Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
St Mark's CofE Primary School
Summary
Luisa Gould (lead), Claire Martin-O’Donoghue
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 May 2019
- Inspectors verified
Claire Martin-O’Donoghue, Luisa Gould
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
BN2 5EA
- Name on report verified
St Mark’s C of E Primary School
- URN verified
114545
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Safeguarding policies and procedures are very well embedded and all adults have a clear understanding of their responsibilities to keep pupils safe. p.4
- Leaders and staff provide highly effective support for pupils who face challenging personal circumstances. p.5
- Relationships between adults and pupils are extremely positive. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve the effectiveness of leaders by ensuring that: – the skills of all leaders are sufficiently developed so that they can fulfil their roles with consistent effectiveness – all leaders are clear about school priorities and understand precisely what needs to be done to bring about rapid improvement. p.2
- Improve pupils’ behaviour by eradicating low-level disruption in lessons. p.2
- In the past, leaders have not monitored the quality of teaching and learning closely enough. p.3
- They have not been quick enough to address the decline in pupils’ outcomes. p.3
- This has led to some pupils making limited progress and not achieving the expectations for their age. p.3
- Not all leaders have the necessary skills and expertise to support the headteacher in making rapid improvements. p.3
- Some leaders are overly generous in their evaluations of the quality of teaching and the rates of progress pupils make. p.3
- In addition, some leaders do not have a clear enough understanding of the precise actions that are needed to bring about rapid improvement. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes41
“Too many pupils are making insufficient progress from their starting points.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,736
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 14 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Mark’s C of E Primary School Manor Road, Brighton, East Sussex BN2 5EA
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Pupils’ outcomes are not good enough. Too many pupils are making insufficient progress from their starting points. Leaders have recently made a number of changes to improve the way reading, writing and mathematics are taught across the school. While these changes are beginning to impact positively on pupils’ progress, too many gaps in pupils’ skills and knowledge remain. The leadership team does not yet consistently make an impact on raising standards. Improvement plans do not focus sharply enough on developing the skills of leaders. Frequently, teaching does not adequately challenge pupils in their learning. This is particularly the case for the most able pupils. Pupils’ behaviour and attitudes to learning are inconsistent. When teaching does not meet the needs of all pupils, some pupils lose concentration and disrupt learning.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders and governors have a comprehensive understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They acknowledge that pupils’ progress has not always been good enough. Leadership in the early years is good. Children make strong progress from their starting points. Disadvantaged pupils make strong progress from their starting points. The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) ensures that provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is effective. As a result, this group of pupils make good progress. Pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Relationships between school staff and pupils is a strength of the school. Leaders ensure that pupils are given many opportunities to develop their emotional resilience and well-being.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the effectiveness of leaders by ensuring that: – the skills of all leaders are sufficiently developed so that they can fulfil their roles with consistent effectiveness – all leaders are clear about school priorities and understand precisely what needs to be done to bring about rapid improvement. Improve the quality of teaching to accelerate pupils’ progress in key stage 1 and key stage 2 by: – ensuring that all pupils, including the most able, are sufficiently challenged in English and mathematics – making sure that teachers provide adequate opportunities for pupils in key stage 2 to develop the more complex skills in reading, for example inference and deduction – ensuring that teachers plan effectively to address gaps in pupils’ knowledge in writing, so that pupils can independently apply the core skills expected for their age – providing regular opportunities for pupils to apply their fluency skills in problem-
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
solving and reasoning tasks, so that pupils’ understanding is deepened in mathematics – ensuring that teachers use assessment to inform their planning so that lessons routinely meet the needs of all pupils in English and mathematics. Improve pupils’ behaviour by eradicating low-level disruption in lessons.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
In the past, leaders have not monitored the quality of teaching and learning closely enough. They have not been quick enough to address the decline in pupils’ outcomes. This has led to some pupils making limited progress and not achieving the expectations for their age. Not all leaders have the necessary skills and expertise to support the headteacher in making rapid improvements. Some leaders are overly generous in their evaluations of the quality of teaching and the rates of progress pupils make. In addition, some leaders do not have a clear enough understanding of the precise actions that are needed to bring about rapid improvement. In recent months, the headteacher and the deputy headteacher have taken action to address school weaknesses. A range of new approaches to the teaching of English and mathematics have been implemented. Some improvements have started to impact positively on pupils’ progress. However, it is too early for these improvements to affect
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
outcomes in key stage 1 or key stage 2. Middle leaders have recently received high-quality professional development in English and mathematics. As a result, they have acquired strong expertise in these subjects. However, they have not yet had sufficient time to influence and improve practice across the whole school. Leaders and governors have been proactive in seeking the advice and support offered by the local authority. Advisers have provided school leaders with useful training and advice. This has helped to improve the quality of teaching in the school and the progress that pupils make. Pupils with SEND make good progress because the SENCo has high aspirations for them. Procedures to support their learning are well developed. The next step is to ensure that procedures are clearly disseminated to all staff so that there is a consistency of approach across the school. The specialist provision unit has had a
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
positive impact on pupils’ engagement in learning and the progress they make in speech and language over time. Disadvantaged pupils make good progress and often outperform their classmates in reading, writing and mathematics. Leaders and governors have a strong understanding of the needs of disadvantaged pupils in the school. The pupil premium grant is allocated effectively to help disadvantaged pupils overcome barriers to learning, as well as to develop their social and emotional resilience. Leaders monitor the impact of the primary physical education (PE) and sport premium. In PE lessons, pupils are given the opportunity to take part in a wide range of sporting activities, such as hockey, table tennis, swimming, cricket, golf and dance. The use of a specialist teacher has provided professional teaching for pupils and has developed the expertise of staff.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors know that standards have not been good enough since the last inspection. Recent reorganisation of the structure of the governing body has resulted in improvements in governors’ effectiveness. They know what is working and what needs to improve. They routinely hold the headteacher to account for pupils’ achievement. Governors visit the school often and know it well. They work alongside the headteacher to monitor the impact of new initiatives. They have a clear understanding of the quality of teaching, learning and pupils’ achievement. They work hard to support senior leaders, and their ambitions for the school are high. Governors take their responsibilities seriously and regularly check the effectiveness of the school’s safeguarding procedures. Governors monitor the work of leaders to ensure that pupils in the school are safe.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Records of recruitment procedures and checks on the suitability of staff to work in the school are thorough and accurate. The headteacher provides all staff with annual training about how to safeguard and protect pupils. Safeguarding policies and procedures are very well embedded and all adults have a clear understanding of their responsibilities to keep pupils safe. As a result, adults are confident to report any concerns they may have about pupils’ well- being. When required, the designated safeguarding leaders are quick to make referrals to other agencies. This ensures that pupils and their families receive the help they need in a timely manner. Pupils say they feel safe in school. They say that adults listen to them if they have a concern or worry. Pupils told inspectors that they trust the adults in their school.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
The quality of teaching, learning and assessment is too variable. Teaching does not meet the needs of all groups of pupils consistently well or challenge them sufficiently. As a result, pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding in reading, writing and mathematics are not always developed robustly enough. Scrutiny of pupils’ workbooks in English and mathematics shows that the recently implemented approaches to teaching are beginning to help pupils catch up. However, these changes have not been in place long enough to fully overcome previous weaknesses in pupils’ progress. When teaching is stronger, well-planned and structured activities enable pupils to develop and deepen their skills, knowledge and understanding. However, teachers do not always use assessment information accurately or effectively to identify how well pupils are learning. As a result, planning does not always meet the needs of all groups
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
of pupils, and this hinders pupils’ progress. The teaching of reading is improving and is helping pupils who have fallen behind catch up to where they need to be. Pupils enjoy reading and are particularly enthusiastic about the new school library. The library is a well-organised, inviting space and pupils make good use of the wide range of texts now available to them. Teachers ensure that books are well matched to the needs of pupils. Pupils in key stage 1 use their phonics skills well to help them read unknown words. However, pupils’ higher-level comprehension skills in key stage 2 are not yet always developed well enough, and some pupils have limited understanding of advanced vocabulary. Teachers do not always focus precisely enough on teaching pupils the core skills in writing. This has led to many pupils making limited progress. Too many pupils are working at a standard that is below where they should be for their age.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Leaders have recently made changes to how phonics is taught in the early years and key stage 1. This has significantly improved pupils’ phonics skills. They are now increasingly more able to apply their phonics knowledge to independent writing. The teaching of mathematics is not consistently good. Scrutiny of pupils’ workbooks shows that pupils are not routinely given enough opportunities for mathematical problem-solving or reasoning about number. As a result, some pupils do not make sufficient progress. Where pupils are given these opportunities, they are beginning to catch up to where they should be for their age. Teaching assistants are well deployed by teachers and provide effective support for pupils’ learning. They skilfully question pupils, guiding and challenging as needed. This often helps pupils successfully to complete the tasks set for them.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Relationships between adults and pupils are extremely positive. Leaders are passionate about the personal development, safety and welfare of the pupils in their care. They have considerable strengths in ensuring that the pastoral needs of pupils and their families are well provided for. St Mark’s is an inclusive school that offers effective support for its pupils. As a result, pupils settle well and feel happy and safe. Parents and carers who spoke to inspectors were very positive about the work of the school. They particularly praised the work of leaders and teachers in providing additional support, nurture and care for their children. The headteacher is passionately committed to the personal development and welfare of pupils. Leaders and staff provide highly effective support for pupils who face challenging personal circumstances. This ensures that vulnerable pupils have the skills
p.5
Personal development and welfare
needed to play an active role in day-to-day school life. Pupils are happy at school and keen to learn. They are self-assured and willing to talk to adults about their learning. Pupils are proud of the work they produce. They are enthusiastic about sharing their ideas and thoughts. Most pupils are confident to share their thinking in class lessons and during assemblies. Pupils understand what bullying is and say that bullying does not happen in their school. They state that this is because teachers are quick to deal with such incidents. Pupils care for each other and value the friendships they have in school.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. Leaders have recently implemented a new policy to improve pupils’ behaviour. Systems and procedures are now much more consistent. This has resulted in a sharp reduction of behaviour incidents in school. However, some pupils’ behaviour is still too variable. When teaching does not meet the needs of all pupils, some pupils disrupt classes by talking over the teacher or distracting others. Pupils told inspectors that this interrupts their learning. They also said that some pupils misbehave at playtime, but that adults deal with unwanted behaviour issues swiftly and effectively. Pupils’ attendance has improved. In 2018, pupils’ attendance was below the national average for primary schools. Leaders have evaluated systems to manage attendance and have made improvements. Current pupils’ attendance is closer to the national average. Fixed-term exclusion rates have been above the national average for the past two
p.6
Behaviour
years. Leaders have put effective measures in place to reduce the number of fixed- term exclusions.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
In 2018, pupils’ achievement in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of key stage 2 was well below the national average for primary schools at the expected standard or higher. In 2017, the proportion of pupils in Year 1 who reached the expected standard in phonics by the end of the year was below average. In 2018, it declined further. Changes to the way phonics was taught have started to improve phonics knowledge for current pupils. This is leading to improvements in pupils’ reading and writing in key stage 1. In 2018, the proportion of pupils in Year 2 who achieved age-related expectations in mathematics was broadly in line with the national average for primary schools. Pupils’ achievement in reading was close to the national average. However, pupils’ achievement in writing declined in 2018 and was well below the national average. Currently, pupils are making better progress in writing and are beginning to catch up.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
The achievement of the most able pupils is not yet good enough in key stage 2. This is because some teachers do not routinely provide the most able pupils with tasks that are sufficiently challenging. As a result, the most able pupils make less progress than they are capable of in some classes. In 2018, the proportion of pupils who exceeded age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics was well below the national average. In Year 2, more pupils achieved the higher standard in reading than other pupils nationally in 2018. Current disadvantaged pupils achieve well. This is because leaders ensure that this group of pupils have access to a wide range of additional support that is targeted accurately for pupils’ individual needs. The school’s assessment information indicates that disadvantaged pupils often make more progress than their classmates. Work in books confirms that disadvantaged pupils make strong progress in a range of subjects,
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
including English and mathematics. Most pupils with SEND achieve well. This is because the SENCo tracks each pupil individually and regularly reviews planned intervention. The SENCo provides regular training for teachers and teaching assistants so that pupils with SEND get effective support with their learning.
p.7
Early years provision Good
Most children in the early years join the school with levels of development well below those typical for their age. In 2018, the proportion of children who achieved a good level of development was only slightly lower than the national average. This indicates strong progress from their starting points. Children have a good start to their education. Relationships between adults and children in Reception are strong. As a result, children have positive attitudes to their learning. They behave well and engage effectively with the activities planned for them. The early years team has high aspirations for all children to achieve well. Staff know the children well and are kind and nurturing. As a result, children are happy and confident to explore and investigate the many learning opportunities planned for them. The early years is well led and managed. The high-quality training that staff receive enables them to provide exciting learning opportunities that capture children’s
p.7
Early years provision Good
imagination. Leaders’ evaluation of the early years provision is accurate. Leaders have implemented robust systems for tracking children’s progress in Reception. As a result, teachers plan effectively for the needs of individuals, and most children make good progress. However, the most able children are not always sufficiently challenged. Children enjoy learning and playing independently. They demonstrate good collaboration and communication skills. Inspectors observed children playing confidently in the ‘garden centre’ role-play area. Children took on the roles of shopkeeper and customer, and used their knowledge, developed in mathematics, to buy seeds and flowers. The learning environment is bright and stimulating. Resources are well organised and well cared for. The classroom spaces are arranged into themed areas that offer interesting activities, for example construction toys, painting, and opportunities for
p.7
Early years provision Good
physical development. There are designated areas where children are able to enjoy and develop their skills in reading, writing and mathematics. Safeguarding and the welfare of children in the early years is effective. All staff receive regular training and have a clear understanding of the most recent safeguarding information. All adults are vigilant and know how to identify safeguarding concerns.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Website www.stmarks.brighton-hove.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Email address janefendley@stmarks.brighton-hove.sch.uk
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 30 September to 1 October 2015
p.8
Information about this school
St Mark’s is a smaller-than-average sized primary school. Most pupils are White British. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is much higher than the national average. The proportion of pupils with SEND is much higher than the national average. The proportion with education, health and care plans is also much higher than the national average. Almost half of the pupils in the school are disadvantaged and supported by the pupil premium funding. This proportion is much higher than the national average. The school is part of a city centre partnership and, through this, receives support from Roedean school.
p.8
Information about this inspection
Jointly with senior leaders, inspectors observed learning in all classes and evaluated pupils’ work in a range of subjects. Inspectors listened to a group of pupils read and reviewed the school’s assessment information. Inspectors spoke to pupils in lessons, met formally with a group of pupils and spoke to pupils at breaktime to gather their views on the school. The inspection team reviewed a range of the school’s documents and policies, including behaviour and attendance information, records of visits carried out by the local authority, minutes of the governing body’s meetings and documentation relating to the safeguarding of pupils. The lead inspector met with representatives of the governing body. Members of the inspection team held meetings with a range of middle leaders. Inspectors considered five responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire. Inspectors spoke to parents at the start of the school day and considered the 14
p.9
Information about this inspection
responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. Inspectors also considered the responses to a parent survey conducted on behalf of the school.
p.9
Inspection team
Luisa Gould, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.9
Inspection team
Claire Martin-O’Donoghue Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.10
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.10
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.10
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion