Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

The Chartered Institute of Housing

Inspected 11 Apr 2019 · published 20 May 2019 · URN 1278563

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Julie Gibson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    11 Apr 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Julie Gibson

  • Postcode verified

    LE4 5NU

  • Name on report verified

    EQV (UK) Ltd

  • URN verified

    1278563

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−69Very criticalmore positive than 4% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisepositiveenjoyeffectivelyindependentaccuratelyclearsafesecure
Criticismweakslowinsufficientnot sufficientlytoo manypoorlyweaknessesdo not know

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,242
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Name of lead inspector: Julie Gibson, Ofsted Inspector

p.1

Type of provider: Independent learning provider

p.1

Address: Dock 116 75 Exploration Drive Pioneer Park Leicester LE4 5NU Monitoring visit: EQV (UK) Ltd, 10-11 April 2019

p.1

Context and focus of visit

From October 2018, Ofsted undertook to carry out monitoring visits to all newly directly funded providers of apprenticeship training provision which began to be funded from April 2017 or after by ESFA and/or the apprenticeship levy. This monitoring visit was undertaken as part of those arrangements and as outlined in the Further education and skills inspection handbook, especially the sections entitled ‘Providers newly directly funded to deliver apprenticeship training provision’ and ‘Monitoring visits’. The focus of these visits is on the themes set out below.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

EQV (UK) Ltd (EQV) is a small company based in Leicester specialising in information technology and management training. It started its business in 1992. EQV has offered directly delivered levy-funded apprenticeship provision since July 2017. EQV has 106 apprentices funded through the employer levy. Of these, 81 follow standards-based programmes for managers at level 3 and 25 at level 5. Apprentices are employed in a range of businesses in the public and private sectors.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not have sufficient oversight and understanding of their apprenticeship provision. They do not ensure that the programmes meet the principles and requirements of apprenticeships. Leaders have been slow to check how well apprentices are progressing and have not taken decisive action where performance is weak. Consequently, too many apprentices do not make appropriate progress and do not complete their apprenticeship by the expected date.

p.2

Insufficient progress

The apprenticeship programmes are poorly planned. Leaders concentrate on apprentices achieving management qualifications rather than their apprenticeship. Around half of apprentices have not received an appropriate review of their progress. Leaders have not ensured that the small minority of apprentices taking English and mathematics qualifications receive support early enough in their programme. As a result, apprentices are delayed completing their apprenticeship.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Links with employers are weak. Leaders have not ensured that employers fully support their apprentices in the workplace. Too many apprentices make slow progress or are no longer on the programme as a result of the low priority employers give to their studies.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders do not effectively monitor the quality of apprenticeships or identify areas for development accurately. They are slow to address weaknesses. Leaders have Monitoring visit: EQV (UK) Ltd, 10-11 April 2019 recently started to monitor employer involvement and the progress of the apprentices. It is too early to judge the impact of these changes.

p.2

Insufficient progress

Leaders recruit with integrity. During recruitment, leaders monitor existing skills of apprentices appropriately. As a consequence, apprentices are placed on suitable programmes to develop their existing skills further and develop new skills. For example, apprentices use new techniques when managing appraisals and their teams, with positive outcomes for apprentices and their businesses.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Assessment of off-the-job training is weak. It does not provide apprentices with a clear understanding of the quality of their work and how they can improve. Apprentices are insufficiently prepared for final assessment. Around half are late completing their end-point assessment. Leaders do not monitor assessment sufficiently well to raise the quality of provision for apprentices.

p.3

Insufficient progress

On-the-job workplace reviews are planned for all apprentices but only a few have taken place. Apprentices receive insufficient support to catch up where their progress is slow. Apprentices only have a basic understanding of how they will be assessed and do not know how to achieve higher grades.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Quality assurance arrangements require improvement. Lesson evaluations concentrate on the qualification specification and not sufficiently on the quality of teaching and learning. Actions to support improvement are not routinely identified.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Tutors are appropriately qualified and experienced. Tutors deliver training that is linked closely to the content of management qualifications. They deliver this training at the right level and pace. Group discussions are inclusive, lively and informative. As a result, apprentices enjoy learning.

p.3

Insufficient progress

The few apprentices who do not have English and mathematics qualifications are provided with relevant support to help them achieve at the required standard. It is too early to know if this is helping apprentices to achieve their qualifications.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Most apprentices develop new and relevant skills, knowledge and behaviours that they can apply in the workplace. They make useful connections between off-the-job theory sessions and how this can make a positive difference in their workplace, particularly when managing individuals and teams.

p.3

Insufficient progress

Monitoring visit: EQV (UK) Ltd, 10-11 April 2019

p.4

arrangements are in place?

Safeguarding arrangements are ineffective. Leaders do not fully understand their safeguarding duty. The designated safeguarding lead has not had appropriate training. Training for staff in safeguarding is insufficient to enhance professional practice. For example, staff do not know how to manage an incident effectively should it occur. Apprentices are not sufficiently informed how to make a disclosure and what would happen if they did.

p.4

arrangements are in place?

Leaders do not carry out sufficient background checks on staff. They do not check that staff have the right to work in the United Kingdom and workplace references are not routinely collected prior to employment.

p.4

arrangements are in place?

Leaders are not aware of their responsibilities to protect apprentices from the dangers of radicalisation and extremism. They have not had appropriate training in the ‘Prevent’ duty. Leaders do not ensure that apprentices have sufficient information about these dangers during their apprenticeship. Apprentices have a basic understanding of British values and know how to stay safe through their workplace.

p.4

arrangements are in place?

Leaders do not carry out sufficient checks to ensure that apprentices are working in an appropriate environment. There are limited routine checks on health and safety in the workplace, such as emergency evacuation procedures. Monitoring visit: EQV (UK) Ltd, 10-11 April 2019 the guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . Learner View Learner View is a website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too. To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.4

arrangements are in place?

Employer View Employer View is a website where employers can tell Ofsted what they think about their employees’ college or provider. They can also see what other employers think about them too. To find out more go to www.employerview.ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

arrangements are in place?

regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to

p.5

arrangements are in place?

the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.5

arrangements are in place?

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.5

arrangements are in place?

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion