Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Neville's Cross Primary School and Nursery
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
25 Apr 2019
- Inspectorssingle source
Chris Smith
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
DH1 4JG
- Name on report verified
Neville’s Cross Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,600
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Charlotte Ferguson Acting headteacher Neville’s Cross Primary School Relly Path Durham DH1 4JG
p.1
Short inspection of Neville’s Cross Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 25 April 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the second short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in May 2011.
p.1
Short inspection of Neville’s Cross Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. In September 2018, the substantive headteacher began a secondment with the local authority. Since then, you have stepped up and taken on the school’s leadership with confidence and an absolute determination to uphold high standards. You have formed an effective leadership team with your new deputy headteacher and, together, you are stamping your personalities on the school. You are not complacent. You know the school very well and are acting where you believe improvements can be made. The vast majority of parents and carers continue to be very supportive and pleased with the school. In their written responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, many told me that they believe the school provides a well-balanced education that fosters their children’s academic and personal development effectively. Almost all the parents who responded to
p.1
Short inspection of Neville’s Cross Primary School
The governing body works to a clear set of values, which are evident in the day-to- day running of the school. The school is inclusive. Themed weeks actively promote diversity and the curriculum places a strong emphasis on the development of the whole child. I noted pupils running a daily mile at the start of the day, the forest school activities, a singing assembly and an inclusive approach to sport. All were taking place as typical school activities. In our visits to lessons, we also noted the calm, purposeful and studious approach to learning that typified each classroom. Pupils listened intently and applied themselves fully when working independently. A characteristic of the school was the way in which pupils collaborated effectively and supported one another to learn. It is not surprising therefore that, over time, levels of attendance have been above average, incidents of bullying are rare and
p.1
Short inspection of Neville’s Cross Primary School
You and your teachers strive for academic excellence. Standards in reading, writing and mathematics have remained above those seen nationally since the school’s last inspection. Last year, by the end of key stage 2, the proportion of pupils attaining the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics was 10% above the national average. Furthermore, the proportion of pupils who attained the higher standard at this measure was 12% above the national average. These outcomes demonstrate that you have successfully addressed the areas for improvement that were identified in the school’s last inspection. Standards over time have also been above average at the end of key stage 1. You are aware that the standards attained in the Year 1 phonics screening check and at the end of Reception last year were only in line with national averages and you feel, given the starting points of children, that they should be better. Consequently, these areas are a focus for you
p.2
Short inspection of Neville’s Cross Primary School
this year. The school has relatively few disadvantaged pupils. Those currently in the school are making similar progress to others in the school and attaining similar standards to other pupils nationally.
p.2
Short inspection of Neville’s Cross Primary School
The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. You are highly vigilant and ensure that all members of staff adopt the same approach and attitude. Although you have not needed to make many child protection referrals to other agencies, you ensure that safeguarding has a high profile. Safeguarding is a standing agenda item on senior leadership team meetings and your weekly briefing ensures that the staff are well informed and clear about their responsibilities.
p.2
Short inspection of Neville’s Cross Primary School
In staff training sessions, you regularly check how staff would respond to different safeguarding scenarios. This approach has helped to keep staff aware of issues such as radicalisation, child sexual exploitation and online safety. Your staff are trained to think ‘it could happen here’, and therefore act in a vigilant manner. You have the capacity to support more vulnerable pupils and work closely with families if you identify any concerns.
p.2
Short inspection of Neville’s Cross Primary School
The curriculum supports pupils’ personal development and safety effectively. For example, pupils learn how to stay safe online, about friendships, different types of families and healthy eating. This rounded approach contributes to pupils feeling safe and secure in school and beyond.
p.2
Inspection findings
In this inspection, I wanted to check if pupils currently in the school are continuing to make good progress. I found that you have refined how you assess pupils’ progress since the last inspection and that you and the governors use assessment information intelligently. Together, you use it to identify where progress is strong and where it is less so. Your assessment information shows that progress rates are strong for most pupils, although there is some variability and a few pupils are not making the progress they should. You have identified, for example, that some Year 3 pupils have not made the progress expected so far this year. You have analysed why and, in response, made some changes to the way you group classes in lower key stage 2. These changes have only just been made and therefore it is too early to know if they will be beneficial for pupils. Pupils in the current Year 6 are attaining particularly well. Your assessments
p.2
Inspection findings
indicate that around two thirds of the cohort are on track to attain the higher standard in reading, writing and mathematics this year. My checks on the quality and complexity of the work in their mathematics books support this view. Pupils take great pride in their work. They set out their work methodically and confidently draw on their mathematical knowledge to tackle problems. I found the teaching of mathematics to be consistently good across the school. The careful monitoring of teaching by the subject leader, and her subsequent training for colleagues, has helped to improve the balance of activities within the mathematics curriculum. Your work to improve pupils’ early reading development is also bearing fruit. You recognised that teachers were using different approaches to the teaching and assessment of phonics last year. Together with the deputy headteacher, you have reviewed this and streamlined teaching methods to be more consistent. You
p.3
Inspection findings
now track pupils’ progress in phonics more rigorously and group pupils more carefully, so that teaching is more sharply attuned to their needs. The phonics teaching we observed together was effective in building pupils’ confidence and fluency. By the end of key stage 1, almost all pupils can read at the standard expected for their age. However, this year, some pupils have not made the progress expected in their first year in key stage 2. This has also slowed their progress in writing. I listened to some of these pupils read and found that, although they could decode words effectively, they lacked fluency and did not use punctuation well. This indicates that more reading practice is needed, or weaknesses in their comprehension of texts are likely to increase as they move through the school. During the inspection, we also discussed the design of the curriculum. This was because I noticed that a review of the curriculum is a priority in your school
p.3
Inspection findings
improvement plan. I learned that you want to increase the time for pupils to study the wider curriculum subjects such as history, geography and art. You explained that you want to ensure that pupils develop knowledge and understanding within these subjects as rigorously as they do in English and mathematics. This term, you have begun to trial the use of some commercially produced curriculum materials and you hope to have new curriculum planning fully in place for September. However, I was not convinced that you and the staff have a well-developed rationale for these changes, or clear enough plans for implementing your revised curriculum. It was not clear, for example, how you would improve the sequencing of knowledge taught within subject disciplines while maintaining a topic-based approach. As changes have been made to the leadership of the school this year, I wanted to check whether the governors were providing the necessary scrutiny, support
p.3
Inspection findings
and challenge for a new leadership team. I found governors to have a good balance of experience, vision and energy. Governors feel that their roles have been revitalised by the current chair of the governing body. The governors have realigned how they monitor the work of the school and consequently have become more active. As a result, they know the school well. They have skilfully supported you to address a shortfall in the school budget so that staffing levels can be sustained. Their vision for nursery provision at the school is now being realised, with healthy numbers of children in the nursery this year. Furthermore, their careful scrutiny of in-year tracking data is ensuring strong accountability across the whole school. Governors are strategic in approach and work with clear moral purpose.
p.4
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.4
Next steps for the school
all pupils in lower key stage 2 build on the good start they make in key stage 1 and continue to make good progress, especially in reading and writing they carefully plan and implement changes to the curriculum at a realistic pace, so that pupils acquire a richer knowledge, skills and understanding across the foundation subjects.
p.4
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Durham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
During this one-day inspection, I met with you, the subject leader for mathematics, the chair of the governing body and five other governors. I also met with a representative of the local authority. I talked to a group of pupils and listened to some Year 1 and some Year 3 pupils read. Together, you and I visited lessons in the Nursery class, a Reception class and classes in key stages 1 and 2 to look at the quality of teaching and learning. During lesson visits, I checked some pupils’ books and talked to some pupils about their learning and progress. The mathematics subject leader and I looked in detail at some pupils’ mathematics books. The sample of books selected covered pupils with different starting points and from different key stages. In the afternoon, I visited lessons to observe some teaching in subjects other than English and mathematics and sampled some topic books. I looked at the 130 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online survey, and considered the five
p.4
Information about the inspection
responses to Ofsted’s staff survey. I scrutinised a range of documentation including the school’s self-evaluation and improvement planning, policies and assessment information. I also checked other documents available on the school website. I focused particularly on the progress of pupils currently in the school, especially in mathematics, and the breadth and balance of the curriculum. I also looked at the work of governors and the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion