Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Middlemarch School

Inspected 3 Apr 2019 · published 9 May 2019 · URN 125761

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    3 Apr 2019

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Matt Meckin

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CV10 7BQ

  • Name on report verified

    Middlemarch School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 10% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyexcellentsuccessfuleffectivestrongpositiveeffectivelyvery well
Criticismconcernsnot strongnot consistentlyweaknessesnot good enoughweakerabsencenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1442w+35
  • What needs to improve143w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,567
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs G Mawdsley Headteacher Middlemarch School College Street Nuneaton Warwickshire CV10 7BQ

p.1

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

Following my visit to the school on 3 April 2019, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in June 2015.

p.1

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.

p.1

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

Your effective leadership contributes well to the ongoing improvements seen in the school in the last three years. You have worked well with other leaders to refine teaching and, as a result, pupils’ attainment has risen. There is a strong sense of teamwork among staff and all those who completed Ofsted’s staff survey said that they feel supported by leaders. High staff morale translates into the ethos of the school. Pupils receive good social, emotional and academic support. They enjoy school, behave well and are well prepared for secondary school.

p.1

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

Leaders and staff have worked well to manage changes in pupil intake in recent years. The number of new pupils joining from overseas, or from other schools, has increased significantly. For example, this academic year alone 25 new pupils have joined different year groups in the school. Some of these pupils have complex needs and this has taken time and resources to help them settle successfully.

p.1

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

Pupils’ attainment at the end of key stage 2 was not high enough in 2016. However, you have responded well to this and attainment has risen every year since. Mathematics teaching is effective and at the end of key stage 2 in 2018 the proportion of pupils who attained the expected and higher standards was similar to the national average. The work in pupils’ books demonstrates that pupils make very good progress in upper key stage 2. However, pupils’ progress is not consistently strong in lower key stage 2. You have a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in teaching and pupils’ progress. The school improvement plan has generally been fit for purpose over time. For example, it has supported the actions that have taken place to improve disadvantaged pupils’ attainment and the positive work to improve the culture for reading across the school. You recently made a change to the layout of the improvement plan and it is now not as clear as it should be. It does not set out

p.1

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

clearly enough which leaders are responsible for actions or the precise timescales in which actions need to be take place.

p.2

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

Areas for improvement from the last inspection have been addressed. You reviewed the presentation policy and the approach to teaching handwriting. Most pupils take pride in their work and present it well. There has been an increased and successful focus on supporting pupils who do not have a strong grasp of phonics when they start the school in Year 3. You have also made sure that pupils who speak English as an additional language are given good support on their journey through school.

p.2

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

Pupils enjoy the broad range of enrichment opportunities that are provided. During the inspection, they talked of the different extra-curricular clubs that they attend. Examples include Lego, art, cooking, brownies, basketball and football. Pupils also really enjoy music lessons such as learning to play the drums or clarinet.

p.2

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

The specialist provision on-site for pupils with communication and interaction needs provides excellent support for the four pupils on roll. Nurturing relationships and well-planned work help pupils to progress well and enjoy school.

p.2

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

The governing body provides effective challenge and support to you. Governors take their roles seriously and have a good understanding of where improvements need to be made. For example, they commissioned a review of the pupil premium and have ensured that leaders have taken successful action to raise attainment.

p.2

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

The arrangements for safeguarding are fit for purpose. The training that is put on for staff has an obvious impact on their understanding. Staff have a good knowledge of their safeguarding responsibilities and report concerns to safeguarding leads quickly and effectively. You make sure that concerns are followed up effectively and make referrals to the local authority in a timely way. You are, also, not afraid to challenge external bodies where support for pupils or families is not good enough.

p.2

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

The checks that are carried out for the safe recruitment of staff are very well organised and thorough.

p.2

Short inspection of Middlemarch School

Pupils have an excellent understanding of how to keep themselves safe. During the inspection, pupils had a crystal-clear view of the dangers that can be associated with the internet. They know that they must not give out personal information and to quickly tell a trusted adult if they are concerned about something that they see online. Pupils value the range of visitors that come into school to talk about safety. For example, pupils talked about what they had learned about fire and road safety. You ensure that pupils are growing up with good self-awareness, so that they can be vigilant and ask for help when they sense something is not right.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The teaching of reading has improved since the previous inspection. Pupils enjoy reading and talk excitedly about the novels that they read together in class. The whole-class texts are used to create follow-up, comprehension activities. In some classes, this approach is working extremely well. For example, during the inspection, teachers in Year 6 used good questioning to develop pupils’ understanding of their text, ‘Goodnight Mr Tom’. Pupils enjoyed learning new vocabulary and trying to infer meaning from the author’s writing.  Across the school, there has been a much-improved focus on developing pupils’ comprehension skills. Sometimes, follow-up tasks in pupils’ books demonstrate that the level of challenge is not consistently strong. While reading attainment has risen in recent years, it is still not high enough.  You have raised the profile of reading by using a range of stimulating texts and

p.3

Inspection findings

developed a new library. Home-reading records are used well by most pupils and indicate that pupils read their books on a regular basis. Most pupils’ books match well to their reading ability and they read fluently. However, occasionally, weaker readers are choosing books that are too challenging and need too much support to read words that they are not familiar with.  The journey of curriculum design has been carefully considered in recent years. There is a high proportion of boys in the school, compared to the national average. You designed the curriculum topics so that they would appeal to all, but particularly to boys. This is starting to prove successful. The curriculum is generally broad and balanced. Teachers make sure that pupils receive opportunities to write across different subjects, such as history and science. Pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding develop particularly well in subjects

p.3

Inspection findings

such as art, science, and music. Pupils really enjoy the wider, curriculum subjects and spoke enthusiastically about the dance lessons in physical education.  The provision for pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) is good. The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) was appointed in the autumn term and has started the appropriate SENCo training. She works well with a lead teaching assistant and other staff to plan and monitor successful additional support. There are a significant number of pupils with complex needs and the proportion of pupils who have an education, health and care (EHC) plan is above the national average. There are also several more EHC plans going through the application process. Leaders work well with external agencies to make sure that pupils with complex needs get the support that they need.  The number of pupils who are on the register for SEND support is too high. The

p.3

Inspection findings

criteria for identifying pupils to go on the register is not clear enough. A high number of pupils start school in Year 3 already identified with SEND from their previous school. Historically, leaders have not reviewed this regularly enough and some pupils remain on the register unnecessarily.  Overall, absence is not seriously concerning but it is above the national average. The absence rate for disadvantaged pupils is too high. You do monitor absence levels and intervene to support pupils and families. Much of this work focuses on putting in place family support. In some isolated cases, this has had a positive impact. However, this approach has not had a successful impact for all and leaders have not provided enough challenge in places. For example, where you have identified individual attendance concerns you are yet to make attendance referrals to the local authority.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 the new approaches to the teaching of reading are fully embedded, so that all pupils receive a high level of support and challenge in their reading  pupils’ progress in lower key stage 2 is consistently strong across all classes  the school improvement is further developed, so that it clearly outlines who is responsible for actions and the precise timescales for those actions to take place  attendance rates improve for disadvantaged pupils  the criteria in place for identifying pupils with SEND is clearer and pupils who do not need to be on the register are taken off.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Warwickshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I held meetings with you and several other leaders. I met with three governors and spoke to the local authority school improvement adviser on the telephone. I spoke to pupils informally and formally. I made short visits to nine lessons and looked at a range of pupils’ books. I spoke to parents at the start of the day and considered the free-text responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. I also considered the responses to Ofsted’s online staff questionnaire.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion