Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Manatec Limited

Inspected 30 Apr 2019 · published 23 May 2019 · URN 1278572

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steve Hunsley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    30 Apr 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Steve Hunsley

  • Postcode verified

    DN37 9TT

  • Name on report verified

    Manatec Limited

  • URN verified

    1278572

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
13
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
7 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%About the inspection 99%

Full report text

Name of lead inspector: Steve Hunsley, HMI

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address:

The Innovation Centre Innovation Way Grimsby DN37 9TT Monitoring visit: Manatec Limited, 29–30 April 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the ‘Further education and skills inspection handbook’, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Manatec was formed in 1983 and is based in Grimsby. It began offering employer and levy-funded apprenticeships in May 2017. The range of programmes includes standards-based apprenticeships for adult care workers, customer service practitioners and team leader/supervisors, and a small number of framework apprenticeships in health and social care leadership and business administration. Manatec currently has around 550 apprentices. Just over a third of them follow programmes at level 2. Almost all apprentices are above 19 years of age. Manatec delivers all its provision in care home settings.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders and managers have not ensured that the apprenticeships they offer meet the requirements of apprentices or of their employers. A high proportion of apprentices have a poor learning experience, do not gain new knowledge, skills or behaviours or are unaware that they are completing an apprenticeship programme.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Too many apprentices and their employers are unsure about the requirements and principles of an apprenticeship. Leaders do not ensure that learning consultants plan all elements of an apprenticeship well enough. Employers are not routinely involved and, consequently, too many apprentices do not receive their entitlement to off-the- job training. This means that, for too many apprentices, the provider does not meet the principles of an apprenticeship.

p.2

Insufficient progress

While leaders and managers have determined a number of strengths and weaknesses as part of their evaluation and self-assessment, they underestimate the severity of many of the weaknesses. Consequently, they have been too slow to ensure that employers and apprentices have good information about the programmes offered and the quality of the training that apprentices receive. Monitoring visit: Manatec Limited, 29–30 April 2019 Leaders do not have a strong enough relationship with employers. Most employers and their staff do not participate in the planning of apprentices’ programmes or in reviewing the progress that apprentices make. Too many employers do not have a good enough understanding of an apprenticeship programme and the elements involved. Managers and learning consultants do not take effective action to overcome employers’ lack of involvement when visiting apprentices. Consequently, employers’ insufficient support for their apprentices persists.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders, managers and employers do not ensure that all apprentices are suitable for an apprenticeship. In many settings, apprentices already have the skills, knowledge and behaviours expected in their job roles, or are existing members of staff. Careers advice and guidance are minimal. Many apprentices and employers seek only the mandatory qualifications that employees need to work in the care sector.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Learning consultants are well qualified for, and experienced in, the care sector. Employers value their positive relationships with Manatec’s learning consultants.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Leaders, managers and learning consultants have not worked effectively with employers to put in place relevant training programmes for apprentices. They do not ensure that apprentices receive their entitlement to off-the-job training. Most apprentices are unaware of this entitlement, and almost all of them complete their training in their own time. Too often, employers do not permit apprentices to complete their training while at work, because of high workloads or shift work. The exceptions are when learning consultants visit or when apprentices take additional qualifications, such as manual handling and epilepsy awareness training. Consequently, too many apprentices make slow progress towards completing the expected outcomes of their apprenticeship.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Most apprentices are unaware of how they will be assessed at the end of their programmes. Managers and learning consultants do not monitor or evaluate apprentices’ progress well enough. Learning consultants do not use information about apprentices’ starting points or their prior knowledge. As a result, they do not plan and set meaningful milestones for apprentices that meet their individual needs or the requirements of their job roles.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Managers have been slow to take the required actions to improve the performance of learning consultants. They have introduced an appropriate quality assurance process that includes observations of teaching and learning. However, the process is limited to the evaluation of assessment practice. Managers do not effectively evaluate the quality of teaching and learning. They fail to identify any specific actions Monitoring visit: Manatec Limited, 29–30 April 2019 to help learning consultants improve their craft of teaching or improve their coaching skills. Consequently, managers’ actions to improve the quality of the provision do not have sufficient impact on the progress that apprentices make or on the quality of training that they receive.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Too few apprentices improve their English and mathematical skills beyond the minimum requirements of the apprenticeship. Learning consultants do provide effective support or ensure that apprentices study the appropriate level of English and mathematics to comply with the apprenticeship standards.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Leaders and managers have ensured that effective safeguarding arrangements are in place. Managers and staff are suitably qualified and partake in regular updating and mandatory training. Staff follow procedures well and use them effectively whenever there is a need.

p.4

Reasonable progress

Apprentices feel safe and are safe in their workplace, and they demonstrate an effective understanding of safeguarding practices. They know how to report any concerns and to whom they should report them. Learning consultants make effective checks on apprentices’ safety, health and well-being when they visit them at work.

p.4

Reasonable progress

During the induction phase of the apprenticeship, leaders, managers and learning consultants provide useful information regarding the dangers from possible radicalisation or extremist groups. Learning consultants reinforce this during assessment visits. However, apprentices are unable to recall how these issues might influence their daily lives. Monitoring visit: Manatec Limited, 29–30 April 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

Reasonable progress

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.5

Reasonable progress

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

Reasonable progress

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

Reasonable progress

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion