Other · Ofsted report
Prospects Training International Limited
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
26 Apr 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Paul Cocker
- Postcode verified
NG21 0HJ
- Name on report verified
Prospects Training International Limited
- URN verified
1237126
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 22
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- —
- Average sentence
- 7 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Prospects Training International Limited Monitoring visit report
p.1
Name of lead inspector: Paul Cocker, Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.1
Type of provider: Independent learning provider
p.1
Address:
Ransom Wood Business Park Southwell Road West Mansfield Nottinghamshire NG21 0HJ Monitoring visit: Prospects Training International Limited, 25–26 April 2019
p.1
Context and focus of visit
From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
Prospects Training International Limited (PTIL), which trades as Geason Training, was established in 2008. The company offers apprenticeships and adult training through subcontracting arrangements with several large colleges and training providers across England. PTIL received a contract to offer directly delivered apprenticeship programmes in 2017. In December 2018, PTIL was acquired by the Speedy Group of companies.
p.2
Context and focus of visit
At the time of the monitoring visit, there were 1,017 apprentices. Of these, almost all were adults. Around one in five study the recently introduced apprenticeship standards, while the remaining apprentices study legacy apprenticeship frameworks. The large majority of apprentices study construction-related programmes with around one quarter studying business-focused apprenticeships in disciplines such as digital marketing, administration, business management, and information and communication technology (ICT).
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers do not ensure that the principles and requirements of an apprenticeship are met. They do not ensure that the curriculum is congruent with the needs and requirements of the employer and those of the apprentice. Too many apprentices receive a poor standard of training and have insufficient opportunity to take part in off-the-job training. Poor leadership has been a key contributor to the fact that apprentices do not develop substantial new knowledge and skills and have merely focused on accrediting existing competencies.
p.2
Insufficient progress
The senior management team has been too slow to implement effective strategies to ensure that apprentices develop substantial new knowledge, skills and behaviours. They have only very recently recruited a new management team, which has implemented a range of new strategies to improve apprentices’ experiences. These Monitoring visit: Prospects Training International Limited, 25–26 April 2019 improvements include an extensive induction programme, rigorous information, advice and guidance, and working closely with employers to develop curriculums to meet the needs of businesses and apprentices alike. However, these improvements have only had a positive impact on the experiences of a very small minority of apprentices who started their programmes from January 2019.
p.2
Insufficient progress
Leaders and managers do not have a sufficiently accurate oversight of the progress that apprentices make on their programme. They do not know how well apprentices progress in developing the knowledge and skills that they need to be successful in their job. Consequently, they cannot swiftly intervene when apprentices make slow progress to help them catch up. This has resulted in only one in five apprentices completing their apprenticeship on time in the current year, which is too low.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Leaders have recruited appropriately experienced non-executive board members to a supervisory board to hold senior leaders to account. The board members have appropriate experience of apprenticeships and the work-based learning sector, both at a strategic and operational level.
p.3
Insufficient progress
While members of an appropriate supervisory board have been recruited, the information that they receive to hold leaders and managers to account is not sufficiently rigorous to improve, swiftly, the poor experience that the vast majority of apprentices receive. The reports they receive focus too much on achievement rates and completed assessments as a proxy for progress. Consequently, they are unaware that apprentices do not receive their entitlement to off-the-job training or that they fail to develop the knowledge, skills and behaviours that they need to be successful in their current jobs and future careers.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Trainers do not collect detailed, and in many cases, accurate, information about apprentices’ existing knowledge, skills and experience at the start of their programme. This leads to trainers not having a clear understanding of what apprentices know and what they need to learn. Trainers merely accredit existing knowledge, skills and experience as opposed to ensuring that apprentices learn new ones, contrary to the principles and requirements of an apprenticeship.
p.3
Insufficient progress
Planning of apprentices’ training is poor. Trainers do not plan apprentices’ learning to ensure that they develop the substantial skills they need in their workplace. Furthermore, they do not consistently set targets that challenge apprentices to achieve at the start, or throughout their programme. This means that apprentices do not develop substantial knowledge and skills or make the progress of which they are capable. Monitoring visit: Prospects Training International Limited, 25–26 April 2019 Trainers do not ensure that the needs and requirements of employers are considered when planning apprentices’ learning. Too many employers are not involved in the planning of the apprentices’ learning programme, which in extreme cases leads to apprentices studying programmes that are inappropriate for their job role. This has a significant impact on apprentices’ social mobility, as they cannot complete their
p.3
Insufficient progress
apprenticeship or subsequently improve their earning potential.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Most apprentices do not benefit from appropriately planned or enough high-quality off-the-job training. This lack of training has a demonstrable impact on the progress they make on their programme, and the knowledge, skills and experiences that they acquire. A few apprentices rightly feel aggrieved at the need to study in their own time, which should be completed within their working week.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Progress reviews are ineffective. Trainers do not give apprentices accurate information on how well they are progressing on their programme or helpful feedback on how to improve their work. This results in apprentices not being clear about what aspects of their work are of a good standard, what they need to do to improve their work, and how well they are progressing.
p.4
Insufficient progress
Managers and trainers rightly recognise that the initial advice and guidance for most apprentices prior to January 2019 were poor. As a result, a significant majority of apprentices left their programme early and failed to achieve their apprenticeship. Recently, managers have implemented more rigorous checks before apprentices start the programme to ensure that they are placed on the right level and that employers are fully committed to supporting their apprentices. This has resulted in an improved experience for most starters from January 2019, which accounts for a very small minority of all apprentices. Far fewer of these apprentices leave their programmes early.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Leaders and managers place a high priority on safeguarding apprentices. They have developed a comprehensive range of policies, procedures and guidance documents that ensure that members of staff are clear on what they should do if they have any safeguarding-related concerns.
p.4
Reasonable progress
The designated safeguarding lead (DSL) and the deputy DSL have received appropriate training to ensure that they have the appropriate knowledge and skills to execute their roles. All members of staff receive periodical update training on safeguarding, which assists them in supporting apprentices and ensures that if a referral needs to be made, they follow the correct processes and procedures. Monitoring visit: Prospects Training International Limited, 25–26 April 2019 Leaders and managers complete appropriate checks on new and existing staff to ensure that they are suitable to work with young people and vulnerable adults. Apprentices feel safe and are safe.
p.4
Reasonable progress
Most apprentices have an appropriate understanding of safeguarding and know whom to contact should they have any concerns. However, apprentices’ understanding of the risks associated with radicalisation and extremism is less well developed.
p.5
Reasonable progress
Leaders have nurtured effective relationships with external agencies, particularly around the East Midlands region. They use these links to gain information on a national scale about the risks in localities where apprentices are situated, particularly in relation to the dangers in relation to radicalisation and extremism. Leaders use this information to inform training for apprentices and to inform their internal risk assessments. Monitoring visit: Prospects Training International Limited, 25–26 April 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or
p.5
Reasonable progress
provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Reasonable progress
Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .
p.6
Reasonable progress
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team,
p.6
Reasonable progress
The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Reasonable progress
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.6
Reasonable progress
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion