Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Thomas More Catholic School
Summary
Carolyn Dickinson (lead), James Whiting, Jenny Gaylor
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
1 May 2019
- Inspectors verified
Carolyn Dickinson, James Whiting, Jenny Gaylor
- 16 to 19 study programmes verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Requires improvement
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CR8 2XP
- Name on report verified
Thomas More Catholic School
- URN verified
101821
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallGood
- 16 to 19 study programmesRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders have engendered a strong ethos of high expectations for pupils’ behaviour and academic progress. p.3
- The recently appointed headteacher, well supported by governors and leaders, has a strong and clear vision for the school. p.3
- Members communicate well as a team to ensure that pupils are safe and thriving. p.5
- Leaders play a full role in securing effective teaching and pupils’ good progress. p.1
- This support is particularly effective in helping pupils with SEND to make good progress. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve provision in the sixth form by ensuring that: – attendance improves rapidly – teachers use assessment information to plan work that challenges students to make strong progress, particularly the most able students. p.2
- Build on leaders’ current work with disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND so that: – these pupils attend school as regularly as other pupils – disadvantaged pupils’ progress and attainment by the end of Year 11 match those of their non-disadvantaged peers nationally – pupils with SEND make strong progress and are helped to catch up with their peers. p.2
- Over the past two years, students’ progress in academic courses has been below average. p.6
- Progress in applied courses has varied from below average, in 2017, to average, in 2018. p.6
- Current students make better progress than in previous years, in both academic and applied courses. p.6
- The quality of teaching is improving in the sixth form. p.6
- It requires further improvement to be good. p.6
- Teaching does not routinely promote good progress, particularly for the most able students. p.6
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Curriculum21
“Training is well planned and implemented.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,413
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Thomas More Catholic School Russell Hill Road, Purley, Surrey CR8 2XP
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders and governors have successfully created a positive and aspirational culture that staff and pupils have embraced. The recently appointed headteacher has led this improvement with determination. The quality of teaching is good. Teachers use their subject knowledge effectively to engage pupils in their learning. Subject leadership is a strength. Leaders play a full role in securing effective teaching and pupils’ good progress. Well-identified professional development for staff has resulted in good teaching and good leadership. Typically, standards are high. Pupils’ progress and attainment, particularly in mathematics and English, by the end of Year 11 are above the national averages. However, disadvantaged pupils do not attain as well as other pupils nationally. This reflects below average progress from their starting points. The curriculum is broad and balanced. Leaders ensure that pupils benefit from learning in a
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
wide range of subjects. The curriculum for personal development is effectively delivered. Careers information and guidance are well developed. Pupils receive timely and impartial advice that guides their next steps successfully. As a result, pupils stay in education, employment or training. Pupils respond well to teachers’ high expectations. They conduct themselves well, and work hard in lessons. An atmosphere of respect and courtesy is evident through the school. Pupils are safe in school. Safeguarding is effective. Staff know pupils and their needs. Pupils are well looked after. Disadvantaged pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are well supported. However, some do not attend school as often as they should. This affects their progress. The sixth form requires improvement. It has strengths, but outcomes on academic courses are variable. Teaching does not routinely
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
ensure that students, especially the most able, make the progress of which they are capable. Attendance is too low, particularly in Year 13.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve provision in the sixth form by ensuring that: – attendance improves rapidly – teachers use assessment information to plan work that challenges students to make strong progress, particularly the most able students.
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Build on leaders’ current work with disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND so that: – these pupils attend school as regularly as other pupils – disadvantaged pupils’ progress and attainment by the end of Year 11 match those of their non-disadvantaged peers nationally – pupils with SEND make strong progress and are helped to catch up with their peers.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
The recently appointed headteacher, well supported by governors and leaders, has a strong and clear vision for the school. Leaders have a realistic understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They understand the priorities for improvement and have strong capacity to further improve the school. Leaders have engendered a strong ethos of high expectations for pupils’ behaviour and academic progress. Consequently, the school provides a calm and orderly environment for learning. Leaders have established a culture where teachers reflect upon and improve their teaching. Leaders offer support when it is required. Training is well planned and implemented. It supports newly and recently qualified staff and has resulted in stronger teaching from established staff. As a result, senior leaders have ensured that good-quality teaching is the norm in this school. The quality of subject leadership across the school is strong. A number of heads of
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
department are relatively new to their posts. They are supported by more experienced senior leaders. Subject leaders have a clear understanding of their department’s strengths and areas for improvement. They monitor and evaluate the pupils’ progress and take swift action to support any pupils who are falling behind. Leaders ensure that the curriculum matches the pupils’ interests. The school offers a range of GCSE courses, and includes vocational options, such as the BTEC in health and social care. Opportunities for learning and experiences beyond the taught curriculum are many and varied. For example, pupils from Year 9 and Year 10 visit Oxford University to raise their aspirations. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is effectively promoted through the school’s values, which are ‘to care, to learn, (and) to achieve’. Pupils demonstrate secure understanding of British values, including, for example, mutual respect and
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
individual liberty. They relish opportunities to develop their leadership skills, for example through participation in Combined Cadet Force activities. Additional funding for disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND is used appropriately. Leaders understand pupils’ needs well. Nonetheless, the impact of this funding on pupils’ academic progress is not routinely strong over time. Some make very good progress, others less so. Actions taken are effective to support those with below average levels of literacy and numeracy to catch up by the end of Year 7. Parents and carers who shared their views about the school using Ofsted’s online parent survey were generally positive about the school and its work.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governance of the school is effective. Governors are kept well informed by senior leaders and have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement. Relationships are positive, constructive and fully supportive of the actions taken by the headteacher. Governors visit the school regularly to support of the school’s development priorities, and to fulfil their responsibilities for pupils’ safeguarding. Governors hold senior leaders to account for the educational provision and performance of the school and its leaders. They have clear and effective structures in place to support and challenge leaders. Systems are thorough. This means that questions do not go unanswered, and actions are undertaken, as agreed.
p.3
Safeguarding
Arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Records of who is safe to work with pupils are completed and well maintained. All necessary checks are made when recruiting staff to work with pupils. Leaders are aware of the risks which pupils face, including outside school. Staff are trained to identify potential risks to pupils. This includes risks of drug- and gang-related crime, child sexual exploitation, extremism and radicalisation. Staff take the time to know pupils well, and provide for their safety and well-being effectively. They are clear about how to report their concerns, should any arise. Senior leaders take appropriate steps when they have concerns about a pupil’s welfare. They contact external agencies when required, and follow up their concerns to check that agreed actions have been taken. Pupils said they feel safe and trust staff to support them when they need help. Pupils know who to go to if they have a problem. Pupils said that the support they are given
p.4
Safeguarding
is one of the things they most value about their school.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Leaders’ actions since the last inspection have greatly improved the quality of teaching. As a result, pupils benefit from good teaching across a range of subjects and year groups, including in art, French, English and mathematics. Teachers use their good subject knowledge to engage pupils in challenging and interesting activities. This means that pupils make good progress. Leaders are aware that the quality of teaching in geography, history and science is not as routinely strong as it is in other subjects. Senior leaders have strengthened subject leadership to secure more consistency in these areas. An effective professional development programme for teachers means that the quality of teaching in geography, history and science is improving. Throughout the school, the environment is conducive to learning. Pupils work hard and respond well to teachers’ high expectations of their behaviour and engagement.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Consequently, time in lessons is used productively. Leaders ensure that pupils’ progress is carefully monitored, and appropriate support is put in place to help pupils, where necessary. Consequently, pupils’ work has improved. Teachers use assessment information about pupils’ learning well to set work that matches their needs. As a result, pupils of all abilities learn effectively. Teachers are skilled at asking questions to check pupils’ understanding. Typically, teachers give effective feedback in lessons and in pupils’ books. As a result, pupils know what they have done well and what they need to do to improve. Additional adults in classrooms provide good-quality support for teachers and pupils. They are active in lessons in ensuring that pupils stay on task. They prompt pupils where needed and know when to step back and let the pupils do the work. This support is particularly effective in helping pupils with SEND to make good progress.
p.4
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. The atmosphere in the school is harmonious because staff work tirelessly to foster positive relationships with and between pupils. As a result, pupils are safe and well cared for. If bullying does happen, pupils know whom to go to report concerns. They said that leaders sort out any problems swiftly and effectively. Pupils know how to keep themselves safe, including when online. The pastoral team works effectively to support pupils’ welfare. Members communicate well as a team to ensure that pupils are safe and thriving. The team reviews pupils’ progress frequently, so that pupils receive timely intervention when needed. Vulnerable pupils are particularly well cared for. Pupils are proud of their school and are smart in their appearance. They take pride in their work, and presentation is of a high standard. Pupils show respect to each other
p.5
Personal development and welfare
and to adults. As one pupil said, ‘pupils here are warm-hearted enough to look out for each other’. This chimed with inspectors’ views. Pupils said that staff are approachable and considerate of pupils’ emotional and physical well-being. The support services provided by leaders are wide ranging and meet pupils’ needs. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is a strength of the curriculum. Their learning, including through the Catholic ethos and the personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) curriculum, explores a range of issues. This helps pupils to develop a mature approach to relationships, responsibilities and to their role in modern Britain. A very small number of pupils are educated off-site in alternative provision. Leaders match placements closely to pupils’ social, emotional and learning needs. Pupils’ behaviour, attendance and progress are monitored closely.
p.5
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. The headteacher and leaders set high expectations. As a result, pupils behave well in lessons and around the school. Behaviour is typically calm and considerate, and disruption to learning is rare. When it does occur, it is well managed. Pupils are well-mannered, courteous and respectful when speaking to staff and visitors. This contributes strongly to the calm and orderly environment in school. Leaders and teachers’ high expectations of behaviour have resulted in higher than average levels of exclusions. However, there is a downward trend in the number of permanent and fixed-term exclusions, which reflects improved behaviour. Pupils attend school regularly. Nevertheless, despite leaders’ efforts, persistence absence for disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND remains above the national average.
p.5
Outcomes for pupils Good
Pupils’ progress and attainment in 2018, across the curriculum, were in line with the national averages. In English and mathematics, attainment and progress of Year 11 pupils were above the national averages. GCSE results in 2018 showed that progress of disadvantaged pupils was below that of other pupils nationally. Evidence from pupils’ work and the school’s assessment information of current pupils show that disadvantaged pupils make good progress. This is because leaders’ use of the additional funding successfully helps these pupils to learn well. In 2017 and 2018, pupils’ progress in geography was weak. As a result of professional development for teachers, and improved subject leadership, work in pupils’ books shows that progress is improving. Most-able pupils are given suitable work to challenge them, and they are able to attempt more difficult tasks. For example, in mathematics, pupils wrestle with harder
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
concepts that deepen their understanding. As a result, most-able pupils make good progress. Currently, the progress of pupils with SEND is improving, and is closer to average than in the past. Leaders identify the needs of this group of pupils much better than in the past, and there is good support to help them to engage in learning. Pupils who need to catch up in English and mathematics make good progress throughout Year 7 as a result of the additional help that they receive. Pupils are well prepared for the future. Effective support and guidance help pupils to secure appropriate places for their next steps in education, work or training.
p.6
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
Over the past two years, students’ progress in academic courses has been below average. Progress in applied courses has varied from below average, in 2017, to average, in 2018. Current students make better progress than in previous years, in both academic and applied courses. The quality of teaching is improving in the sixth form. It requires further improvement to be good. Teaching does not routinely promote good progress, particularly for the most able students. Leaders have organised professional development to support teachers in planning work to challenge students effectively, and increase rates of progress. As a result, there are signs of improving challenge for students. The provision for students who have not gained suitable English and mathematics qualifications prior to joining the sixth form is not effective. Some students need to resit examinations several times before they complete their sixth-form studies. Not all
p.6
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
are successful. Students’ attendance is poor, particularly in Year 13. This is because leaders do not chase up absences with the rigour that they do in key stages 3 and 4. Students’ absence is a major factor in underachievement. There is good practice in A-level mathematics, sociology, religious education, biology and physics. Good relationships between students and teachers, detailed subject knowledge and effective questioning stimulate students’ learning and progress. In these subjects, teachers enable students to work independently and develop a good range of study skills. Students’ work is well organised, complete and contains good- quality written feedback about how to improve their work. Teachers make good use of exemplar materials to model effective planning and writing of assignments. Students benefit from a wider curriculum that prepares them well for life beyond school. Work experience is tailored to students’ career aspirations. Students are
p.7
16 to 19 study programmes Requires improvement
expected and encouraged to play a visible part in the life of the school. For example, they act as student ambassadors and mentors to younger pupils. Strong, impartial careers advice helps students to choose appropriate courses for their sixth-form study. As a result, retention in the sixth form has started to improve. There are strong links with universities, employers and apprenticeship providers. Work with high-quality companies supports students and increases their aspirations. In almost all cases, students move on to their choice of higher education, training or employment.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Gender of pupils in 16 to 19 study programmes Mixed
p.8
School details
Of which, number on roll in 16 to 19 study programmes Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Date of previous inspection 13–14 December 2016
p.8
Information about this school
The school is smaller than the average-sized secondary school. The headteacher has been in post since September 2018. The designated religious character of the school is Roman Catholic. The school was inspected under section 48 of the Education Act 2005 on 21–22 November 2017. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is higher than the national average. The proportion of pupils with SEND is higher than the national average. The proportion of pupils with an education, health and care plan is below the national average. The school uses alternative provision for a small number of pupils at Sporting Chances, Carshalton, and Saffron Valley Collegiate, KS4 North.
p.8
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed a range of teaching and learning throughout the school. Ins pectors met with the headteacher, senior leaders, middle leaders and other members of staff. The lead inspector met with members of the governing body and representatives from the local authority. Ins pectors looked at samples of pupils’ work across a broad range of subjects. Inspectors met with groups of pupils, and spoke to others in lessons and during breaktimes. Inspectors observed pupils’ conduct throughout the school day and as they left at the end of the school day. Insp ectors examined a range of the school’s documentation, such as the school’s self- evaluation document and development plan, minutes of governing body meetings, assessment information, the pupil premium strategy, attendance, bullying and behaviour records, and safeguarding information. Inspectors analysed the 16 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for parents (Parent
p.10
Information about this inspection
View). They also considered the 27 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire. There were no responses to Ofsted’s pupil questionnaire.
p.10
Inspection team
Carolyn Dickinson, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
James Whiting Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion