Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Cambridge School
Summary
Barney Geen (lead), Penny Barratt
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
1 May 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Barney Geen, Penny Barratt
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
W12 0SP
- Name on report verified
Cambridge School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding5
“A strong culture of safeguarding is evident.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,092
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr A Campbell Headteacher Cambridge School 61 Bryony Rd White City London W12 0SP
p.1
Short inspection of Cambridge School
Following my visit to the school on 1 May 2019 with Barney Geen, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in May 2015.
p.1
Short inspection of Cambridge School
You and your leadership team have maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. The governing body and leadership team have overseen a period of increasing pupil numbers. Furthermore, the range of pupils’ needs has changed over the past few years. You have ensured that pupils still receive an appropriate quality of education during this period.
p.1
Short inspection of Cambridge School
You clearly explained that the school has a very varied intake and the school operates as ‘two schools within a school’. The school has admitted pupils with an increased range of educational needs and you have grouped pupils into two main cohorts, one being pupils with social, emotional and mental health needs, and the other being pupils with learning difficulties and additional needs. You and other leaders have ensured that all pupils are safe and are provided with a curriculum that matches their needs. However, you also provide the pupils with a sense of ‘one school’ through lunchtimes and assemblies together, and through the use of the newly introduced ‘house system’.
p.1
Short inspection of Cambridge School
Leadership tasks are shared among your team, with assistant heads and middle leaders taking responsibility for different aspects of the school’s work. This works very effectively. You and your leadership team have a thorough understanding of the school and are systematically driving improvements. Safeguarding is effective.
p.1
Short inspection of Cambridge School
A strong culture of safeguarding is evident. Leaders and the governing body have ensured that safeguarding systems and procedures are fit for purpose. Regular training for staff ensures that the well-being and safety of the pupils are paramount.
p.2
Short inspection of Cambridge School
Leaders make sure that all the required checks take place when recruiting staff and governors monitor safeguarding thoroughly on a termly basis. Pupils, parents and carers say that the school is a place where the pupils feel safe.
p.2
Short inspection of Cambridge School
Leaders are aware that the pupils attending the school are particularly vulnerable. The school works well with other agencies to safeguard pupils. Pupils have a strong knowledge about how to keep themselves safe and are able to report what they would do to keep safe in specific scenarios, both in and outside of school.
p.2
Inspection findings
During the inspection, we agreed to look at specific areas of the school’s work. The first area was to look at the action taken to improve pupils’ attendance and reduce the rate of persistent absence. This was because your records show that attendance is below the national average. We found that leaders are implementing strategies for improving pupils’ attendance. You ensure that pupils with attendance rates below 90% are monitored each week. You and other leaders have developed effective systems to support the different cohorts of pupils in a range of ways, such as attendance cards for those who respond to these. Pupils told us about the rewards available for good attendance and are encouraged by these. As a result of the school’s work, pupils’ attendance has improved in this academic year from 85% to 89% and persistent absence has dropped. Although this is a promising start, you are aware that attendance needs to remain a focus for the
p.2
Inspection findings
school. The second area we agreed to look at was the approaches leaders are taking to manage pupils’ behaviour and reduce the number of exclusions. This is an area of work that you and other leaders have focused on developing. You have appointed key staff to oversee behaviour throughout the school. They have put in place systems. The information from these systems is used to make any changes required to classroom routines or behaviour plans. Staff are well supported to address any behaviour difficulties presented and to use the school’s systems consistently. Teachers and leaders work together effectively to create individual behaviour plans for pupils. These help to ensure that all staff understand how to meet each pupil’s needs. Pupils engage well with the school’s rewards and house systems, which encourage positive behaviour. Pupils are positive about the behaviour in the school. They report no concerns around bullying.
p.2
Inspection findings
The inspection evidence found that pupils behave well, staff manage pupils’ behaviour effectively and the number of exclusions has reduced. We also looked at the extent to which the curriculum is helping pupils to achieve well, taking into account their different needs and abilities. We agreed to look at this to make sure the curriculum is matched to the needs of the pupils who are presently attending the school. Leaders demonstrate a clear understanding of the school’s curriculum. It is clearly defined, with different pathways for pupils in key stages 3 and 4. The rationale is clear and meets the needs of different groups of pupils well. The curriculum is well designed to prepare pupils for life after school, with a focus on life skills and independence. Pupils are positive about learning. They engage well with the curriculum. In most of the lessons we visited, the work was suitably matched to meet pupils’ needs
p.2
Inspection findings
and abilities. Occasionally, however, teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are not consistently high across different subjects. The final area we agreed to focus on was the school’s processes and procedures for assessing and tracking pupils’ progress and attainment. This is an area the school has spent considerable time developing and you wanted feedback on. Leaders collect information systematically about pupils’ learning and they review this information effectively to inform future teaching. Assessment responsibilities are shared among the senior team, which works well together to support teachers. Pupils’ individual goals are consistently visible in all classrooms and remind both staff and pupils of their targets. Helpful information grids are placed in pupils’ books to support them in attaining their targets. You, together with other leaders, ensure that assessment information is used effectively to support pupils’
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are consistently high in all subjects taught pupils’ attendance continues to remain a focus so that it improves still further.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hammersmith and Fulham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, inspectors held meetings with you, the assistant headteachers, the assessment lead and the ‘higher level’ teaching assistant with responsibility for behaviour. We held conversations with parents and the vice-chair of the governing body, had discussion with teachers and spoke with different pupils throughout the day. We visited classrooms to observe pupils’ learning and these were made jointly with you and the assistant headteachers. Inspectors scrutinised the school’s attendance, curriculum and assessment procedures.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion