Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

The Teaching & Learning Group Limited

Inspected 18 Apr 2019 · published 28 May 2019 · URN 1237100

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Philip Elliott

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 Apr 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Philip Elliott

  • Postcode verified

    WC2R 0RG

  • Name on report verified

    The Teaching and Learning Group

  • URN verified

    1237100

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−5Mixedmore positive than 22% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelysafepositiveindependentwell-plannedmake good progressclear
Criticismnot alwaysconcernsnot yetslowat riskweaknessestoo manydisruption

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,546
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

The Teaching and Learning Group Monitoring visit report

p.1

Name of lead inspector: Philip Elliott, Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: 456–459 Strand London WC2R 0RG Monitoring visit: The Teaching and Learning Group, 17-18 April 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The Teaching and Learning Group is an independent learning provider that began delivering apprenticeships for non-levy funded programmes in September 2018 in business administration, retail and digital marketing, accounting and finance, and leadership and management. At the time of the monitoring visit, the company provides training for 24 apprentices studying mainly at level 3, with a small number of apprentices on levels 2 and 5. All apprentices are on standards programmes and all but one are over 19.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers have not ensured that apprentices receive consistently effective reviews and good, regular and well-planned off-the-job training. Managers have recently made significant changes to staffing, resulting in disruption to current apprentices’ training. Although leaders and managers recognised that standards of delivery and assessment on some programmes did not enable apprentices to make good progress and took remedial action, this has not yet enabled all apprentices to catch up on lost learning. As a result, the majority of apprentices make slow progress. Leaders, managers and assessors do not have sufficient oversight of off-the-job training. Managers do not ensure that employers provide all apprentices with their full entitlement to off-the-job training. Consequently, not all apprentices are provided with enough off-the-job training to enable them to make good progress. Leaders and managers do not use information about apprentices’ performance well

p.2

Insufficient progress

enough to understand the progress they make. Data used by managers to identify apprentices at risk of failing are not sharp enough to promote rapid intervention. For Monitoring visit: The Teaching and Learning Group, 17-18 April 2019 example, apprentices who have submitted no, or very little, work in several months do not appear on the managers’ risk register. Managers do not gather information about apprentices’ attendance at training sessions, so they do not know if attendance is improving or deteriorating. Managers’ improvement strategies do not always use current, accurate data to improve the progress of apprentices. Staff recruit and match apprentices to employers and settings with integrity. Experienced and skilled staff identify apprentices’ skills and interests accurately before they start a programme, and match them to employers’ needs. Managers use their extensive contacts effectively to provide employers with the apprentices they

p.2

Insufficient progress

need and, as a result, all apprentices stay in learning. Leaders and managers have recently made improvements to their quality assurance of the apprenticeship programme and identify the necessary areas for improvement. They have made progress in critical areas such as developing apprentices’ understanding of how to stay safe. The detailed quality improvement plan sets out clear actions for improvement. The internal quality assurance team accurately assesses the strengths and weaknesses of teaching and assessment sessions. However, actions taken have yet to achieve the intended impact on the progress of all apprentices. Leaders and managers have taken decisive action to address staff’s underperformance by providing additional training for assessors and restructuring the senior leadership team. This has created clear lines of accountability. Specialist managers and new assessors have a sharper focus on their apprentices’ progress.

p.3

Insufficient progress

For example, as a result of staff absence and replacement, many apprentices’ reviews were delayed or cancelled but recent staffing changes have enabled more frequent reviews and the backlog is reducing.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Too many apprentices make slow progress. Just over half of all apprentices are behind target for achievement. A very small minority of apprentices have not been visited at work by an assessor within the last year. A minority of business administration apprentices have either submitted very little or no work and therefore have had limited or no feedback from their assessors. Recruitment consultant apprentices have been on programme for five months and have had no feedback and no work marked due to staff absences and changes to assessors. Consequently, these apprentices have little understanding of whether they are making progress or if their work meets the required standards. Monitoring visit: The Teaching and Learning Group, 17-18 April 2019 Apprentices do not always have a sufficiently clear understanding of the apprenticeship standards and what is required of them, and many are not able to describe their new knowledge and skills relating to their apprenticeship. This slows

p.3

Insufficient progress

progress towards their apprenticeship completion. Employers are not sufficiently involved in planning the apprentices’ programme, and are therefore not able to plan the apprentices’ workload to align with the apprenticeship standards. For example, in some cases employers are unfamiliar with their apprentices’ training programmes or are not adequately involved in the review meetings with the tutor. Tutors and assessors do not provide apprentices with good enough support to develop their English and mathematics skills. A significant minority of apprentices require support and for too many apprentices this is not yet in place. As a result, apprentices do not always systematically develop the essential mathematics and English skills they need to progress in their work roles. The large majority of apprentices are placed with appropriate and supportive employers who enable them to develop their skills during on-the-job training that

p.4

Insufficient progress

builds their confidence. For example, management apprentices develop their use of positive body language in meetings so that they can maintain good working relationships with staff. Apprentices speak highly of the support they receive from their employers and how this enables them to gain confidence, and increase competence, in carrying out their work roles. Apprentices enjoy their work and increase their confidence by being involved in the schemes such as ‘apprentice of the month’. An independent panel of judges provides positive feedback which helps apprentices nominated for the award to develop confidence and improve their work and communication.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Safeguarding arrangements are thorough and effective in ensuring that learners are safe. Learners are taught how to do risk assessments for different types of work to keep them safe. For example, apprentices who work in environments such as estate agencies know how to stay safe when working alone with clients. Leaders have established a safeguarding focus group that meets regularly and ensures that staff are kept fully up-to-date with their responsibilities. Safeguarding policies and procedures, including those related to the ‘Prevent’ duty, are regularly reviewed. Staff understand what to do if they have any concerns about their apprentices relating to radicalisation or safeguarding. Staff benefit from extensive training and are well-informed about safeguarding, aspects of equality and diversity and the relevance of British values to their apprentices. Monitoring visit: The Teaching and Learning Group, 17-18 April 2019

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers ensure that their staff are suitable to work with apprentices. All staff have current and relevant Disclosure and Barring Service checks. The safeguarding manager has strong links with external safeguarding partners and uses them effectively to refer apprentices where necessary. As a result, apprentices say they feel safe. Monitoring visit: The Teaching and Learning Group, 17-18 April 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to

p.5

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.6

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.6

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.6

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion