Schools & FE · Short school inspection
St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
25 Apr 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
David Harris
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
RG10 0DR
- Name on report verified
St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Relationships between staff and pupils are excellent. p.2
- They are clearly proud of their school and enjoy the range of experiences that staff provide. p.1
- Staff, parents and carers are extremely enthusiastic about all aspects of the school’s work. p.1
- Pupils say they feel safe and enjoy their learning. p.2
- One parent commented, ‘St Nicholas is a lovely, warm and caring school.’ p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- There is some variability in the accuracy of teachers’ assessments and these do not always reflect the good progress seen in pupils’ work. p.3
- You and your team identified weaknesses in pupils’ understanding in mathematics and, as a result, you have revised the curriculum to meet the needs of the pupils, particularly the girls. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,161
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Miss Debra McGrail St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst School Road Hurst Wokingham Berkshire RG10 0DR
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst
Following my visit to the school on 25 April 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in October 2015.
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Staff morale is high. All staff who responded to the confidential staff questionnaire agreed that the school is well led and managed. The determined leadership that you, your senior leaders and governors provide ensures that the school continues to strengthen. You lead by example and are very proud and committed to the school.
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst
The school is a positive and welcoming place. Pupils are polite, well-mannered and show respect for each other and for adults. Pupils work well together in lessons. I witnessed many examples of collaborative work. For example, in one mathematics lesson, pupils were developing their understanding of positive and negative numbers while solving problems. This enabled them to identify where they had made mistakes and learn from each other.
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst
Pupils are happy to come to school and their attendance is higher than the national averages. They describe their school as ‘amazing’, ‘great’ and ‘caring’. They are clearly proud of their school and enjoy the range of experiences that staff provide.
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst
Staff, parents and carers are extremely enthusiastic about all aspects of the school’s work. One parent said, ‘The school is so nurturing, has a lovely community feel and has a wonderful ethos. The teachers really care about the children and always put in 110%.’
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst
You have built on the strengths of the school and tackled the areas that needed to improve. At the last inspection, the school was asked to improve pupils’ achievement at the end of Reception and in the Year 1 phonics screening check. School records and 2018 outcomes indicate that your work in these areas has had an impact with the proportion of pupils achieving the expected standard being well above the national averages.
p.1
Short inspection of St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst
You and your leaders are good at identifying how to improve pupils’ progress. Pupils make better progress in reading and writing than they do in mathematics. There are some inconsistencies in the quality of the teaching of mathematics in some classes. You have identified this as a priority in your development plans and recognise that mathematics needs to be more challenging, particularly for the girls, to enable them to make greater progress.
p.2
Short inspection of St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst
You and your governors have ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and that records are detailed and of high quality. Your checks on the suitability of staff to work with children are thorough. Training for staff is up to date and in line with the latest statutory guidance. There is a strong culture of promoting pupils’ well-being and safety in the school. One pupil said, ‘It is a great community and everyone helps each other.’
p.2
Short inspection of St Nicholas Church of England Primary, Hurst
You and your team have created a strong sense of community, based on Christian values. Pupils say they feel safe and enjoy their learning. Pupils I spoke with confidently described the range of strategies they used to stay safe. For example, they knew how to stay safe when using the internet. Relationships between staff and pupils are excellent. The vast majority of parents who completed the Ofsted online questionnaire, Parent View, stated that pupils are safe and well looked after at this school. One parent commented, ‘St Nicholas is a lovely, warm and caring school.’
p.2
Inspection findings
At the start of the inspection, we agreed to look at the effectiveness of safeguarding, how effectively you have improved the teaching of writing, the progress of pupils, including girls, in mathematics and the progress of the most able pupils at key stage 1 in writing. In 2018, the proportion of girls that made good progress in mathematics was lower than that of other girls nationally with similar starting points. You and your team identified weaknesses in pupils’ understanding in mathematics and, as a result, you have revised the curriculum to meet the needs of the pupils, particularly the girls. Regular problem-solving activities now form a part of the mathematics work to help pupils apply their understanding to real-life contexts. You and your team have identified that further work is needed to challenge girls in mathematics and to enable them to develop a deep understanding and reach the higher standards.
p.2
Inspection findings
The previous inspection report asked that you stretch pupils further in lessons, including the most able, so that they make better progress. In 2018 at key stage 2, more pupils reached the higher standard in writing than previously. The school’s reorganised curriculum enables teachers to focus on improving the range of writing that pupils have to experience. Pupils told me that they enjoy the writing topics. You introduced a more creative approach to writing using good-quality texts to engage pupils. Work in books and current assessment information show that the topics are having a positive effect on writing outcomes. Writing in pupils’ books confirms that pupils are becoming increasingly skilled at editing and improving their writing. Pupils take pride in their work and present it neatly. The curriculum has been well designed so that pupils acquire skills, knowledge and understanding in a wide range of subjects. Right from the start, pupils are
p.2
Inspection findings
given the chance to explore the world around them. Pupils enjoy a wide range of educational visits and told me how much they enjoy learning in different situations. These experiences help to improve their reading, writing and mathematical skills. The curriculum is enhanced by a wide range of extra- curricular activities on offer including judo, science and football. These contribute to pupils’ well-rounded and enjoyable education. Senior leaders work collaboratively as an effective team. They lead by example and keep a careful check on the quality of teaching and pupils’ work in books. There is some variability in the accuracy of teachers’ assessments and these do not always reflect the good progress seen in pupils’ work. The headteacher accepts that there are some weaknesses in the school’s development plans for improving teaching and learning. For example, they do not include clear measurable milestones or targets to enable leaders and governors to evaluate
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
pupils’ rates of progress in mathematics continue to improve, particularly for the most able girls they refine their development plans to include clear milestones and targets to enable leaders and governors to evaluate the impact of these plans.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Oxford, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Wokingham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
I met with you and several members of staff. We talked about the improvements which have been made since the last inspection. Together, we undertook observations of learning in lessons. I examined pupils’ work, focusing on mathematics and writing. I held a meeting with three governors, including the chair of governors. Before the inspection, I examined a variety of documents, including the school’s website, published performance information and a summary of your school’s self-evaluation document. I took account of 40 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 16 written comments. I also considered 18 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey and the 60 responses to the pupil questionnaire. A range of documentary evidence was evaluated, including documents relating to safeguarding and governance.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion