Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder 319761
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
15 May 2019
- Inspectors verified
Kerry Holder
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Name on report verified
Childminder report
- URN verified
319761
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The weaknesses in leadership and management compromise children's well-being. p.3
- The childminder is not aware of current wider safeguarding issues, such as indicators that children may be at risk of harm from extreme views. p.3
- Self-evaluation is not sufficiently robust to fully identify and prioritise areas for improvement. p.1
- The childminder's knowledge of wider safeguarding issues, for example how to protect children from the risks of radicalisation and extreme views, is weak. p.1
- The childminder has a poor knowledge of her legal responsibility to notify Ofsted of significant events. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. p.2
- The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the childminder. p.2
- The inspector held a number of discussions with the childminder. p.2
- She looked at relevant documentation and evidence of the suitability of persons living in the household. p.2
- The inspector spoke to children during the inspection. p.2
- The inspector discussed self-evaluation and how the views of parents and children are included to drive improvement. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Wellbeing & mental health3
“The weaknesses in leadership and management compromise children's well-being.” p.3Progress & outcomes3
“This motivates children to learn and helps them to make good progress.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 731
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date 15 May 2019 Previous inspection date 2 October 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Previous inspection: Good 2 Effectiveness of leadership and management Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good 2 Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4 Outcomes for children Good 2
p.1
This provision is inadequate
n The childminder's knowledge of wider safeguarding issues, for example how to protect children from the risks of radicalisation and extreme views, is weak. n Children's safety cannot be assured because the childminder does not have an accurate record of children's attendance. n The childminder has a poor knowledge of her legal responsibility to notify Ofsted of significant events. n The childminder has not yet fully established a targeted programme of professional development to further enhance the quality of teaching and learning. n Self-evaluation is not sufficiently robust to fully identify and prioritise areas for improvement.
p.1
It has the following strengths
n The childminder uses assessments effectively to track children's development. She uses this information to plan appropriate interesting activities. This motivates children to learn and helps them to make good progress. n The childminder manages children's behaviour effectively. She offers meaningful praise to children for their achievements, helping to raise their confidence and self-esteem.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and Childcare Register the provider must: Due date develop a secure understanding of how to identify and protect children at risk from extreme views and radicalisation 12/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
maintain an accurate record of the names of children being cared for on the premises and their hours of attendance 12/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
develop a thorough understanding of events to be notified to Ofsted. 12/06/2019
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n extend the programme of professional development, and raise standards in teaching and learning to an even higher level n develop the systems for evaluating all aspects of practice to identify and address any weaknesses in provision.
p.2
What the setting needs to do to improve further
n The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. n The inspector completed a joint evaluation of an activity with the childminder. n The inspector held a number of discussions with the childminder. She looked at relevant documentation and evidence of the suitability of persons living in the household. n The inspector spoke to children during the inspection. n The inspector discussed self-evaluation and how the views of parents and children are included to drive improvement.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management is inadequate
The childminder does not identify weaknesses in her practice effectively. Arrangements for safeguarding are ineffective. The childminder is not aware of current wider safeguarding issues, such as indicators that children may be at risk of harm from extreme views. The childminder is not fully aware of the reasons she must contact Ofsted in the occurrence of significant events. Furthermore, she does not keep an accurate record of children's attendance. This means that she cannot guarantee children's safety in the event of an emergency. Nonetheless, the childminder completes regular risk assessments to help identify and minimise any hazards to children in her home. She has established links with the local school to help support children in their future transitions.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good
The childminder is actively involved in children's play. For example, she supports young children's communication and language effectively, as she plays alongside them. The childminder asks questions to support children's thinking skills and repeats words to help their understanding. The childminder offers a balance of adult-led and child-initiated learning experiences and has an accurate overview of children's development. The childminder speaks to parents daily to pass on information about their children's general care routines and activities that they have enjoyed. Children thoroughly enjoy using their imagination and taking part in role-play activities. For example, they play with dolls and put them on the apparatus outdoors, such as the small slide.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Children's safety is not assured. The weaknesses in leadership and management compromise children's well-being. However, the childminder has a friendly nature with children, who demonstrate that they feel emotionally secure in her care. Children's good health is promoted and they enjoy nutritious snacks and daily fresh air. Children have regular opportunities to play in the childminders garden and go on walks in the local community, which helps to support their physical abilities.
p.3
Outcomes for children are good
Children make good progress and develop skills that help them prepare for starting school. For example, children attend a range of groups within the community. This provides regular opportunities for children to build relationships to support their social skills. Children learn to count and are encouraged to use number language in their play. This helps to develop their mathematical skills. Children develop their early writing skills as they experiment with different materials, such as paint.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number 319761 Local authority Leeds Inspection number 10064234 Type of provision Childminder
p.4
Registers
Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Day care type Childminder Age range of children 2 - 11 Total number of places 6 Number of children on roll 6 Date of previous inspection 2 October 2015
p.4
Registers
The childminder registered in 1991 and lives in Pudsey, Leeds. She operates all year round from 7am to 5.30pm, Monday to Friday, except bank holidays and family holidays.
p.4
Registers
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children's learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
Registers
procedures set out in the guidance Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted, which is available from Ofsted's website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children's services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
Registers
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.5
Registers
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk
p.5
Registers
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: www.ofsted.gov.uk/user .
p.5
Registers
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion