitable trust. The scheme provides weekend residential activity holidays throughout the year. Children who use the scheme may have learning disabilities, physical disabilities and/or sensory needs. The manager has been registered with Ofsted since 13 October 2016.
p.1
Overall experience and progress of
children and young people, taking into account:
p.1
good
How well children, young people are helped and protected good
p.1
good
The effectiveness of leaders and managers good
p.1
good
The residential holiday scheme for disabled children provides effective services that meet the requirements for good.
p.1
good
Date of previous inspection: 27 April 2018
p.1
good
Overall judgement at last inspection: outstanding
p.1
good
Enforcement action since last inspection: none Inspection report for residential holiday scheme for disabled children: KIDS Smile
p.1
Recommendations
◼ Staff and volunteers actively promote the welfare of children for the duration of the scheme. (National Minimum Standards, 3.2)
p.2
Recommendations
In particular, ensure that staff clearly communicate with each other, so that all staff are aware of the plans made to ensure the safety of the children.
p.2
Recommendations
◼ Employees are easily able to access the advice needed to provide a holiday service for children and young people. (National Minimum Standards, 12.1)
p.2
Recommendations
In particular, ensure that staff discuss the holiday scheme in supervisions and that the manager’s supervision records are readily available for review. Inspection report for residential holiday scheme for disabled children: KIDS Smile
p.2
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff interact well with the children and form good relationships with them. The children benefit from access to activities which they would otherwise not be able to experience. They make progress as a result of the opportunities they have during the holiday scheme. One child was previously reluctant to socialise with his peers, but he is now confident to access other short breaks services. His parent reported that he now ‘happily goes to any weekends he gets invited to’. Another child who didn’t previously interact with the other children now responds to them.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff value children’s views and seek their feedback in a number of ways. Parent and child questionnaires have been reviewed to make them more accessible to the children. In addition, children are able to give their views formally and informally throughout their time at the scheme. A laminated copy of a range of faces depicting feelings is used to help children express their emotions. Children are encouraged to choose whether to participate in activities; ‘challenge by choice’ is the holiday scheme motto.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Staff visit children and their parents prior to them attending the scheme to update the children’s care plans. This ensures that staff have all the necessary information to meet the children’s needs. The matching process is effective in ensuring that the children like spending time together. This is reviewed after each scheme to ensure that any incompatibility issues are addressed.
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Parents, as well as children, benefit from the scheme. One parent said the scheme is run by a ‘well organised company with lovely staff’ and is ‘a valuable asset to parents like myself’. Another parent reported, ‘We have been privileged to be able to use this wonderful support on many occasions.’
p.3
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: good
Activities are well managed by the staff and the external provider. Any changes are communicated to the children, who are reassured by staff to reduce their anxiety and minimise the impact on them. On the whole, communications between staff and leaders is effective, however there was an occasion when better communication would have made the plan to safeguard a child clearer to all staff.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Any safeguarding concerns are responded to swiftly and reported to external agencies. Staff are vigilant and alert to children potentially making themselves unsafe. They have a good awareness of the children’s vulnerabilities. Staff’s close supervision of the children keeps them safe.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff are trained in safeguarding policies and procedures. Those spoken to demonstrated a good knowledge of how this works in practice. Team meetings are Inspection report for residential holiday scheme for disabled children: KIDS Smile used to discuss scenarios and identify any gaps in staff’s knowledge.
p.3
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Risk assessments have been reviewed, are up to date, and are specific to each child. Staff are informed of any areas of concern and how to keep the children safe from harm.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Staff are trained in behaviour management techniques, especially de-escalation skills. Physical intervention has not been needed. The matching process, staff support, and well-chosen activities mean that children do not present with any behavioural difficulties necessitating this type of intervention.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Medication policies are clear and adhered to. The manager ensures that medication is safely stored. Staff are meticulous in administering medication to children and recording the details accurately. Two members of staff administer medication to children to reduce any risk of errors.
p.4
How well children and young people are helped and protected: good
Children’s safety is a priority for the centre organisers, manager and staff. Staff review the site’s risk assessments to ensure that the venue is of a high safety standard. Staff ensure that children are aware of what to do in the event of a fire. They inform children of actions to take should they hear the alarm, including where to assemble.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The registered manager has extensive experience of working with disabled children. She works across the organisation and knows the children well. She has developed the service and increased her responsibilities within the organisation to raise awareness of the benefits of the scheme. She is committed to improving the service and offering a high standard of care to the children who attend.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The scheme is well organised, and staff adapt to changes of circumstances. The ethos is for children to have fun, gain new experiences and develop social skills.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Recruitment practice is safe and thorough. All of the necessary checks are made, including verbal verification of references. Staff undertake an induction and extensive training prior to working on the scheme. They shadow more experienced staff. This ensures that only staff who are confident to work with the children are employed.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
Staff generally have a discussion at the end of each day and after the scheme. They discuss positives and any areas of concern or improvement. This is a time of reflection which informs plans for subsequent schemes. Staff have regular supervision. However, supervision records do not reflect specific discussions about the holiday scheme. The registered manager’s supervision records were not available for review.
p.4
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: good
The organisation values the scheme. Spot checks by the service manager ensure that Inspection report for residential holiday scheme for disabled children: KIDS Smile the scheme is quality assured and subject to internal scrutiny. Notifications are appropriately made to Ofsted, and reflect effective action taken by the manager and staff to keep children safe.
p.4
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of the help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the residential holiday scheme for disabled children knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.5
Information about this inspection
Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Residential Holiday Schemes for Disabled Children (England) Regulations 2013 and the national minimum standards. Inspection report for residential holiday scheme for disabled children: KIDS Smile
p.5
Residential holiday scheme for disabled children details
Registered provider address: 7-9 Elliott’s Place, London N1 8HX Responsible individual: Mrs Caroline Stevens Registered manager: Mrs Clare Turner
p.6
Residential holiday scheme for disabled children details
Email address: southeastadmin@kids.org.uk
p.6
Inspector
Suzy Lemmy, social care inspector Inspection report for residential holiday scheme for disabled children: KIDS Smile to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.6
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.7
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.7
Inspector
T: 0300 123 4234 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion