Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 May 2019

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Brian Oppenheim (lead), Jude Wilson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Brian Oppenheim, Jude Wilson

  • Postcode verified

    SM3 8PW

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectivevery wellhigh-qualityclearconfidentpositivelyrobust
Criticismconcernsat riskconcernlowerexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionSafeguarding positive critical
  • Findings235w+14
  • Safeguarding801w+12

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,036
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
0
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 21%Safeguarding 73%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Peter Naudi Headteacher Cheam High School Chatsworth Road Cheam Sutton Surrey SM3 8PW

p.1

No formal designation inspection of Cheam High School

Following my visit with Brian Oppenheim, Her Majesty’s Inspector, to your school on 24 April 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me, and the time you took to discuss safeguarding in your school.

p.1

No formal designation inspection of Cheam High School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills was concerned about information Ofsted had gathered about the school’s approach to pupils’ welfare.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors met with senior leaders, including the headteacher and executive principal, designated safeguarding leaders and pastoral leaders. Inspectors scrutinised the single central record and other documents relating to safeguarding arrangements. The inspection team held discussions with the designated safeguarding governor, members of staff and a representative from the local authority. Inspectors spoke with pupils from all year groups, formally and informally.

p.1

Evidence

Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Evidence

the leadership and management of safeguarding are effective.

p.1

Context

Cheam High School is a larger-than-average secondary school that caters for pupils aged 11 to 18 years. The current headteacher took up post in September 2017. The school is part of the Cheam Academies Network Trust. Most pupils are White British. The proportion of pupils who are eligible for free school meals is lower than the national average. The number of pupils with an education, health and care plan is above average. Currently, no pupils attend alternative provision.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders and governors have maintained a strong culture of safeguarding. They identify pupils who are at risk using a wealth of information gathered from different sources. Leaders at all levels have the necessary expertise to decide the best approach to manage any concerns about pupils. They provide bespoke interventions and effective support for individuals. Their attention to detail is meticulous.

p.2

Safeguarding

The safeguarding team is very well organised. The senior leader with oversight of safeguarding is one of four designated safeguarding leaders. Together, they form a strong and committed team. They have a detailed understanding of the specific needs of potentially vulnerable pupils. The team communicates well with each other to ensure that concerns about pupils do not go unnoticed.

p.2

Safeguarding

Year leaders and managers work closely together to look after pupils in their care. They know individual pupils well, and are an important point of contact for pupils and parents and/or carers. Leaders and managers make sure that any information about pupils is shared appropriately and sensitively so that tutors and other relevant staff are aware of pupils’ specific needs and circumstances.

p.2

Safeguarding

High-quality staff training means that teaching and non-teaching staff know how to identify potential risks to pupils’ safety and welfare. They follow safeguarding procedures well, and share a collective responsibility for safeguarding. The school’s policy for reporting any concerns is clear and well understood by staff. Leaders update staff regularly about safeguarding developments, and deliver interactive training on safeguarding practice, including the ‘Prevent’ duty and particular issues, such as female genital mutilation.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders and staff are acutely aware of local risks which can affect pupils’ welfare. Leaders provide comprehensive training on specific risks, such as mental illness, county lines and cannabis use. This means that staff are confident to identify any signs and symptoms. The school’s internet system flags up any inappropriate words used in word processing or internet searches. Leaders have a range of appropriate actions in place to ensure that any warning signs are quickly identified and followed up.

p.2

Safeguarding

Pupils speak positively about staff who help them to overcome any problems they face. They know who to go to if they have a concern, and that staff will respect their confidentiality, wherever possible. Most pupils spoken to were clear that they felt safe and well cared for at school, physically and emotionally. Student support services are on offer to help pupils with emotional and mental health problems. Some pupils spoke highly about the support they receive for dealing with examination stress and anxiety.

p.2

Safeguarding

Leaders ensure that pupils are aware of the risks they may face outside school. ‘LIFE’ (Learning is For Ever) lessons are part of the school curriculum. Pupils learn, in an age-appropriate way, about topics such as prejudice and discrimination, human rights and extremism. Pupils value these lessons, and talked clearly of how helpful they are in giving them useful skills and knowledge. The programme is ever- changing to reflect emerging local and national issues. For example, pupils learn about online fraud and far-right extremism. Assemblies provide additional opportunities for external speakers, such as the police and local drug abuse charities, to provide further information.

p.3

Safeguarding

The school’s system for reporting and monitoring safeguarding concerns is robust. All members of staff have access to an electronic system where they log incidents, however minor and insignificant they may at first appear. Close monitoring of the system means that leaders and managers act promptly, and follow up concerns appropriately. All the information gathered helps to form a comprehensive picture, which leaders use to decide how best to support each pupil. Links with behaviour and attendance monitoring give a ‘joined-up’ picture for each pupil.

p.3

Safeguarding

Permanent exclusions have risen this year. However, there are valid reasons for this increase. Decisions to permanently exclude pupils are taken only after an extensive programme of intervention and support. Leaders follow up excluded pupils’ welfare through work with the local authority.

p.3

Safeguarding

The single central record of recruitment checks is up to date and meets requirements. Leaders ensure that safer recruitment processes are in place.

p.3

External support

The school works very effectively with external agencies to support pupils who experience challenges. Leaders have built up good relationships with local children’s services. As a result, they know exactly who to contact for different aspects of safeguarding, and to follow up any concerns. Leaders use the expertise of specialists to inform their practice, and work closely with the Safer Schools police team and nursing services. The school has links with a range of other agencies, such as bereavement services, a domestic abuse charity, and mentor schemes for particular pupils.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the chief executive officer of the trust, the regional schools commissioner and the Director of Children’s Services for Sutton. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion