Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
Aileen King (lead), Elizabeth Moore
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
30 Apr 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Aileen King, Elizabeth Moore
- Postcode verified
NG2 7GX
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Leaders have developed a strong and effective culture of safeguarding. p.3
- The environment was well planned and effectively used to support learning. p.4
- Pupils understand that the school provides a climate in which pupils are nurtured and encouraged to thrive. p.1
- Pupils leave Year 6 very well prepared for the next stage of education. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, assessment of pupils’ understanding is inconsistent, and tasks are not always well matched to the abilities of the children, particularly for the most able pupils. p.4
- You explained that a minority of children had entered Reception with a limited vocabulary and with weaknesses in sentence construction. p.4
- Errors in writing in other curriculum areas are not always addressed and, consequently, the pace of some pupils’ learning is not as quick as it could be. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance21
“Leaders have developed a strong and effective culture of safeguarding.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,888
- longer than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Ms Lynda Noble Headteacher Heymann Primary and Nursery School Waddington Drive Wilford Hill West Bridgford Nottingham Nottinghamshire NG2 7GX
p.1
Following my visit to the school on 30 April 2019 with Aileen King, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the predecessor school was judged to be good in July 2016, prior to the school becoming an academy in September 2016.
p.1
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. The school works effectively within the Equals Trust (the trust), of which it became a member in September 2016. There has been effective collaboration on school improvement programmes. Staff and governors have opportunities to work with other schools to exchange good practice.
p.1
Pupils are happy to come to school. They are keen to participate in such activities as learning how to look after chickens and raise money for the school from the sale of eggs. They appreciate the wide range of sports activities and clubs available. There are opportunities for pupils to participate in the smooth running of the school by volunteering to become members of the school council. The ‘dustpan and brush award’ enthuses pupils to keep their classrooms and the school environment tidy.
p.1
Pupils are proud of their school. They get on well together and have confidence in the ‘zero tolerance’ culture. They know that concerns are dealt with well. Pupils understand that the school provides a climate in which pupils are nurtured and encouraged to thrive. A typical comment was, ‘This is like a home to me.’
p.1
Pupils are motivated learners. They enjoy work that is challenging. They listen attentively to adults and they work well with each other. Classrooms are stimulating and engaging places to learn. Teachers provide displays which support pupils’ learning effectively. In classrooms and around the school, pupils’ work is celebrated and presented to a high standard and this is a seamless link between both school sites.
p.1
Parents and carers speak highly of your leadership and the care shown by staff. They are pleased with the range of opportunities available. They value participating in their children’s learning. Parents appreciate the inclusivity that is the school community. A typical comment was ‘Pupils do get a wide-ranging experience. There is care taken. I feel the teachers know the children.’
p.2
The school curriculum is carefully planned to develop pupils as caring, compassionate and thoughtful members of society. Staff teach pupils to respect and value differences, including cultures and religions. Leaders have worked effectively on developing the ‘Heymann highway’ culture of being a ‘self-manager, a team worker, a resilient thinker, an investigator and a creative thinker’ to ensure that pupils have a can-do attitude to learning.
p.2
You and your staff provide a wide range of interesting experiences: visits to museums, a trip for the older pupils to the Houses of Parliament, visitors in school and workshops. Annual residential trips for pupils in Years 4 and 6 help to build pupils’ confidence and resilience. They enjoy taking part in the many inter-school events and competitions. Pupils leave Year 6 very well prepared for the next stage of education.
p.2
Leaders and staff place a strong emphasis on staff development. Your enthusiastic staff work collaboratively within school and with other professionals in schools in the trust and more widely, to develop their expertise. More-experienced leaders nurture new subject leaders to ensure that their actions lead to improvements. Leaders track pupils’ achievement through regular discussions with teachers. Together, you have identified the key priorities for improvement and have ensured that staff have a higher expectation of what pupils can achieve in lessons and over time. When pupils need to catch up, additional support is provided quickly.
p.2
Leaders of mathematics and English check the impact of initiatives, some of which are new or are in the process of being embedded. However, this is not done precisely enough to make sure that it is highly accurate across the school. Leaders need to have a clear focus for bringing about improvements in writing and mathematics.
p.2
During our tour of all key stages, we noted that, in some classes, teachers were not effectively designing tasks to ensure that the most able pupils, including the most able disadvantaged pupils, made the progress of which they are capable in writing and mathematics. Pupils’ work showed that some tasks did not challenge these pupils sufficiently. There remains work to be done on ensuring that initiatives in writing and mathematics are effective.
p.2
The governing body has a wide range of skills which they keep up to date through regular training. They understand the importance of holding leaders to account and have a system in place to ensure that leaders are challenged. They know the school well and are keen for pupils’ progress to improve still further, including for the most able pupils in mathematics and writing. The governing body shares your vision to provide an engaging curriculum. Governors visit the school regularly as part of their responsibility to hold leaders to account. They do not consistently focus their visits on the school’s work to address the improvement priorities, however.
p.2
Leaders place a high priority on keeping pupils safe and have made sure that safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Records are detailed, well organised and kept securely. Recruitment procedures are followed and are thorough. Training is up to date. Safeguarding information is displayed around the school. As a result, staff have up-to-date knowledge of safeguarding. This keeps them alert to risks and attentive to procedures.
p.3
Leaders have developed a strong and effective culture of safeguarding. Staff make timely referrals of concerns. You are tenacious in your approach to ensuring strong pastoral and multi-agency support for vulnerable pupils and their families.
p.3
The curriculum has been planned to include opportunities for pupils to learn how to keep themselves safe in the wider community. Pupils are confident about how to keep themselves safe online. They feel safe and secure in school. They know they should speak to a trusted adult if they feel worried. Pupils are very confident that adults will listen to any concerns that they have.
p.3
Inspection findings
During the inspection, the quality of teaching and learning of writing was observed in all key stages. Published information in 2018 shows that at the end of key stage 2 the proportion of disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard was below the national average, and that the proportion of the most able pupils reaching the higher standard in writing was below the national average. At the end of key stage 1, the proportion of disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected level was below the national average and the proportion of the most able pupils working at greater depth was below the national average. Leaders have introduced a consistent approach to teaching writing, with a greater emphasis on cross-curricular links to improve the regularity and the range and purpose for writing. Pupils edit and improve their own and other pupils’ writing. In key stages 1 and 2, pupils read engaging texts to develop their
p.3
Inspection findings
vocabulary and their enthusiasm to write. For example, in key stage 2, pupils had to plan a leaflet, persuading adults not to drink and drive. In key stage 1, as a result of adults using a range of stimuli, pupils were generating complex sentences related to castles and knights. Pupils’ workbooks show that they write with increasing regularity, at length and for a range of different purposes. A wide range of vocabulary is used to make writing more interesting to read. Leaders have introduced schemes and resources to improve spelling and language enrichment. Skills in spelling, punctuation and grammar are taught regularly and systematically to give structure to writing and to make it more effective. However, accuracy is not consistent. Errors in writing in other curriculum areas are not always addressed and, consequently, the pace of some pupils’ learning is not as quick as it could be. A visit to the Nursery showed that routines for effective learning in numeracy and
p.3
Inspection findings
writing were being established. The environment was well planned and effectively used to support learning. You explained that a minority of children had entered Reception with a limited vocabulary and with weaknesses in sentence construction. During an observation in the class, children were seen to be using phonic knowledge effectively to write simple sentences and to construct extended pieces of writing. Adults were using an appropriate range of resources and teaching methods to effectively support groups of children with their learning. Leaders have taken steps to improve the quality of handwriting and of the presentation of pupils’ work in books. However, there is inconsistency in pupils’ style and some pupils’ handwriting is difficult to read and not well formed. The presentational quality of written work is not consistently high. In mathematics, published information in 2018 shows that by the end of key
p.4
Inspection findings
stage 1 the proportion of disadvantaged pupils reaching the expected standard was below the national average and that the proportion of the most able pupils working at greater depth was below the national average. At the end of key stage 2, the progress of all pupils was less than in either reading or writing. Leaders have implemented structured changes to the teaching of mathematics. Attention has been directed towards deepening and broadening pupils’ knowledge and understanding of mathematical processes to solve problems of increasing complexity. Staff plan frequent opportunities for pupils to practise fluency in number, including written calculations and understanding of place value. In Reception, for example, adults were using questioning and practical activities to challenge children’s deeper understanding of division by sharing. In key stage 1, pupils were using an appropriate range of strategies to solve fraction
p.4
Inspection findings
problems. In key stage 2, pupils were analysing problems and rationalising strategies to apply. In workbooks, there was evidence of pupils using English writing skills to explain their methods. Staff were observed using questioning skilfully to develop pupils’ reasoning skills and pupils showed a confidence when problem-solving. However, assessment of pupils’ understanding is inconsistent, and tasks are not always well matched to the abilities of the children, particularly for the most able pupils. Pupils enjoy school and value their education. Most attend regularly and whole school attendance remains consistently above the national average. Staff check pupils’ attendance and follow up absences with parents. Leaders strongly discourage term-time holidays because of their adverse impact on pupils’ learning. However, a small number of pupils are persistently absent. Published information shows that this number has risen.
p.4
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that: teachers adapt learning tasks consistently to ensure that pupils, particularly the most able, are sufficiently challenged and make stronger progress in writing and mathematics subject leaders are precise about what needs to be improved in writing and mathematics and rigorous in ensuring that improvements are made effective actions are taken to improve the attendance of pupils who are persistent absentees.
p.4
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Nottinghamshire County Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.5
Information about the inspection
Inspectors met with you and leaders of the senior and middle leadership teams. They met with leaders with responsibility for English and mathematics.
p.5
Information about the inspection
Inspectors observed learning in the majority of classes, including the Nursery class, all of which were carried out jointly with a member of the senior leadership team. Inspectors met with eight pupils from Year 6 to talk about their learning and experiences in school and they spoke with pupils informally during lessons. A playtime and assembly were observed.
p.5
Information about the inspection
Inspectors evaluated the school’s documentation about pupils’ achievement and planning for improvement. In addition, inspectors checked those documents relating to safeguarding, behaviour, attendance, minutes from governing body meetings and information available on the school’s website.
p.5
Information about the inspection
I took account of the 64 responses to Ofsted’s online survey for pupils, the 39 responses to the staff questionnaire and 133 responses to Parent View, the Ofsted online questionnaire, including free-text responses. I met with two governors, including the chair of the governing body, the chief executive of the Equals Trust and the school improvement partner for the Equals Trust.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion