Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
25 Apr 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Julie Carrington
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
BH14 9HL
- Name on report verified
Courthill Infant School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Parents are overwhelmingly positive about the whole school offer and the excellent progress that their children make socially, emotionally and academically. p.2
- They receive a curriculum that is consistently demanding and interests and motivates them exceptionally well. p.2
- Teaching and timely intervention and support ensure that pupils’ learning and emotional needs are met exceptionally well. p.3
- Teachers have consistently high expectations of what pupils can achieve. p.1
- The whole school system to provide pupils with individualised support and advice to improve their writing is highly effective over time. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer (CEO) of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole. p.4
- This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,427
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Alison Carter Headteacher Courthill Infant School Courthill Road Parkstone Poole Dorset BH14 9HL
p.1
Short inspection of Courthill Infant School
Following my visit to the school on 25 April 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since your predecessor school was judged to be good in December 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of Courthill Infant School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Based on the evidence gathered during this short inspection, I am of the opinion that the school has demonstrated strong practice and marked improvement in specific areas. This may indicate that the school has improved significantly overall. Therefore, I am recommending that the school’s next inspection be a section 5 inspection.
p.1
Short inspection of Courthill Infant School
Together, you are a strong and capable leadership team. You have a deep understanding of the school’s effectiveness. You use your evaluations to keep the school improving by tackling any minor relative weaknesses as soon as they appear.
p.1
Short inspection of Courthill Infant School
Leaders at all levels are steadfast in their efforts to ensure continuous school improvement. As a result, leaders’ actions are highly successful in remedying any weaknesses because they quickly focus on the impact of their actions in key areas and keep on maintaining improvement. Governors systematically hold leaders to account with rigour and have a very strong understanding of the school’s performance. They do not shy away from providing comprehensive challenge to ensure that the school is serving its pupils consistently well.
p.1
Short inspection of Courthill Infant School
Teachers have consistently high expectations of what pupils can achieve. Teachers use their strong subject knowledge and assessment practices to ensure that teaching is closely matched to pupils’ needs. Teachers who are new to the profession or year group are supported well by senior staff to ensure that strong and consistent teaching for pupils is maintained.
p.1
Short inspection of Courthill Infant School
Since the school has opened, the proportions of pupils who leave the school with skills and knowledge in line with, and above, their age has been considerably higher than that seen nationally in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.2
Short inspection of Courthill Infant School
Pupils become engrossed in the learning challenges set for them. They show high levels of resilience in their learning because the system in place to assure this is consistently applied by teachers and pupils. As a result, pupils do not give up and learn from mistakes with confidence. Pupils say that their work is sufficiently challenging. They are proud of their achievements and their school.
p.2
Short inspection of Courthill Infant School
Pupils are polite and kind to one another. They have a strong sense of right and wrong and understand the importance of treating everyone equally. Pupils enjoy school and attend well. Parents are overwhelmingly positive about the whole school offer and the excellent progress that their children make socially, emotionally and academically.
p.2
Short inspection of Courthill Infant School
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. There is a strong culture of safeguarding across the school. Staff training, and recruitment checks, are up to date and in line with current guidance. Staff apply their training well to keep pupils safe. Safeguarding records are organised systematically and show appropriate detail. Leaders with the designated responsibility for safeguarding work with external agencies and make timely referrals when pupils are at risk of harm. Pupils say they feel safe. The school’s curriculum encourages pupils to think proactively about keeping safe and healthy. An example of this is their proactive work to improve road safety as a school council. Children benefit from a range of opportunities, such as the visiting ‘health bus’ to explore keeping safe and healthy. Pupils say that the school helps them keep physically healthy and that their emotional and mental health is nurtured.
p.2
Inspection findings
The first aspect I looked at was the quality of education on offer in Reception. Children in Reception get off to a flying start. They receive a curriculum that is consistently demanding and interests and motivates them exceptionally well. The learning environment is stimulating and interesting. The learning experiences on offer are rich and varied. Children are eager to join in. As a result, children get absorbed in their learning and maintain their concentration very well. Children show pride and excitement in their achievements. Teaching is well thought out and provides ample opportunities for children to practise their learning inside and outside. Staff interactions when children are learning independently are timely and help children progress in their learning. Teaching is precisely focused on building on what children know, can do and understand. Teachers check children’s understanding systematically. The school’s
p.2
Inspection findings
strategy to provide very specific teaching to address any gaps in children’s knowledge is effective in enabling children to catch up quickly. Children entering the school with limited language and communication skills receive specific support to develop their skills and knowledge. They are prepared well for Year 1. Another aspect I looked at was the effectiveness of the teaching of phonics and reading. The teaching of phonics and early reading is typically very strong. Pupils learn the phonic code quickly. Carefully targeted teaching meets pupils’ needs well over time. As a result, pupils can read accurately and apply their knowledge of phonics to read unknown words well. There is a strong emphasis placed on reading across the school. Consequently, those pupils who have previously struggled to read catch up. The vast majority of pupils read accurately and demonstrate a strong understanding of what they read. The school’s current
p.2
Inspection findings
strategy in Year 2 to extend pupils’ vocabulary even further is paying dividends and ensuring that pupils have a good understanding of what they read. I also examined the impact of the teaching of writing. Pupils’ achievements in writing have been high for a number of years. The whole school system to provide pupils with individualised support and advice to improve their writing is highly effective over time. Pupils take a central role in addressing the advice they are given to improve their writing. Workbooks demonstrate that pupils adhere to this system exceptionally well. As a result, by the end of key stage 1 pupils make very strong progress in their writing. Pupils write with precision and many have skills and knowledge above those which are expected for their age. Pupils present their writing consistently well and use and apply their writing skills across a range of subjects with equal rigour. The vast majority of pupils who had
p.3
Inspection findings
previously low attainment catch up. In some cases, some current Year 2 pupils who struggled academically on arrival to the school have skills and knowledge exceeding those expected for their age. A small minority of pupils in Year 1 with average ability make good progress in their writing but do not make the excellent progress that pupils make elsewhere in the school. In these instances teachers use specific interventions between lessons to help pupils to consolidate their learning. However, on occasions teachers do not adjust their teaching to address misconceptions when they arise or pupils do not apply their knowledge and application of phonics to spell accurately. Conversely, these pupils spell common exception words very well because of the acute emphasis on this aspect across the school. Another aspect I looked at was the impact of the additional funding for disadvantaged pupils and those pupils with special educational needs and/or
p.3
Inspection findings
disabilities (SEND). The leadership of funding is effective in ensuring that these pupils make strong progress over time. Teaching and timely intervention and support ensure that pupils’ learning and emotional needs are met exceptionally well. Most pupils make considerable progress from their different starting points. The final aspect I examined was pupils’ attendance. Over time, pupils’ attendance has been above the national average and few pupils have been persistently absent. However, last year too many disadvantaged pupils were absent too often. Leaders have remedied this weakness successfully. They have put new, more rigorous systems in place to track pupils’ attendance. Persistent absence has reduced for this group of pupils markedly. Nearly every pupil who suffered previously low attendance now attends well. As a result, no group of pupils is disadvantaged due to low rates of attendance.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.4
Next steps for the school
misconceptions are tackled and teaching adjusted so that all pupils in Year 1 use and apply their understanding of phonics to their writing to spell accurately.
p.4
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees and the chief executive officer (CEO) of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bournemouth, Christchurch & Poole. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
During this inspection, I spoke with you, your extended leadership team, and a group of class teachers. I held a meeting with three governors. I held a telephone discussion with the school’s ‘challenge partner’ who is employed by the trust to provide an external evaluation of the school’s work. I also met with the CEO. We made visits to lessons in every year group to observe pupils’ learning and gather their views about their learning. Together, we scrutinised pupils’ work from a range of year groups. I also listened to pupils read from Years 1 and 2. I visited the out- of-school care provision. I considered a range of documentary evidence, including: development plans; external reports of the school’s effectiveness; school performance information; evidence to exemplify how leaders support and challenge teachers to ensure that pupils make strong progress; analysis of pupils’ attendance; documented evidence
p.4
Information about the inspection
of the governing body visits to the school; and safeguarding documentation. In addition, I took account of 132 responses to the Parent View online survey and the free-text messaging service. I also took into account 19 letters from parents. In addition, the 149 responses to Ofsted’s online pupil survey and 29 responses to Ofsted’s online staff survey were analysed and considered.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion