Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

St Jude's Catholic Primary School

Inspected 14 May 2019 · published 7 Jun 2019 · URN 116376

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    14 May 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Brian Macdonald

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    PO14 1ND

  • Name on report verified

    St Jude’s Catholic Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectivelyenjoyeffectivehappyfeel safeextremelyhigh-quality
Criticismconcernsseriouslypersistently absentbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1354w+51
  • What needs to improve75w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,421
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 86%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Sarah Wall Headteacher St Jude’s Catholic Primary School Bishopsfield Road Fareham Hampshire PO14 1ND

p.1

Short inspection of St Jude’s Catholic Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 14 May 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in July 2015.

p.1

Short inspection of St Jude’s Catholic Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. With the support of your senior leaders and staff, you have continued to build on the strengths recognised at the previous inspection. You constantly seek ways to further improve the school. As an example, you are working to enhance the curriculum by the adding more opportunities for pupils to become involved in community events and visit local places of interest. The development of the forest school has also been a great success, enabling pupils to learn more about the environment. You are also quick to address any underperformance and have acted swiftly to reverse last year’s dip in pupils’ progress in writing.

p.1

Short inspection of St Jude’s Catholic Primary School

Pupils at the school are very polite. On inspection, I was greeted by a pupil who welcomed me, shook my hand and introduced himself, before engaging in conversation about how much he loves the school. Pupils say that they enjoy learning and that their teachers are friendly, fun and teach interesting lessons. There is a calm, purposeful atmosphere within the school and pupils settle quickly to work and listen respectfully to adults and other pupils.

p.1

Short inspection of St Jude’s Catholic Primary School

You have addressed the recommendation from the last inspection to improve the expertise in mathematical reasoning skills of all teachers. Both the leadership and teaching of mathematics are now strong. Pupils are given many opportunities to solve problems and use their reasoning skills during lessons. Mathematical apparatus is used effectively, and the most able pupils are challenged appropriately. Skilful questioning and insistence on the correct use of mathematical vocabulary have contributed to the improvements in the teaching of mathematics and progress made by pupils.

p.1

Short inspection of St Jude’s Catholic Primary School

The last inspection also asked you to improve pupils’ attendance. A change in policy and the implementation of new practices have had a positive impact on attendance. For example, you have introduced awards for good attendance and have established a parents’ forum, where the importance of good attendance is discussed. As a result, overall attendance this year is now at least in line with the national average. The attendance of disadvantaged pupils has increased significantly and the proportion of pupils who are persistently absent has reduced.

p.2

Short inspection of St Jude’s Catholic Primary School

There have been many recent changes to the governing body. Some governors are currently undertaking training to enable them to fulfil their roles more effectively. However, governors provide leaders with effective challenge, especially regarding the progress made by pupils and rates of attendance. Governors are aware of the school’s priorities for improvement. Plans are in place to increase the number of governors’ visits during the school day.

p.2

Short inspection of St Jude’s Catholic Primary School

Staff are highly supportive of leaders and appreciate the many opportunities they have for professional development. Every member of staff who responded to Ofsted’s survey said they are proud to work at the school. They also said that leaders ensure that staff’s work–life balance is considered when making changes.

p.2

Short inspection of St Jude’s Catholic Primary School

Nearly all parents who responded to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, said that they would recommend the school to others. One parent, reflecting the views of many, commented: ‘My children are extremely happy to go to St Jude’s. They are always happy to go to school. If concerns are raised, they are taken seriously and resolved appropriately. All staff at St Jude’s are dedicated, professional and always have the children’s best interests at heart.’

p.2

Short inspection of St Jude’s Catholic Primary School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and that the safety and welfare of pupils and staff have high priority. Leaders maintain extensive records of concerns electronically. This enables the designated safeguarding lead to build a picture of any emerging issues and investigate them further. The safeguarding governor regularly visits the school to check that policies and procedures are in place and adhered to. Staff and governors receive regular safeguarding training. They know what to do should they have concerns about pupils’ well-being.

p.2

Short inspection of St Jude’s Catholic Primary School

Pupils say that they feel safe at school and know who to talk to if they have any concerns or worries. Parents agree that their children are safe and feel safe in school. Pupils learn how to stay safe in a range of situations, including when on the road and when using the internet or a mobile phone.

p.2

Inspection findings

 At the start of the inspection, we agreed to look at specific areas of the school’s provision: the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements; the teaching of writing; the progress of disadvantaged pupils; the progress of pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND); and the breadth and balance of the curriculum.  The amount of progress that pupils make in their writing, from the end of key stage 1 to the end of key stage 2, has decreased for the past two years. In 2018, it was significantly below that made by pupils nationally. With the support of senior leaders, you have investigated why this has happened. As a result, you have introduced changes to the ways that teaching and pupils’ work are monitored and evaluated. You identified that many pupils at your school have had little experience of the outside world. This limits the experience they can draw on when writing and their choice of vocabulary. In response to this, you

p.3

Inspection findings

have introduced more trips and visits to places of interest, giving pupils more first-hand experience. In addition, high-quality texts are used as class readers in each year and you now insist that, while in school, pupils only read from books that are appropriate to their reading ability. These changes have enabled pupils to increase their vocabulary and develop their writing skills. Pupils’ work in books and on display around the school confirms that most are now making strong progress in their writing. Leaders are aware, however, that these new practices and strategies need more time to become fully embedded across the school.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils at the school, although increasing, is below the national average. These pupils are carefully supported both emotionally and academically. Work in their books and the school’s own progress information show that disadvantaged pupils currently at the school are making

p.3

Inspection findings

strong progress. Indeed, many disadvantaged pupils are now making stronger progress than other pupils. As a result, the difference in progress made between disadvantaged pupils at the school and other pupils nationally is close to being eradicated.  The proportion of pupils with SEND in the school has recently increased sharply. All pupils with SEND are well catered for. Their individual needs are quickly identified, and appropriate programmes are put in place to support them. These programmes are closely monitored, evaluated and altered if they are not having the desired impact on each pupil’s progress. The school’s current progress information and work in books show that these pupils are making very good progress from their various starting points. Good relationships between the school and outside agencies, who readily provide additional, effective support, ensure that the needs of this group of pupils are met effectively.

p.3

Inspection findings

 The curriculum is broad and balanced. There is evidence in the displays of pupils’ work, work in books and visits to classrooms that the foundation subjects, such as history, music and art, are fully covered. Pupils say that they enjoy learning through topic. A group of pupils spoke to me at length about the work they are doing on the Second World War and were excited about their planned ‘evacuation day’. Many links are made between subjects and these are enhanced by first-hand experiences through visits to places of interest, such as Portchester Castle or Selbourne. You regularly review and update your curriculum and are currently developing a more robust system for identifying pupils who have not grasped key concepts within their topic work.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 improvements made to the teaching of writing are embedded, enabling pupils to sustain the strong progress that they have made this year.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Portsmouth (rc), the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I met with you and your senior leadership team to discuss the school’s self-evaluation and plans for improvement. You and I visited every class to observe pupils learning, talk to them and look at their work. We also looked at the quality of work in pupils’ books. I met with two governors, including the chair of the governing body, and also met with middle leaders. I had a meeting with a representative of the local authority.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I considered the school’s documentation relating to safeguarding, governance, pupils’ progress and attainment. During breaktime, I spoke informally to pupils to gather their views of the school. There were no responses to Ofsted’s pupil questionnaire. I took account of the views of parents by analysing 51 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 50 free-text comments. I also considered 17 responses to the staff survey.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion